IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4375-d788347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Road Asset Value Calculation Based on Asset Performance, Community Benefits and Technical Condition

Author

Listed:
  • Ján Mikolaj

    (Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Ľuboš Remek

    (Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Matúš Kozel

    (Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitna 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

The article presents a comprehensive asset management method. Here presented method aims to bridge the economic approach to asset management with the technical approach to road infrastructure life cycle, namely its resilience and performance. The presented asset value calculation methods are based both on socio-economic viewpoints on community benefits of an asset, as well as the technical aspect of the technical condition and residual life calculations of a road infrastructure. In contrast to common road asset management methods, asset value is not arbitrarily annually depreciated, instead, it is exactly calculated based on pavement performance models, pavement construction fatigue and paving material properties. Road asset value calculation is based on the asset performance and the technical condition of a pavement structure and other objects. Road asset performance is defined in terms of society and road user demands put on road category and its qualitative standard. Road asset technical condition is evaluated by the procurement cost calculation and condition deterioration. Value of condition deterioration is defined by residual life expectancy based on fatigue and construction reliability of the road infrastructure. The cross-asset allocation method is used for the creation of programs for claim and allocation of funding. The aim was to increase the credibility of the road administrators with the public as they present their decisions based on road asset management, and to increase the level of acceptance for practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Ján Mikolaj & Ľuboš Remek & Matúš Kozel, 2022. "Road Asset Value Calculation Based on Asset Performance, Community Benefits and Technical Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4375-:d:788347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4375/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4375/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bramka Arga Jafino & Jan Kwakkel & Alexander Verbraeck, 2020. "Transport network criticality metrics: a comparative analysis and a guideline for selection," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 241-264, March.
    2. Floridea Di Ciommo & Yoram Shiftan, 2017. "Transport equity analysis," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 139-151, March.
    3. A Brint & M Black, 2014. "Improving estimates of asset condition using historical data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 65(2), pages 242-251, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jafino, Bramka Arga, 2021. "An equity-based transport network criticality analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 204-221.
    2. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Zha, Wenbin & Li, Jian, 2025. "Understanding commuters' perceived accessibility and travel intentions under rainstorm warnings in Shanghai, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 276-294.
    4. Barati, Hojjat & Yazici, Anil & Almotahari, Amirmasoud, 2024. "A methodology for ranking of critical links in transportation networks based on criticality score distributions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Lee, Hasik & Park, Ho-Chul & Kho, Seung-Young & Kim, Dong-Kyu, 2019. "Assessing transit competitiveness in Seoul considering actual transit travel times based on smart card data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Chris Tennant & Susan Howard & Sally Stares, 2021. "Building the UK vision of a driverless future: A Parliamentary Inquiry case study," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Accominotti, Olivier & Lucena-Piquero, Delio & Ugolini, Stefano, 2023. "Intermediaries’ substitutability and financial network resilience: A hyperstructure approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Toger, Marina & Türk, Umut & Östh, John & Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter, 2023. "Inequality in leisure mobility: An analysis of activity space segregation spectra in the Stockholm conurbation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Filippos Alogdianakis & Loukas Dimitriou, 2024. "Incorporating equity in multi-objective optimal spatial budget allocation of transit services by tessellating the urban continuum," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 699-741, October.
    10. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    11. Haritha, P.C. & Anjaneyulu, M.V.L.R., 2024. "Comparison of topological functionality-based resilience metrics using link criticality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    12. Shah, Raj & McMann, Oliver & Borthwick, Fiona, 2017. "Challenges and prospects of applying asset management principles to highway maintenance: A case study of the UK," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 231-243.
    13. Borker, Girija, 2024. "Understanding the constraints to women’s use of urban public transport in developing countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Ben-Dor, Golan & Ogulenko, Aleksey & Klein, Ido & Ben-Elia, Eran & Benenson, Itzhak, 2024. "Simulation-based policy evaluation of monetary car driving disincentives in Jerusalem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. Jomehpour Chahar Aman, Javad & Smith-Colin, Janille, 2020. "Transit Deserts: Equity analysis of public transit accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Gandelman, Néstor & Serebrisky, Tomás & Suárez-Alemán, Ancor, 2019. "Household spending on transport in Latin America and the Caribbean: A dimension of transport affordability in the region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Falchetta, G. & Noussan, M. & Hammad, A.T., 2021. "Comparing paratransit in seven major African cities: An accessibility and network analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Sunio, Varsolo & Fillone, Alexis & Abad, Raymund Paolo & Rivera, Joyce & Guillen, Marie Danielle, 2023. "Why does demand-based transport planning persist? Insights from social practice theory," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    19. Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2020. "Planning transport for social inclusion: An accessibility-activity participation approach," SocArXiv ap7wh, Center for Open Science.
    20. Pereira, Rafael H.M., 2019. "Future accessibility impacts of transport policy scenarios: Equity and sensitivity to travel time thresholds for Bus Rapid Transit expansion in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 321-332.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4375-:d:788347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.