IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16873-d1005069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of the Quality Gaps in the Services Offered in Accommodation Facilities in Rural Areas: The Case of the Lublin Region

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Wojciechowska-Solis

    (Department of Agritourism and Rural Development, Faculty of Agrobioengineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Magdalena Śmiglak-Krajewska

    (Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Domenico Viti

    (Department of Law, University of Foggia, Largo Giovanni Paolo II, 71100 Foggia, Italy)

Abstract

The quality of services offered in accommodation facilities is one of the factors determining the development of this business activity. Therefore, it is necessary to constantly examine the level of customer satisfaction, their expectations and needs. The systematic collection and analysis of the opinions of tourists make it possible to learn about their changing expectations and allows the service providers to adapt to them. The purpose of the research that constituted the basis of this article was to identify the quality gaps in the services provided in the accommodation facilities in rural areas of the region of Lublin. The Servqual method was used in the study, thanks to which it was possible to assess the quality criteria and the validity of the provided service. A total of 699 respondents took part in the research. According to the study, the reliability and timeliness of the service, the adherence to the terms and conditions of the service, as well as the willingness to solve customers’ problems, were of the greatest importance for the clients, while the completeness and reliability of the advertising materials turned out to be the least important. With the obtained results, it can be concluded that the expectations of the customers in the accommodation facilities in rural areas exceed the actual state of the offered services. The areas that need to be improved, such as reliability and empathy, were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Magdalena Śmiglak-Krajewska & Domenico Viti, 2022. "Identification of the Quality Gaps in the Services Offered in Accommodation Facilities in Rural Areas: The Case of the Lublin Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16873-:d:1005069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16873/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16873/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amanor-Boadu, Vincent, 2013. "Diversification Decisions in Agriculture: The Case of Agritourism in Kansas," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Antonietta Ivona, 2021. "Sustainability of Rural Tourism and Promotion of Local Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-7, August.
    3. R. Chumpitaz & N. Paparoidamis, 2007. "Service quality, relationship satisfaction, trust, commitment, and business-to-business loyalty," Post-Print hal-00199063, HAL.
    4. Miklós Pakurár & Hossam Haddad & János Nagy & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2019. "The Service Quality Dimensions that Affect Customer Satisfaction in the Jordanian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Antonio Santoro & Martina Venturi & Mauro Agnoletti, 2020. "Agricultural Heritage Systems and Landscape Perception among Tourists. The Case of Lamole, Chianti (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Rosa Maria Fanelli & Luca Romagnoli, 2020. "Customer Satisfaction with Farmhouse Facilities and Its Implications for the Promotion of Agritourism Resources in Italian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Ramona Ciolac & Tiberiu Iancu & Ioan Brad & Gabriela Popescu & Diana Marin & Tabita Adamov, 2020. "Agritourism Activity—A “Smart Chance” for Mountain Rural Environment’s Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Alaa M. S. Azazz & Faleh A. Ameen & Sameh Fayyad, 2022. "Agritourism and Peer-to-Peer Accommodation: A Moderated Mediation Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tamara Gajić & Filip Đoković & Ivana Blešić & Marko D. Petrović & Milan M. Radovanović & Dragan Vukolić & Marija Mandarić & Goran Dašić & Julia A. Syromiatnikova & Andrej Mićović, 2023. "Pandemic Boosts Prospects for Recovery of Rural Tourism in Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dora Isabel Rodrigues Ferreira & José-Manuel Sánchez-Martín, 2022. "Agricultural Landscapes as a Basis for Promoting Agritourism in Cross-Border Iberian Regions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Boncinelli, Fabio & Bartolini, Fabio & Casini, Leonardo, 2018. "Structural factors of labour allocation for farm diversification activities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 204-212.
    3. Yi Mei & Xiaoyan Xu & Xiaodong Li, 2020. "Encouraging Patient Engagement Behaviors from the Perspective of Functional Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison, 2023. "Applying a Combination of SEM and fsQCA to Predict Tourist Resource-Saving Behavioral Intentions in Rural Tourism: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Shakiba Ghadir Jamal Abad & Jalali Seyed Hossein, 2013. "Conceptualization Of Customer Based Brand Equity In Financial Service Sector," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 8(1), pages 123-133, April.
    7. Maria Anna Bertolino & Federica Corrado, 2021. "Rethinking Terraces and Dry-Stone Walls in the Alps for Sustainable Development: The Case of Mombarone/Alto Eporediese in Piedmont Region (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Cosmin Alin Popescu & Tiberiu Iancu & Gabriela Popescu & Tabita Adamov & Ramona Ciolac, 2023. "The Impact of Agritourism Activity on the Rural Environment: Findings from an Authentic Agritourist Area—Bukovina, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Eunji Oh & M. Minsuk Shin, 2020. "Study Abroad in Support of Higher Education Sustainability: An Application of Service Trade Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Yu-Te Tu & Yu-Yi Chang, 2011. "Relationships among Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in Chain Restaurant," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 3(5), pages 273-282.
    12. Faisal Mohammed O. Almaslukh & Haliyana Khalid & Alaa Mahdi Sahi, 2022. "The Impact of Internal Marketing Practices on Employees’ Job Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of the Saudi Arabian Banking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Zhenjie Wang & Chunling Zhu & Shanwu Tian & Ping Li, 2019. "Differentiation and pricing power of online retailers," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Jinsoo Hwang & Seongseop (Sam) Kim & Insin Kim & Seulgi Park, 2023. "Factors Affecting the Memorable Experiences of Chinese Customers in Duty-Free Shopping," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    15. Simona-Mihaela TRIF, 2012. "Antecedents and consequences of relationship quality. A case study of banking sector in Romania," Timisoara Journal of Economics, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 5(18), pages 253-271.
    16. Sara Parry & Paul Westhead, 2016. "Mobilizing relationship marketing to ensure venture development in a rural resource-constrained bilingual context: The case of Draig Technology Limited," Working Papers 16002, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    17. Thomas Streifeneder & Christian Hoffmann & Philipp Corradini, 2023. "The future of agritourism? A review of current trends of touristic commercialisation in rural areas," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 93-119, August.
    18. Abang Zainoren Abang Abdurahman & Syerina Azlin Md Nasir & Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob & Serah Jaya & Suhaili Mokhtar, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Clustering of Sarawak Malaysia Total Protected Area Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Yihan Huang & Daehwan Kim, 2023. "How Does Service Quality Improve Consumer Loyalty in Sports Fitness Centers? The Moderating Role of Sport Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, August.
    20. Emmanuel Silva Quaye & Cleopatra Taoana & Russell Abratt & Peter Anabila, 2022. "Customer advocacy and brand loyalty: the mediating roles of brand relationship quality and trust," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 363-382, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16873-:d:1005069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.