IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4852-d796439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Child-Friendly Environments—What, How and by Whom?

Author

Listed:
  • Märit Jansson

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, Swedish University of Agricutural Sciences (SLU), 234 22 Lomma, Sweden)

  • Emma Herbert

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, Swedish University of Agricutural Sciences (SLU), 234 22 Lomma, Sweden)

  • Alva Zalar

    (Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden)

  • Maria Johansson

    (Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden)

Abstract

The socio-physical qualities of built environments are, in several ways, of imperative importance for children growing up. The Child-Friendly Cities initiative by UNICEF, an implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, has made local governments strive toward child-friendliness. The participation of children and young people is often the focus of such projects, with a potential for a far broader scope. Besides participation processes, what important socio-physical qualities make environments child-friendly, and how can they be developed? This paper presents a structured literature review of the concept of child-friendly environments, in order to address the full socio-physical spectrum. The results focus on concrete factors that have been filtered through child-friendliness and the associated frameworks, showing an inherent dependence between the social context and the physical environment. The shaping of child-friendliness hinges on the realization of environments that are safe, fair, and with accessible and variable green and open spaces. A multi-stakeholder endeavor including, e.g., planners, designers, and managers requires clearly outlined priorities. This study lays the groundwork for further exploration of how the concept of child-friendly environments can lead to positive changes, also as part of the overall strive toward sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Märit Jansson & Emma Herbert & Alva Zalar & Maria Johansson, 2022. "Child-Friendly Environments—What, How and by Whom?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4852-:d:796439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4852/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4852/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiona J. Andrews & Elyse Warner, 2020. "‘Living outside the house’: how families raising young children in new, private high-rise developments experience their local environment," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 263-285, July.
    2. Sabirah Adams & Shazly Savahl & Maria Florence & Kyle Jackson, 2019. "Considering the Natural Environment in the Creation of Child-Friendly Cities: Implications for Children’s Subjective Well-Being," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(2), pages 545-567, April.
    3. Witten, Karen & Kearns, Robin & Carroll, Penelope, 2015. "Urban inclusion as wellbeing: Exploring children's accounts of confronting diversity on inner city streets," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 349-357.
    4. Ann Forsyth, 2020. "What is a healthy place? Models for cities and neighbourhoods," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 186-202, March.
    5. Victoria Derr & Ildikó G. Kovács, 2017. "How participatory processes impact children and contribute to planning: a case study of neighborhood design from Boulder, Colorado, USA," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 29-48, January.
    6. Marguerite Berg, 2013. "City Children and Genderfied Neighbourhoods: The New Generation as Urban Regeneration Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 523-536, March.
    7. Elizelle Juaneé Cilliers & Selna Cornelius, 2019. "The Creation of Rural Child-Friendly Spaces: A Spatial Planning Perspective," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 14(4), pages 925-939, September.
    8. Sharmin, Samia & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2017. "Association between the built environment and children's independent mobility: A meta-analytic review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 104-117.
    9. Debra Flanders Cushing, 2016. "Youth Master Plans as Potential Roadmaps to Creating Child- and Youth-friendly Cities," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 154-173, March.
    10. Nan, Fang, 2020. "Policy innovation on building child friendly cities in China: Evidence from four Chinese cities," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    11. Penelope Carroll & Karen Witten & Robin Kearns & Phil Donovan, 2015. "Kids in the City: Children's Use and Experiences of Urban Neighbourhoods in Auckland, New Zealand," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 417-436, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melody Smith & Rebecca Amann & Alana Cavadino & Deborah Raphael & Robin Kearns & Roger Mackett & Lisa Mackay & Penelope Carroll & Euan Forsyth & Suzanne Mavoa & Jinfeng Zhao & Erika Ikeda & Karen Witt, 2019. "Children’s Transport Built Environments: A Mixed Methods Study of Associations between Perceived and Objective Measures and Relationships with Parent Licence for Independent Mobility in Auckland, New ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Shortt, Niamh K. & Ross, Chris, 2021. "Children's perceptions of environment and health in two Scottish neighbourhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Jinyun Lyu & Huiying Yang & Stella Christie, 2023. "Mommy, Can I Play Outside? How Urban Design Influences Parental Attitudes on Play," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Olsen, Jonathan R. & Thornton, Lukar & Tregonning, Grant & Mitchell, Richard, 2022. "Nationwide equity assessment of the 20-min neighbourhood in the scottish context: A socio-spatial proximity analysis of residential locations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    5. Marguerite van den Berg, 2018. "The discursive uses of Jane Jacobs for the genderfying city: Understanding the productions of space for post-Fordist gender notions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 751-766, March.
    6. Isabel Marzi & Anne Kerstin Reimers, 2018. "Children’s Independent Mobility: Current Knowledge, Future Directions, and Public Health Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Yang Yang & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian & Zhen Shi & Xinyu Wang & Albert Fekete, 2022. "Equity Study on Urban Park Accessibility Based on Improved 2SFCA Method in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Rosanna Salvia & Gianluca Egidi & Luca Salvati & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Giovanni Quaranta, 2020. "In-Between ‘Smart’ Urban Growth and ‘Sluggish’ Rural Development? Reframing Population Dynamics in Greece, 1940–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Karen Villanueva & Amanda Alderton & Carl Higgs & Hannah Badland & Sharon Goldfeld, 2022. "Data to Decisions: Methods to Create Neighbourhood Built Environment Indicators Relevant for Early Childhood Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Sharmin, Samia & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Haque, Md Mazharul, 2020. "The impact of topological properties of built environment on children independent mobility: A comparative study between discretionary vs. nondiscretionary trips in Dhaka," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Sandra Huning & Nina Schuster, 2015. "‘Social Mixing' or ‘Gentrification'? Contradictory Perspectives on Urban Change in the Berlin District of Neukölln," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 738-755, July.
    12. Hazel Easthope & Laura Crommelin & Sophie-May Kerr & Laurence Troy & Ryan van den Nouwelant & Gethin Davison, 2022. "Planning for Lower-Income Households in Privately Developed High-Density Neighbourhoods in Sydney, Australia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 213-228.
    13. Mohit Kumar Agarwal & Vandana Sehgal & Aurobindo Ogra, 2021. "Creating a Child-Friendly Environment: An Interpretation of Children’s Drawings from Planned Neighborhood Parks of Lucknow City," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Ania Ankowska, 2023. "A set of 99 healthy city indicators for application in urban planning and design," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1978-1989, June.
    15. Scheiner, Joachim & Huber, Oliver & Lohmüller, Stefan, 2019. "Children's independent travel to and from primary school: Evidence from a suburban town in Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 116-131.
    16. Camilla Aparecida Silva Oliveira & Ramon Targino Firmino & Fernanda Ferreira & Andréa Maria Duarte Vargas & Efigênia Ferreira e Ferreira, 2022. "Development and Validation of the Quality of Life in the Neighborhood Questionnaire for Children 8 to 10 Years of Age (QoL-N-Kids 8–10)," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(5), pages 1847-1870, October.
    17. Hettinga, Sanne & Boter, Jaap & Dias, Eduardo & Fruijtier, Steven & de Vogel, Brian & Scholten, Henk, 2021. "Urban energy transition in a gaming context: The role of children," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Melissa VanSickle & Christopher Coutts, 2022. "Considerations for Children’s Nature Connection and Park Environmental Justice in Western Societies," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Müller, Sven & Mejia-Dorantes, Lucia & Kersten, Elisa, 2020. "Analysis of active school transportation in hilly urban environments: A case study of Dresden," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Yang Zhou & Meng Wang & Siming Lin & Caiyun Qian, 2022. "Relationship between Children’s Independent Activities and the Built Environment of Outdoor Activity Space in Residential Neighborhoods: A Case Study of Nanjing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4852-:d:796439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.