IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4216-d785494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Historic and a Modern School Building, Located in the City of Naoussa, Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Vasiliki Pachta

    (Laboratory of Building Materials, School of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Vasiliki Giourou

    (Laboratory of Building Materials, School of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment is often applied as a methodological approach for evaluating the environmental performance and impact of the building sector, including building stock. In the present study, two school buildings, located in the city of Naoussa, N. Greece were analyzed, including a historic and a modern one. The survey concerned on-site inspection and documentation of the structures, data collection and analysis, Life Cycle Impact assessment, as well as comparative evaluation of the results. The objective was to indicate the constructional and performance characteristics of the buildings, as well as to comparatively evaluate their environmental performance and impact. Since historic school buildings still function as educational units, these aspects are crucial and may determine their future operation and use. For LCA, the expected life span of the buildings was taken into account (60 years for the modern school and 140 years for the historic one), as well as all life cycle stages (product, construction, use, end of life, beyond building life). Various indicators were assessed, such as Global Warming Potential (GWP), Fossil Fuel Consumption, Total Primary Energy, Non-Renewable Primary Energy. From the correlation of the results, it was asserted that although the two buildings present similar operational characteristics and needs, they have different environmental performances and impacts, mainly attributed to their different service life and structural characteristics. Although the operational GWP value of the historic building is higher (due to the extended life span), the embodied one is significantly lower (due to the natural materials used for its construction). Other indicators, such as fossil fuel consumption are also higher in the case of the modern school building, indicating that its environmental footprint is more intense.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasiliki Pachta & Vasiliki Giourou, 2022. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of a Historic and a Modern School Building, Located in the City of Naoussa, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4216-:d:785494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stella Tsoka & Theodoros Theodosiou & Konstantia Papadopoulou & Katerina Tsikaloudaki, 2020. "Assessing the Energy Performance of Prefabricated Buildings Considering Different Wall Configurations and the Use of PCMs in Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Pau Fonseca i Casas & Antoni Fonseca i Casas, 2017. "Using Specification and Description Language for Life Cycle Assesment in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Ana Rosa Gamarra & Carmen Lago & Israel Herrera-Orozco & Yolanda Lechón & Susana Marta Almeida & Joana Lage & Filipe Silva, 2021. "Low-Carbon Economy in Schools: Environmental Footprint and Associated Externalities of Five Schools in Southwestern Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Ardente, Fulvio & Beccali, Marco & Cellura, Maurizio & Mistretta, Marina, 2011. "Energy and environmental benefits in public buildings as a result of retrofit actions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 460-470, January.
    5. Kalliopi G. Droutsa & Simon Kontoyiannidis & Constantinos A. Balaras & Athanassios A. Argiriou & Elena G. Dascalaki & Konstantinos V. Varotsos & Christos Giannakopoulos, 2021. "Climate Change Scenarios and Their Implications on the Energy Performance of Hellenic Non-Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Economou, Agisilaos, 2012. "The use of natural gas and geothermal energy in school units. Greece: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1317-1322.
    2. Leccese, Francesco & Salvadori, Giacomo & Rocca, Michele, 2017. "Critical analysis of the energy performance indicators for road lighting systems in historical towns of central Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 616-628.
    3. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Rodríguez-Soria, Beatriz & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2018. "Integrated life cycle assessment and thermodynamic simulation of a public building’s envelope renovation: Conventional vs. Passivhaus proposal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1510-1521.
    4. Lai, Yuan & Papadopoulos, Sokratis & Fuerst, Franz & Pivo, Gary & Sagi, Jacob & Kontokosta, Constantine E., 2022. "Building retrofit hurdle rates and risk aversion in energy efficiency investments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    5. Qianqian Zhao & Junzhen Li & Roman Fediuk & Sergey Klyuev & Darya Nemova, 2021. "Benefit Evaluation Model of Prefabricated Buildings in Seasonally Frozen Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Mata, Érika & Kalagasidis, Angela Sasic & Johnsson, Filip, 2018. "Contributions of building retrofitting in five member states to EU targets for energy savings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 759-774.
    7. Seyedmohammadreza Heibati & Wahid Maref & Hamed H. Saber, 2019. "Assessing the Energy and Indoor Air Quality Performance for a Three-Story Building Using an Integrated Model, Part One: The Need for Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Shadram, Farshid & Bhattacharjee, Shimantika & Lidelöw, Sofia & Mukkavaara, Jani & Olofsson, Thomas, 2020. "Exploring the trade-off in life cycle energy of building retrofit through optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Shi, Qian & Lai, Xiaodong & Xie, Xin & Zuo, Jian, 2014. "Assessment of green building policies – A fuzzy impact matrix approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 203-211.
    10. Fahlstedt, Oskar & Temeljotov-Salaj, Alenka & Lohne, Jardar & Bohne, Rolf André, 2022. "Holistic assessment of carbon abatement strategies in building refurbishment literature — A scoping review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Truong Dang Hoang Nhat Nguyen & Hyosoo Moon & Yonghan Ahn, 2022. "Critical Review of Trends in Modular Integrated Construction Research with a Focus on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    12. Cellura, Maurizio & Guarino, Francesco & Longo, Sonia & Mistretta, Marina & Orioli, Aldo, 2013. "The role of the building sector for reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gases: An Italian case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 586-597.
    13. Joana Lage & Ana d’Espiney & Nuno Canha & Vítor Manteigas & José Luís Alexandre & Karla Gonçalves & Ricardo Chacartegui & Jesus Lizana & Yolanda Lechón & Ana Rosa Gamarra & Amaia Fernandez & Patrice B, 2022. "Mobility Patterns of Scholar Communities in Southwestern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Syrrokostas, George & Leftheriotis, George & Yannopoulos, Spyros N., 2022. "Lessons learned from 25 years of development of photoelectrochromic devices: A technical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    15. Ballarini, Ilaria & Corgnati, Stefano Paolo & Corrado, Vincenzo, 2014. "Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: The experience of TABULA project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 273-284.
    16. Jagarajan, Rehmaashini & Abdullah Mohd Asmoni, Mat Naim & Mohammed, Abdul Hakim & Jaafar, Mohd Nadzri & Lee Yim Mei, Janice & Baba, Maizan, 2017. "Green retrofitting – A review of current status, implementations and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1360-1368.
    17. Frank Meissner & Armin Haas & Jochen Hinkel & Alexander Bisaro, 2020. "A typology for analysing mitigation and adaptation win-win strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 539-564, June.
    18. Li, Jun & Ng, S. Thomas & Skitmore, Martin, 2017. "Review of low-carbon refurbishment solutions for residential buildings with particular reference to multi-story buildings in Hong Kong," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 393-407.
    19. Jesus Fernando Hinojosa & Saul Fernando Moreno & Victor Manuel Maytorena, 2023. "Low-Temperature Applications of Phase Change Materials for Energy Storage: A Descriptive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-39, March.
    20. Zhang, Chunbo & Hu, Mingming & Laclau, Benjamin & Garnesson, Thomas & Yang, Xining & Tukker, Arnold, 2021. "Energy-carbon-investment payback analysis of prefabricated envelope-cladding system for building energy renovation: Cases in Spain, the Netherlands, and Sweden," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4216-:d:785494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.