IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2109-d747981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Value of Blockchain Traceability in Supporting LCA for Textile Products

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Carrières

    (Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada)

  • Andrée-Anne Lemieux

    (Institut Français de la Mode, Sustainability Chair IFM Kering, 75013 Paris, France)

  • Manuele Margni

    (Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
    School of Engineering, HES-SO: University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, 1950 Sion, Switzerland)

  • Robert Pellerin

    (Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada)

  • Sylvain Cariou

    (Crystalchain, 75008 Paris, France)

Abstract

The efficiency of sustainability assessments of textile products is generally prevented because of a lack of available and reliable data across complex and globalized supply chains. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how blockchain traceability data can improve the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of textile products and to measure the actual value of exploiting this specific traceability data. To do so, a case study consisting of two LCAs modeling the production of wool top lots in China was conducted. A first LCA was conducted with generic data and the second with the added value of specific blockchain traceability data. Based on the second LCA, different wool top lot composition scenarios were then modeled to account for the environmental impact of different farming practices. Two main results were obtained: the environmental impact of wool top lots can vary up to +118% between two batches depending on their composition, and the specific data changes drastically from the impact calculated with generic data, with +36% calculated impact for the same wool composition of batches. Therefore, it was concluded that blockchain traceability data could be a strong asset for conducting LCA at the batch level by providing differentiated data on batch composition and origin and providing readily available specific data for a more representative assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Carrières & Andrée-Anne Lemieux & Manuele Margni & Robert Pellerin & Sylvain Cariou, 2022. "Measuring the Value of Blockchain Traceability in Supporting LCA for Textile Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2109-:d:747981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Teh & Tehmina Khan & Brian Corbitt & Chin Eang Ong, 2020. "Sustainability strategy and blockchain-enabled life cycle assessment: a focus on materials industry," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 605-622, December.
    2. Michael Wang & Bill Wang & Ahmad Abareshi, 2020. "Blockchain Technology and Its Role in Enhancing Supply Chain Integration Capability and Reducing Carbon Emission: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Johannes Sedlmeir & Hans Ulrich Buhl & Gilbert Fridgen & Robert Keller, 2020. "The Energy Consumption of Blockchain Technology: Beyond Myth," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 599-608, December.
    4. Arim Park & Huan Li, 2021. "The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed, Wafaa A.H. & MacCarthy, Bart L., 2023. "Blockchain-enabled supply chain traceability – How wide? How deep?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng Xing & Junzhu Yao, 2022. "Power Battery Echelon Utilization and Recycling Strategy for New Energy Vehicles Based on Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Yurika Pant Khanal & Abeer Alsadoon & Khurram Shahzad & Ahmad B. Al-Khalil & Penatiyana W. C. Prasad & Sabih Ur Rehman & Rafiqul Islam, 2022. "Utilizing Blockchain for IoT Privacy through Enhanced ECIES with Secure Hash Function," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Magdalena Rusch & Josef‐Peter Schöggl & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2023. "Application of digital technologies for sustainable product management in a circular economy: A review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 1159-1174, March.
    5. Seyyed-Alireza Radmanesh & Alireza Haji & Omid Fatahi Valilai, 2023. "Blockchain-Based Architecture for a Sustainable Supply Chain in Cloud Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Quanpeng Chen & Xiaogang Chen, 2023. "Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Internal and External Finance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-33, July.
    7. Chunhua Ju & Zhonghua Shen & Fuguang Bao & Pengtong Weng & Yihang Xu & Chonghuan Xu, 2022. "A Novel Credible Carbon Footprint Traceability System for Low Carbon Economy Using Blockchain Technology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Erik Karger & Marvin Jagals & Frederik Ahlemann, 2021. "Blockchain for Smart Mobility—Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Muen Uddin & Shitharth Selvarajan & Muath Obaidat & Shams Ul Arfeen & Alaa O. Khadidos & Adil O. Khadidos & Maha Abdelhaq, 2023. "From Hype to Reality: Unveiling the Promises, Challenges and Opportunities of Blockchain in Supply Chain Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Basit Shahzad & Iqra Javed & Asadullah Shaikh & Adel Sulaiman & Ahsanullah Abro & Muhammad Ali Memon, 2021. "Reliable Requirements Engineering Practices for COVID-19 Using Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Johannes Sedlmeir & Jonathan Lautenschlager & Gilbert Fridgen & Nils Urbach, 2022. "The transparency challenge of blockchain in organizations," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1779-1794, September.
    12. Bogensperger, Alexander & Zeiselmair, Andreas & Hinterstocker, Michael & Dossow, Patrick & Hilpert, Johannes & Wimmer, Maximilian & von Gneisenau, Carsten & Klausmann, Nikolas & Strüker, Jens & Urbach, 2021. "Welche Zukunft hat die Blockchain-Technologie in der Energiewirtschaft?," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 68, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    13. Michael Paul Kramer & Linda Bitsch & Jon Hanf, 2021. "Blockchain and Its Impacts on Agri-Food Supply Chain Network Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Ye, Wang & Wong, Wing-Keung & Arnone, Gioia & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Haffar, Mohamed & Faiz, Muhammad Fauzinudin, 2023. "Crypto currency and green investment impact on global environment: A time series analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 155-169.
    15. Xuda Lin & Xing Li & Sameer Kulkarni & Fu Zhao, 2021. "The Application of Blockchain-Based Life Cycle Assessment on an Industrial Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Zachary A. Collier & James H. Lambert & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Analytics and decision-making to inform public policy in response to diverse threats," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 463-464, December.
    17. Mahdi Ghaemi Asl & Oluwasegun B. Adekoya & Muhammad Mahdi Rashidi, 2023. "Quantiles dependence and dynamic connectedness between distributed ledger technology and sectoral stocks: enhancing the supply chain and investment decisions with digital platforms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 327(1), pages 435-464, August.
    18. Bernard Aritua & Clemens Wagener & Norbert Wagener & Michał Adamczak, 2021. "Blockchain Solutions for International Logistics Networks along the New Silk Road between Europe and Asia," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Jiaqi Yang & Tongxia Zhang & Waseem Alam, 2023. "Utilizing Fuzzy AHP in the Evaluation of Barriers to Blockchain Implementation in Reverse Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Swikriti Khadke & Pragya Gupta & Shanmukh Rachakunta & Chandreswar Mahata & Suma Dawn & Mohit Sharma & Deepak Verma & Aniruddha Pradhan & Ambati Mounika Sai Krishna & Seeram Ramakrishna & Sabyasachi C, 2021. "Efficient Plastic Recycling and Remolding Circular Economy Using the Technology of Trust–Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2109-:d:747981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.