IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2218-d750164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Enhance Smart Work Effectiveness as a Sustainable HRM Practice in the Tourism Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Hyunjung (Helen) Choi

    (Hotel Management Major, Tourism Management Division, Baekseok University, Chungcheongnam-do, Cheonan-si 31065, Korea)

  • Jin Young Lee

    (Hotel & Tourism Management Department, Woo Song University, Daejeon 34606, Korea)

  • Youngjoon Choi

    (Department of International Office Administration, College of Science & Industry Convergence, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea)

  • Yuxian Juan

    (School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 519000, China)

  • Choong-Ki Lee

    (College of Hotel & Tourism Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

Abstract

With the development of information technologies and increasing interest in sustainability, many companies have adopted smart work as a sustainable human resource practice. Moreover, the outbreak of COVID-19 has further promoted smart work in the workplace. However, the benefits and disadvantages of smart work are still under debate. In this regard, this study attempted to delve into how to enhance smart work implementation by exploring employees’ subjectivity. Hana Tour, which is considered a good model of smart work in South Korea, was selected as a sample company. Q-methodology was employed to listen to employees’ subjective opinions about smart work that they experienced. This study identified five types of smart work perceptions, namely, “self-development and energy saving,” “quality of personal life,” “job satisfaction,” “work engagement,” and “work–life balance”. Based on these five types, the theoretical and practical implications are discussed in the last chapter. Interestingly, the results showed that employees were not well aware of smart work effectiveness as one of the environmental protection practices in sustainability management paradigms. Another notable result was that employees were not concerned about the potential penalties of their engagement in smart work. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, the study’s findings are beneficial to the improvement of smart work implementation as a sustainable HRM practice in business.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyunjung (Helen) Choi & Jin Young Lee & Youngjoon Choi & Yuxian Juan & Choong-Ki Lee, 2022. "How to Enhance Smart Work Effectiveness as a Sustainable HRM Practice in the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2218-:d:750164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2218/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2218/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Hynes, 2014. "Telework Isn’t Working: A Policy Review," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 45(4), pages 579-602.
    2. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Viktor Prokop & Dragan Ilic & Elena Gurgu & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Cezar Braicu & Alina Moanță, 2021. "The Relationship between Eco-Innovation and Smart Working as Support for Sustainable Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Ko, Eun-Jung & Kim, A-Hyun & Kim, Sang-Soo, 2021. "Toward the understanding of the appropriation of ICT-based Smart-work and its impact on performance in organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    4. François Grima & Pascal Paille & Marie Ève Dufour, 2015. "Contribution to social exchange in public organizations: examining how support, trust, satisfaction, commitment and work outcomes are related," Post-Print hal-01174093, HAL.
    5. Kristina Palm & Ann Bergman & Calle Rosengren, 2020. "Towards More Proactive Sustainable Human Resource Management Practices? A Study on Stress Due to the ICT-Mediated Integration of Work and Private Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hokyeom Kim & Injun Choi & Jitaek Lim & Sanghyun Sung, 2022. "Business Process-Organizational Structure (BP-OS) Performance Measurement Model and Problem-Solving Guidelines for Efficient Organizational Management in an Ontact Work Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Raniah Alsahafi & Ahmed Alzahrani & Rashid Mehmood, 2023. "Smarter Sustainable Tourism: Data-Driven Multi-Perspective Parameter Discovery for Autonomous Design and Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-64, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia L. O. Beckel & Gwenith G. Fisher, 2022. "Telework and Worker Health and Well-Being: A Review and Recommendations for Research and Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-32, March.
    2. O'Keefe, Paul & Caulfield, Brian & Brazil, William & White, Peter, 2016. "The impacts of telecommuting in Dublin," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 13-20.
    3. Bilan, Yuriy & Oliinyk, Olena & Mishchuk, Halyna & Skare, Marinko, 2023. "Impact of information and communications technology on the development and use of knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Queen Emwenkeke Usadolo & Yvonne Brunetto & Silvia Nelson & Patrick Gillett, 2022. "Connecting the Dots: Perceived Organization Support, Motive Fulfilment, Job Satisfaction, and Affective Commitment Among Volunteers," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    5. Bassant Adel Mostafa, 2021. "The Effect of Remote Working on Employees Wellbeing and Work-Life Integration during Pandemic in Egypt," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(3), pages 1-41, March.
    6. Magnus Olsén Hammarfjord & Tommy Roxenhall, 2017. "The Relationships Between Network Commitment, Antecedents, And Innovation In Strategic Innovation Networks," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-36, May.
    7. Battisti, Enrico & Alfiero, Simona & Leonidou, Erasmia, 2022. "Remote working and digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Economic–financial impacts and psychological drivers for employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 38-50.
    8. Muhammad Azam Roomi & José Manuel Saiz-Alvarez & Alicia Coduras, 2021. "Measuring Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Eco-Innovation: A Methodological Proposal for the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Shu-Chuan Chen & Da-Sheng Lee & Chien-Yi Huang, 2021. "Evaluating the Sustainable Operating Performance of Electronics Industry Groups: Taiwanese Firms in Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Jacob P. Manahan, 2022. "Implementation of PRIME-HRM Program Using Cloud-Based Technology," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 4(1), pages 102-119.
    11. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Aleksandar Šević & Milena P. Ilić & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Nevenka Popović Šević & Larisa Mihoreanu, 2021. "Untapped Aspects of Innovation and Competition within a European Resilient Circular Economy. A Dual Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    12. Fanbo Li & Hongfeng Zhang & Di Zhang & Haoqun Yan, 2023. "Structural Diffusion Model and Urban Green Innovation Efficiency—A Hybrid Study Based on DEA-SBM, NCA, and fsQCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-29, August.
    13. Alina-Mihaela Dima & Claudia-Elena Țuclea & Diana-Maria Vrânceanu & Gabriela Țigu, 2019. "Sustainable Social and Individual Implications of Telework: A New Insight into the Romanian Labor Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-12, June.
    14. Hokyeom Kim & Injun Choi & Jitaek Lim & Sanghyun Sung, 2022. "Business Process-Organizational Structure (BP-OS) Performance Measurement Model and Problem-Solving Guidelines for Efficient Organizational Management in an Ontact Work Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Fortuna, Fabio & Rossi, Luca & Elmo, Grazia Chiara & Arcese, Gabriella, 2023. "Italians and smart working: A technical study on the effects of smart working on the society," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    16. Gimenez-Nadal, José Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto & Velilla, Jorge, 2018. "Telework, the Timing of Work, and Instantaneous Well-Being: Evidence from Time Use Data," IZA Discussion Papers 11271, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende & Carla Curado, 2021. "Contributions to Sustainability in SMEs: Human Resources, Sustainable Product Innovation Performance and the Mediating Role of Employee Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Magnus Moglia & John Hopkins & Anne Bardoel, 2021. "Telework, Hybrid Work and the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Policy Coherence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Crowley, Frank & Daly, Hannah & Doran, Justin & Ryan, Geraldine & Caulfield, Brian, 2021. "The impact of labour market disruptions and transport choice on the environment during COVID-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 185-195.
    20. Shuiping Ding & Jie Lin & Zhenyu Zhang, 2021. "The Influences of Consumer-to-Consumer Interaction on Dissatisfactory Consumers’ Repetitive Purchases in Network Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2218-:d:750164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.