IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p969-d725583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability and Agricultural Regeneration in Hungarian Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Imre Kovách

    (Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
    Institute for Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, H-1097 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Boldizsár Gergely Megyesi

    (Institute for Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, H-1097 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Attila Bai

    (Institute of Applied Economics, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Péter Balogh

    (Department of Statistics and Methodology, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

Generational renewal is a core issue in European agriculture. Despite the continuous efforts of governments and the EU Council, the ageing of farmers seems an unstoppable process, accompanied by land concentration, the decrease in agricultural activity and the transformation of the European countryside. Consequently, there is a very rich scientific literature analysing the problem; a great part of it argues that the young farmer problem consists, in fact, in a number of different problems, with these problems showing huge regional differences. Hungary, as a new member state, with a heterogeneous (both fragmented and concentrated) land-use structure offers a good field to analyse generational renewal. Our paper is based on the first results of an ongoing Horizon 2020 project analysing rural regeneration. As a part of the research study, 48 semi-structured interviews were conducted with young farmers, successors of farmers and new entrants into farming. In our paper, we explore how education, access to land and family traditions influenced generational renewal and how it impacts sustainability practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Imre Kovách & Boldizsár Gergely Megyesi & Attila Bai & Péter Balogh, 2022. "Sustainability and Agricultural Regeneration in Hungarian Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:969-:d:725583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/969/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/969/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. May, Daniel & Arancibia, Sara & Behrendt, Karl & Adams, John, 2019. "Preventing young farmers from leaving the farm: Investigating the effectiveness of the young farmer payment using a behavioural approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 317-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Albiona Pestisha & Zoltán Gabnai & Aidana Chalgynbayeva & Péter Lengyel & Attila Bai, 2023. "On-Farm Renewable Energy Systems: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Marii Rasva & Evelin Jürgenson, 2022. "Europe’s Large-Scale Land Acquisitions and Bibliometric Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Krzysztof Janc & Sylwia Dołzbłasz & Andrzej Raczyk & Robert Skrzypczyński, 2023. "Winding Pathways to Rural Regeneration: Exploring Challenges and Success Factors for Three Types of Rural Changemakers in the Context of Knowledge Transfer and Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    2. Alexandros Gkatsikos & Dimitrios Natos & Christos Staboulis & Konstadinos Mattas & Michail Tsagris & Apostolos Polymeros, 2022. "An Impact Assessment of the Young Farmers Scheme Policy on Regional Growth in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Berna Türkekul & Canan Fisun Abay, 2024. "Understanding Why Farmers Leave: Validating Key Indicators for Farm Exit in İzmir, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Sharina Shariff & Siti ‘Aisyah Baharudin & Nor Asmat Ismail, 2025. "A Systematic Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Agriculture Economic Sector in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(1), pages 285-303.
    5. Ogawa, Keishi & Garrod, Guy & Yagi, Hironori, 2023. "Sustainability strategies and stakeholder management for upland farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Isabeau Coopmans & Joost Dessein & Francesco Accatino & Federico Antonioli & Camelia Gavrilescu & Piotr Gradziuk & Gordana Manevska‐Tasevska & Miranda Meuwissen & Mariya Peneva & Bárbara Soriano & Jul, 2020. "Policy directions to support generational renewal in European farming systems," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 30-36, August.
    7. Bojnec, Štefan & Fertő, Imre, 2022. "Do different types of Common Agricultural Policy subsidies promote farm employment?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Para Jansuwan & Kerstin K. Zander, 2021. "Getting Young People to Farm: How Effective Is Thailand’s Young Smart Farmer Programme?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Yuanyuan Zhu & Yukuan Wang & Bin Fu & Qin Liu & Ming Li & Kun Yan, 2021. "How Are Rural Youths’ Agricultural Skills? Empirical Results and Implications in Southwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Dudek, Michał & Pawłowska, Aleksandra, 2022. "Can succession improve the economic situation of family farms in the short term? Evidence from Poland based on panel data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Anthony Siaw & Yuansheng Jiang & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Wonder Agbenyo, 2020. "The Impact of Internet Use on Income: The Case of Rural Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Unay‐Gailhard, İlkay & Brennan, Mark A., 2023. "Young farmers in “The New World of Work”: The contribution of new media to the work engagement and professional identities," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 88(2), pages 426-460.
    13. Karahan, Mizgin & Abay, Canan & Ito, Ryoji, 2023. "Determining Factors of Retaining Young Farmers in Agriculture: A Case study in Turkey and Japan," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(2), June.
    14. Eugenia A. Petropoulou & Vasiliki Petousi, 2024. "Social Capital, Trust, and Cultivation of Bioenergy Crops: Evidence from Germany and Greece," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Prince, Nick & Maye, Damian & Ilbery, Brian & Kirwan, James, 2022. "‘Real’ regulation and property relations on agricultural estates: Reducing opportunities for new entrants to agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Qiangqiang Zhang & Jiaying Tian & Jie Zheng & Nazir Muhammad Abdullahi & Xuexi Huo, 2022. "How Does Land Tenure Security Affect Farm Succession? Evidence from Apple Growers in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Zuzana Hlouskova & Marie Prasilova, 2020. "Economic outcomes in relation to farmers' age in the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(4), pages 149-159.
    18. Hongyu Wang & Apurbo Sarkar & Lu Qian, 2021. "Evaluations of the Roles of Organizational Support, Organizational Norms and Organizational Learning for Adopting Environmentally Friendly Technologies: A Case of Kiwifruit Farmers’ Cooperatives of Me," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Foguesatto, Cristian Rogério & Mores, Giana de Vargas & Dalmutt Kruger, Silvana & Costa, Carlos, 2020. "Will I have a potential successor? Factors influencing family farming succession in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Christos Staboulis & Dimitrios Natos & Alexandros Gkatsikos & Efthimia Tsakiridou & Konstadinos Mattas & Waldemar Bojar & Piotr Baranowski & Jaromir Krzyszczak & Obdulia Parra Rivero & Álvaro Ojeda Ro, 2022. "Assessing the Role of the Young Farmer Scheme in the Export Orientation of Greek Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:969-:d:725583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.