IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8113-d1148467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Organizational Guidelines for Enhancing Psychological Well-Being, Safety, and Performance in Technology Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Fraboni

    (Department of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Hannah Brendel

    (Department of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Luca Pietrantoni

    (Department of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Organizations that integrate new technologies, such as collaborative robots, often struggle to maintain workers’ psychological well-being during transitions. Integrating new technologies can, in fact, negatively impact job satisfaction, motivation, and organizational culture. It is thus essential to prioritize workers’ psychological sustainability to benefit fully from these technologies’ advantages, such as reduced production times and increased flexibility. This study evaluates the impact of eight guidelines designed to support organizations in optimizing human–robot collaboration. The guidelines focus on safety, training, communication, worker agency, and stakeholder involvement. We investigated possible implementation solutions and assessment methods or KPIs for each guideline. We conducted an online survey targeting experts in robotics to gather opinions on the guidelines’ potential impact on workers’ psychological well-being, safety, and performance. The survey also asked about implementation solutions and KPIs for evaluating their effectiveness. Proposed solutions, such as demonstration videos and hands-on training, have the potential to enhance users’ perceived safety and confidence in the system. KPIs, such as subjective perceived safety, risk assessment, and user satisfaction, can be employed to assess the success of these implementations. The study highlights key strategies for ensuring workers’ psychological well-being, optimizing performance, and promoting a smooth integration of robotic technologies. By addressing these factors, organizations can better navigate technology integration challenges, fostering a more sustainable and human-centric approach to deploying robotic systems in the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Fraboni & Hannah Brendel & Luca Pietrantoni, 2023. "Evaluating Organizational Guidelines for Enhancing Psychological Well-Being, Safety, and Performance in Technology Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8113-:d:1148467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Culot, Giovanna & Nassimbeni, Guido & Orzes, Guido & Sartor, Marco, 2020. "Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Renae A. Jones & Nerina L. Jimmieson & Andrew Griffiths, 2005. "The Impact of Organizational Culture and Reshaping Capabilities on Change Implementation Success: The Mediating Role of Readiness for Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 361-386, March.
    3. Wim Lambrechts & Jessica S. Klaver & Lennart Koudijzer & Janjaap Semeijn, 2021. "Human Factors Influencing the Implementation of Cobots in High Volume Distribution Centres," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Ana Colim & Rita Morgado & Paula Carneiro & Nélson Costa & Carlos Faria & Nuno Sousa & Luís A. Rocha & Pedro Arezes, 2021. "Lean Manufacturing and Ergonomics Integration: Defining Productivity and Wellbeing Indicators in a Human–Robot Workstation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Catherine Maware & David M. Parsley, 2022. "The Challenges of Lean Transformation and Implementation in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Auktor, Georgeta Vidican, 2022. "The opportunities and challenges of Industry 4.0 for industrial development: A case study of Morocco's automotive and garment sectors," IDOS Discussion Papers 2/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Dorine Maurice Mattar, 2021. "An Organizational Change With Quarantined Members," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    5. Amelia Manuti & Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Monica Molino & Emanuela Ingusci & Vincenzo Russo & Fulvio Signore & Margherita Zito & Claudio Giovanni Cortese, 2020. "“Everything Will Be Fine”: A Study on the Relationship between Employees’ Perception of Sustainable HRM Practices and Positive Organizational Behavior during COVID19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Brho, Mazen & Jazairy, Amer & Glassburner, Aaron V., 2025. "The finance of cybersecurity: Quantitative modeling of investment decisions and net present value," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Özköse, Hakan & Güney, Gül, 2023. "The effects of industry 4.0 on productivity: A scientific mapping study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Bouckenooghe, Dave & Schwarz, Gavin M. & Kanar, Adam & Sanders, Karin, 2021. "Revisiting research on attitudes toward organizational change: Bibliometric analysis and content facet analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 137-148.
    9. Gort, Marjan & Broekhuis, Manda & Regts, Gerdien, 2013. "How teams use indicators for quality improvement – A multiple-case study on the use of multiple indicators in multidisciplinary breast cancer teams," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 69-77.
    10. Zheng, Deyuan & Song, Hang & Zhao, Chunguang & Liu, Yujiao & Zhao, Wenhao, 2024. "Is it possible for semiconductor companies to reduce carbon emissions through digital transformation? Evidence from China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    11. Yan Ling & María Concepción López-Fernández & Ana María Serrano-Bedia & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2020. "Organizational culture and entrepreneurial orientation: examination through a new conceptualization lens," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 709-737, June.
    12. Moazzeni, Sahar & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2025. "Collaborative logistics and digital technologies in rural contexts: a systematic review and a decision aid model for logistics decision-makers," Discussion Papers 2025/12, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    13. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:469-479 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Fleury, Marie-Josée & Grenier, Guy & Vallée, Catherine & Hurtubise, Roch & Lévesque, Paul-André, 2014. "The role of advocacy coalitions in a project implementation process: The example of the planning phase of the At Home/Chez Soi project dealing with homelessness in Montreal," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 42-49.
    15. Henrik Saabye & Thomas Borup Kristensen & Brian Vejrum Wæhrens, 2020. "Real-Time Data Utilization Barriers to Improving Production Performance: An In-depth Case Study Linking Lean Management and Industry 4.0 from a Learning Organization Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Benjamin Van Rooij & Adam Fine, 2018. "Toxic Corporate Culture: Assessing Organizational Processes of Deviancy," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-38, June.
    17. Yunus Zengin & Serkan Naktiyok & Erdoğan Kaygın & Onur Kavak & Ethem Topçuoğlu, 2021. "An Investigation upon Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 within the Context of Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Paolo Morganti & Rosa Carolina Valdes, 2023. "The Perils of Asymmetrical Technological Changes in a Knowledge Economy with Complete Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Raffaella Tabacco & Maria Chiarvesio & Rubina Romanello, 2024. "Exploring the crossroads between digital servitization and sustainability from a business marketing perspective," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2024(2), pages 225-243, June.
    20. Haffar, Mohamed & Al-Karaghouli, Wafi & Irani, Zahir & Djebarni, Ramdane & Gbadamosi, Gbolahan, 2019. "The influence of individual readiness for change dimensions on quality management implementation in Algerian manufacturing organisations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 247-260.
    21. Muhammad Umar Farooq & Amjad Hussain & Tariq Masood & Muhammad Salman Habib, 2021. "Supply Chain Operations Management in Pandemics: A State-of-the-Art Review Inspired by COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-33, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8113-:d:1148467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.