IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16666-d1001594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogenic Production of Thiosulfate from Organic and Inorganic Sulfur Substrates for Application to Gold Leaching

Author

Listed:
  • James McNeice

    (Hydrometallurgy and Environment Group, Robert M. Buchan Department of Mining, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Harshit Mahandra

    (Hydrometallurgy and Environment Group, Robert M. Buchan Department of Mining, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Ahmad Ghahreman

    (Hydrometallurgy and Environment Group, Robert M. Buchan Department of Mining, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

Abstract

Gold mining and processing is an activity with large environmental impact due to the low concentration of gold in ore deposits and chemical resistance to most chemicals. Over 75% of gold is leached from ores using cyanide, however less toxic lixiviants have been proposed in the literature. Thiosulfate is one of these alternative reagents, but high reagent consumption has slowed acceptance in mining operations. Reducing the cost and impact of thiosulfate production is a way to reduce the cost of reagent consumption during leaching. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of leaching gold from ore with biogenic thiosulfate. Biogenic thiosulfate was produced using a marine methylotroph bacterium from three substrates: sodium sulfide, elemental sulfur, and dimethyl sulfide for application in bioleaching. The different substrates were evaluated to determine conversion efficiency from the sulfur source to biogenic thiosulfate and verified by titration and ion chromatography. Optimal conditions for conversion to thiosulfate were determined to be in the range of pH = 7–8, 25–30 °C, with sodium sulfide as a substrate in a sealed system to prevent sulfide from escaping as hydrogen sulfide gas. An oxide gold ore with a grade of 4.02 g/t was selected as a gold source for leaching experiments. The leaching of gold using the biogenic thiosulfate was compared with chemical thiosulfate solutions under experimental conditions of pH = 9.5, 50 mg/L copper, 500 RPM mixing, and 0.1 L/min air. The efficiency of gold bioleaching was measured using flame atomic absorption spectroscopy and fire assay. Gold extraction efficiencies ranging from 20–60% were achieved using the biogenic thiosulfate, and 27–77% with sodium thiosulfate solutions, respectively. It was concluded that the sodium sulfide substrate was best for producing higher biogenic thiosulfate concentrations and leaching efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • James McNeice & Harshit Mahandra & Ahmad Ghahreman, 2022. "Biogenic Production of Thiosulfate from Organic and Inorganic Sulfur Substrates for Application to Gold Leaching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16666-:d:1001594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16666/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16666/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Tost & Benjamin Bayer & Michael Hitch & Stephan Lutter & Peter Moser & Susanne Feiel, 2018. "Metal Mining’s Environmental Pressures: A Review and Updated Estimates on CO 2 Emissions, Water Use, and Land Requirements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Thomashausen, Sophie & Maennling, Nicolas & Mebratu-Tsegaye, Tehtena, 2018. "A comparative overview of legal frameworks governing water use and waste water discharge in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 143-151.
    3. Guiomar Calvo & Gavin Mudd & Alicia Valero & Antonio Valero, 2016. "Decreasing Ore Grades in Global Metallic Mining: A Theoretical Issue or a Global Reality?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Larona S. Teseletso & Tsuyoshi Adachi, 2022. "Long-Term Sustainability of Copper and Iron Based on a System Dynamics Model," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Lèbre, Éléonore & Owen, John R. & Kemp, Deanna & Valenta, Rick K., 2022. "Complex orebodies and future global metal supply: An introduction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Marie K. Schellens & Johanna Gisladottir, 2018. "Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-28, December.
    4. David Talbot & Guillaume Barbat, 2020. "Water disclosure in the mining sector: An assessment of the credibility of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1241-1251, May.
    5. Valentin Goldberg & Ali Dashti & Robert Egert & Binil Benny & Thomas Kohl & Fabian Nitschke, 2023. "Challenges and Opportunities for Lithium Extraction from Geothermal Systems in Germany—Part 3: The Return of the Extraction Brine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Sören Lars Nungesser & Stefan Pauliuk, 2022. "Modelling Hazard for Tailings Dam Failures at Copper Mines in Global Supply Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
    7. Elshkaki, Ayman, 2019. "Material-energy-water-carbon nexus in China’s electricity generation system up to 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Nadine Rötzer & Mario Schmidt, 2020. "Historical, Current, and Future Energy Demand from Global Copper Production and Its Impact on Climate Change," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-31, April.
    9. Mohamad Issa & Adrian Ilinca & Daniel R. Rousse & Loïc Boulon & Philippe Groleau, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Decarbonization in the Canadian Mining Industry: Opportunities and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Luis de la Torre Palacios & José Antonio Espí Rodríguez & Paulo Romero Martinez, 2021. "Economic, technological and sustainability-based qualifications with reference to Europe: Iberia’s new metal mining projects," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 34(2), pages 277-304, July.
    11. Eirik Nøst Nedkvitne & Dag Øistein Eriksen & Jon Petter Omtvedt, 2023. "Grade and Tonnage Comparison of Anthropogenic Raw Materials and Ores for Cu, Zn, and Pb Recovery," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-9, February.
    12. Simon Meißner, 2021. "The Impact of Metal Mining on Global Water Stress and Regional Carrying Capacities—A GIS-Based Water Impact Assessment," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-34, November.
    13. Nadine Rötzer & Mario Schmidt, 2018. "Decreasing Metal Ore Grades—Is the Fear of Resource Depletion Justified?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Ingmar Jürgens & Stefanie Berendsen & Katharina Erdmann & Karsten Neuhoff, 2020. "Issues Paper about How to Design Climate Bonds for the Steel and Selected Non-Ferrous Metals Sectors," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 127, number pbk149, September.
    15. Marc van der Meide & Carina Harpprecht & Stephen Northey & Yongxiang Yang & Bernhard Steubing, 2022. "Effects of the energy transition on environmental impacts of cobalt supply: A prospective life cycle assessment study on future supply of cobalt," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1631-1645, October.
    16. Sandisiwe Khanyisa Thisani & Daramy Vondi Von Kallon & Patrick Byrne, 2020. "Geochemical Classification of Global Mine Water Drainage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Margaret Insley & Yichun Huang, 2020. "The economics of water conservation regulations under uncertainty: An application to Alberta's Lower Athabasca River Region," Working Papers 2003, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2020.
    18. Patrick Moriarty & Damon Honnery, 2020. "New Approaches for Ecological and Social Sustainability in a Post-Pandemic World," World, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16666-:d:1001594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.