IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1856-d743143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can I Get Back Later or Turn It Off? Day-Level Effect of Remote Communication Autonomy on Sustainable Proactivity

Author

Listed:
  • Yujing Liu

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Jing Du

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Jin Nam Choi

    (Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea)

  • Yuan Li

    (Business School, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)

Abstract

Overwhelming remote communication episodes have become critical daily work demands for employees. On the basis of affective event theory, this study explores the effect of daily remote communication autonomy on positive affect and proactive work behaviors. We conducted a multilevel path analysis using a general survey, followed by experience sampling methodology, with a sample of 80 employees in China who completed surveys thrice daily over a two-week period. The results showed that daily remote communication autonomy increased positive affective reactions, which, in turn, enhanced proactive work behaviors on the same workday. Furthermore, positive day-level relationships leading to employee proactivity were only significant when the employees’ person-level general techno-workload was not high. The findings provide a new perspective for managing employees working under continuous techno-workload and demands for remote interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujing Liu & Jing Du & Jin Nam Choi & Yuan Li, 2022. "Can I Get Back Later or Turn It Off? Day-Level Effect of Remote Communication Autonomy on Sustainable Proactivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1856-:d:743143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1856/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1856/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    2. Jean-François Stich & Monideepa Tarafdar & Cary Cooper & Patrick Stacey, 2017. "Workplace stress from actual and desired computer-­mediated communication use: a multi-­method study," Post-Print hal-01515123, HAL.
    3. Karim Mignonac & Olivier Herrbach, 2004. "Linking Work Events, Affective States and Attitudes an Empirical Study of Managers' Emotions," Post-Print halshs-00006026, HAL.
    4. Simon L. Albrecht & Camille R. Green & Andrew Marty, 2021. "Meaningful Work, Job Resources, and Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Pallavi & Bala, Hillol & Dey, Bidit Lal & Filieri, Raffaele, 2022. "Enforced remote working: The impact of digital platform-induced stress and remote working experience on technology exhaustion and subjective wellbeing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 269-286.
    2. Giorgia Bondanini & Gabriele Giorgi & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paola Andreucci-Annunziata, 2020. "Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-23, October.
    3. René Riedl & Harald Kindermann & Andreas Auinger & Andrija Javor, 2012. "Technostress from a Neurobiological Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(2), pages 61-69, April.
    4. Woo Jin Lee & Inho Hwang, 2021. "Sustainable Information Security Behavior Management: An Empirical Approach for the Causes of Employees’ Voice Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Payal Kumar & I.S.F. Irudayaraj & M.G. Jomon & Manish Singhal, 2013. "The Shadow of Negative Mentoring at the Workplace," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(4), pages 357-371, November.
    6. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    7. You-Kyung Lee, 2021. "Impacts of Digital Technostress and Digital Technology Self-Efficacy on Fintech Usage Intention of Chinese Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Elfenbein, Hillary Anger, 2007. "Emotion in Organizations: A Review in Stages," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt2bn0n9mv, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    9. Sadia Shakeel & Muhammad Majid Khan & Rao Aamir Ali Khan & Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, 2022. "Linking Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy and Burnout of Teachers in Public Schools: Does School Climate Play a Moderating Role?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 19-39, March.
    10. Chiara Consiglio & Nicoletta Massa & Valentina Sommovigo & Luigi Fusco, 2023. "Techno-Stress Creators, Burnout and Psychological Health among Remote Workers during the Pandemic: The Moderating Role of E-Work Self-Efficacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Hazra, Ummaha & Priyo, Asad Karim Khan, 2022. "Unethical practices in online classes during COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of affordances using routine activity theory," MPRA Paper 117853, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Oriana Ippoliti & Silvio Giovarruscio, 2017. "Technostress.Test di valutazione: il modello SOGI/Technostress. Evaluation test: SOGI Model," IRCrES Working Paper 201708, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY.
    13. Cao, Xiongfei & Yu, Lingling, 2019. "Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A three-dimension usage perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 83-92.
    14. Michael S. Aßländer, 2022. "Broken Promises – The Probable Futurity of the Laboring Class (Re-Assessed)," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 259-275, October.
    15. Wiebke Schlenger & Marlies Jöllenbeck & Tjorven Stamer & Angelika Grosse & Elke Ochsmann, 2022. "Digitizing Social Counseling—Insights for Workplace Health Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Fakhar Shahzad & Jianguo Du & Imran Khan & Adnan Fateh & Muhammad Shahbaz & Adnan Abbas & Muhammad Umair Wattoo, 2020. "Perceived Threat of COVID-19 Contagion and Frontline Paramedics’ Agonistic Behaviour: Employing a Stressor–Strain–Outcome Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.
    17. Mäntymäki, Matti & Najmul Islam, A.K.M. & Turel, Ofir & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Coping with pandemics using social network sites: A psychological detachment perspective to COVID-19 stressors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/7962 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Min Feng & Driss Bourazzouq, 2021. "Fighting Technostress: A Multiple Case Study of Three French Companies," Post-Print hal-03233561, HAL.
    20. Phoenix HH Chan & Herman HM Tse & Joshua Howard & Nathan Eva & March L To & Jing Qian & Aijing Xia, 2023. "A daily diary study on the affective path between leadership practices and leaders’ personal helping," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(3), pages 550-566, August.
    21. Zdzislawa Dacko-Pikiewicz & Jacek Wodz & Karolina Walancik-Ryba & Wojciech Pikiewicz, 2021. "Remote Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 4), pages 112-126.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1856-:d:743143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.