IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16532-d999013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rise of MCS and EMA in the Sustainable Field: A Systematic Literature Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tiantian Wang

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Kamisah Ismail

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

  • Khairul Saidah Abas Azmi

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia)

Abstract

Sustainable development is becoming increasingly popular in all fields and the importance of sustainability and business issues will grow. Despite the increase in scholarly attention paid to improving organizational sustainability performance, such as Management Control Systems (MCS) and Environmental Management Accounting (EMA), few studies have been conducted on the relationship between MCS and EMA, with no aggregation of findings and knowledge. To fill this void, this study conducted a systematic literature review of the MCS and EMA in the field of sustainability. A comprehensive search was conducted for journal articles that addressed MCS and EMA issues in the context of sustainability. Considering that EMA and MCS are more widely used in manufacturing, this study focuses on the manufacturing industry. Based on rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, 43 journal articles were selected for the final analysis. The bibliometric data from the identified studies, their theoretical and methodological approaches, research themes, and research backgrounds were analyzed in this review. As a result, this study identifies existing gaps in the current literature, provides directions for the organization to research internal systems’ interactions and suggests future research directions with specific research agendas.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiantian Wang & Kamisah Ismail & Khairul Saidah Abas Azmi, 2022. "The Rise of MCS and EMA in the Sustainable Field: A Systematic Literature Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16532-:d:999013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16532/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16532/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agus Ismaya Hasanudin & Yuliansyah Yuliansyah & Jamaliah Said & Christin Susilowati & Muafi, 2019. "Management control system, corporate social responsibility, and firm performance," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1354-1368, March.
    2. Walid Cheffi & Ahmed Abdel-Maksoud & Muhammad Omer Farooq, 2021. "CSR initiatives, organizational performance and the mediating role of integrating CSR into management control systems: Testing an inclusive model within SMEs in an emerging economy," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 333-367, September.
    3. Bismark Kusi Appiah & Zhang Donghui & Shapan Chandra Majumder & Malepekola Precious Monaheng, 2020. "Effects of Environmental Strategy, Uncertainty and Top Management Commitment on the Environmental Performance: Role of Environmental Management Accounting and Environmental Management Control System," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 360-370.
    4. Shanyong Wang & Hualong Wang & Jing Wang, 2019. "Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: Do top management support and perceived benefit work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 233-243, January.
    5. Delphine Gibassier & Simon Alcouffe, 2018. "Environmental Management Accounting: The Missing Link to Sustainability?," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Grewal, Jody & Serafeim, George, 2020. "Research on Corporate Sustainability: Review and Directions for Future Research," Foundations and Trends(R) in Accounting, now publishers, vol. 14(2), pages 73-127, September.
    7. Stefan Schaltegger, 2011. "Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 33(1), pages 15-28, April.
    8. Ahmed Abdel-Maksoud & Mirna Jabbour & Magdy Abdel-Kader, 2021. "Stakeholder pressure, eco-control systems, and firms’ performance: empirical evidence from UK manufacturers," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 30-57, January.
    9. Maria Jell‐Ojobor & Aveed Raha, 2022. "Being good at being good—The mediating role of an environmental management system in value‐creating green supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1964-1984, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leanne Johnstone, 2021. "Facilitating sustainability control in SMEs through the implementation of an environmental management system," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 559-605, December.
    2. Armando Della Porta & Francesco De Luca & Chiara Aufiero, 2023. ""Radicare" la sostenibilit? nella strategia attraverso i sistemi di management control: un caso di studio relativo ad una Pmi," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2), pages 43-68.
    3. Chris A. Kelsall, 2020. "Ecological Management Accounting—Taking into Account Sustainability, Does Accounting Have Far to Travel?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Qamar Farooq & Jie Hao & Xuan Liu & Di Xiao & Yunhong Hao, 2020. "Social and environmental development: Fresh concepts and soft measures towards sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1796-1803, November.
    5. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Natalia Semenova, 2021. "Management control systems in response to social and environmental risk in large Nordic companies," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    8. Fangqing Zhang & Xiaolong Wu & Shujun Zhang, 2022. "Exploring the Continuous Motivation of Algorithm Engineers under Multiple Objectives: A Mixed-Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    10. Hyun Ah Kim & Nam Chul Jung, 2022. "Related Party Transactions and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Nikunj Kumar Jain & Abinash Panda & Piyush Choudhary, 2020. "Institutional pressures and circular economy performance: The role of environmental management system and organizational flexibility in oil and gas sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3509-3525, December.
    12. Tetiana Vlasenko & Anatolii Hatsko & Tetiana Larina & Yevhen Hryn & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
    13. Andrea Stübner & Svenja Jarchow, 2023. "Family oblige: the link between CSR and succession intention in small and medium family firms," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 389-431, April.
    14. Agus Joko Pramono & Suwarno & Firdaus Amyar & Renny Friska, 2023. "Sustainability Management Accounting in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Performance Auditing in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Piero Mella & Michela Pellicelli, 2017. "How Myopia Archetypes Lead to Non-Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Yusheng Kong & Fahad Javed & Jahanzaib Sultan & Muhammad Shehzad Hanif & Noheed Khan, 2022. "EMA Implementation and Corporate Environmental Firm Performance: A Comparison of Institutional Pressures and Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Nor'Aini Yusof & Amin Akhavan Tabassi & Ernawati Mustafa Kamal, 2020. "Do environmental, economic and reputational advantages strengthen green practices' impact on environmental performance?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2081-2093, September.
    18. A.D. Nuwan Gunarathne & Ki‐Hoon Lee & Pubudu K. Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, 2021. "Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 825-839, February.
    19. Venugopal Gopalakrishna‐Remani & Kyung‐Ah ( Kay) Byun & D. Harold Doty, 2022. "The impact of employees' perceptions about top management engagement on sustainability development efforts and firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2964-2977, November.
    20. S. Taniguchi, Kazuhiro, 2022. "Why Fukushima? A diachronic and multilevel comparative institutional analysis of a nuclear disaster," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16532-:d:999013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.