IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5521-d808599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biofillers Improved Compression Modulus of Extruded PLA Foams

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Mort

    (Materials Science and Engineering Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
    Polymer and Food Protection Consortium, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Erin Peters

    (Materials Science and Engineering Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Greg Curtzwiler

    (Polymer and Food Protection Consortium, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
    Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Shan Jiang

    (Materials Science and Engineering Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
    Polymer and Food Protection Consortium, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

  • Keith Vorst

    (Polymer and Food Protection Consortium, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
    Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

Abstract

Foams produced with biobased materials, such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA), cellulose, starch, and plant oil-based polyurethanes, have become more and more important in the circular economy. However, there are still significant challenges, including inferior performance and higher cost. The use of low-cost filler material has the potential to reduce the cost and alter the composite properties of biobased foams. By selecting biofillers derived from plant material, we can reduce the cost without sacrificing the compostability. This study explored the impact of landfill-diverted biofiller material, ground coffee chaff and rice hulls on the physical properties of biobased foams. Both biofillers were extrusion compounded with PLA, then extruded into rigid foams using a physical blowing agent. A filler concentration up to 10 weight % rice hull or 5 weight % coffee chaff could be incorporated without a significant increase in density, in comparison to the regular PLA foam. The thermal conductivity was similarly unaffected by biofiller loading, with values ranging between 71.5 and 76.2 mW/m-K. Surprisingly, the filler composite foams possessed impressive mechanical properties with all compressive moduli above 300 MPa. Only 5 weight % loading resulted in the doubling of compressive modulus, compared to the regular PLA foam. These results indicate that landfill-diverted fillers can strengthen foam mechanical properties without impacting thermal insulation performance, by forming reinforcing networks within the cell walls.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Mort & Erin Peters & Greg Curtzwiler & Shan Jiang & Keith Vorst, 2022. "Biofillers Improved Compression Modulus of Extruded PLA Foams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5521-:d:808599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5521/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5521/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cleveland, Cutler J., 2005. "Net energy from the extraction of oil and gas in the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 769-782.
    2. Daniel Maga & Markus Hiebel & Venkat Aryan, 2019. "A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Meat Trays Made of Various Packaging Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam R. Brandt, 2011. "Oil Depletion and the Energy Efficiency of Oil Production: The Case of California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Deniz Turkcu & Nina Tura & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of the Sustainability Challenges Experienced during the Life Cycle of Biobased Packaging Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Liao, Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2010. "China's energy consumption: A perspective from Divisia aggregation approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 28-34.
    4. Florian Fizaine & Victor Court, 2016. "The energy-economic growth relationship: a new insight from the EROI perspective," Working Papers 1601, Chaire Economie du climat.
    5. Roma, Antonio & Pirino, Davide, 2009. "The extraction of natural resources: The role of thermodynamic efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2594-2606, August.
    6. Zhaoyang Kong & Xiucheng Dong & Bo Xu & Rui Li & Qiang Yin & Cuifang Song, 2015. "EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Michael Dale & Susan Krumdieck & Pat Bodger, 2011. "A Dynamic Function for Energy Return on Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Markéta Šerešová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Proposal of Package-to-Product Indicator for Carbon Footprint Assessment with Focus on the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Dupont, Elise & Koppelaar, Rembrandt & Jeanmart, Hervé, 2018. "Global available wind energy with physical and energy return on investment constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 322-338.
    10. Lina I. Brand-Correa & Paul E. Brockway & Claire L. Copeland & Timothy J. Foxon & Anne Owen & Peter G. Taylor, 2017. "Developing an Input-Output Based Method to Estimate a National-Level Energy Return on Investment (EROI)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Arodudu, Oludunsin Tunrayo & Helming, Katharina & Voinov, Alexey & Wiggering, Hubert, 2017. "Integrating agronomic factors into energy efficiency assessment of agro-bioenergy production – A case study of ethanol and biogas production from maize feedstock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 426-439.
    12. Jiabin Chen & Shaobo Wen, 2020. "Implications of Energy Intensity Ratio for Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of PLA Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Russi, Daniela, 2008. "An integrated assessment of a large-scale biodiesel production in Italy: Killing several birds with one stone?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1169-1180, March.
    15. Dale, M. & Krumdieck, S. & Bodger, P., 2012. "Global energy modelling — A biophysical approach (GEMBA) Part 2: Methodology," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 158-167.
    16. Alexandre Poisson & Charles A. S. Hall, 2013. "Time Series EROI for Canadian Oil and Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-20, November.
    17. Court, Victor & Fizaine, Florian, 2017. "Long-Term Estimates of the Energy-Return-on-Investment (EROI) of Coal, Oil, and Gas Global Productions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 145-159.
    18. Chen, Xuejun & Lu, Hailong & Gu, Lijuan & Shang, Shilong & Zhang, Yi & Huang, Xin & Zhang, Le, 2022. "Preliminary evaluation of the economic potential of the technologies for gas hydrate exploitation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    19. Trivedi, Parthsarathi & Olcay, Hakan & Staples, Mark D. & Withers, Mitch R. & Malina, Robert & Barrett, Steven R.H., 2015. "Energy return on investment for alternative jet fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 167-174.
    20. Kubiszewski, Ida & Cleveland, Cutler J. & Endres, Peter K., 2010. "Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 218-225.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5521-:d:808599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.