IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16324-d995645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmers’ Perception of Tourism in Sustainable Development of Forests and Their Decisions in China: The Sustainability of the Prism Model and SEM Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiafang Hong

    (School of Culture & Tourism, Yuzhang Normal University, Nanchang 300103, China)

  • Cheng He

    (Department of Criminal Investigation, Nanjing Forest Police College, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

The sustainable development of forests involves a combination of environmental protection and economics. Ecotourism is a new and growing sustainable economic model for forests, compared with the traditional utilization and protection of forests. The purpose of this study was to explore the applicability of the Prism model and SEM model in seeking to understand farmers’ perceptions and decision-making regarding tourism, so as to fully understand farmers’ thinking and behavior around forest tourism, and to truly make them in harmony with the sustainable development of forests. In this study, based on a field investigation of 392 farmers living in 11 national forest parks in Jiangxi Province, China, three hypotheses were constructed using the SEM model; and then six first-level indicators and 15 s-level indicators were constructed based on the Prism model, to verify the cognition and influencing factors for farmers, regarding sustainable forest tourism. The results showed that (1) the formation process of farmers’ willingness to adapt to forest tourism follows the path of “individual cognition → individual behavior”. (2) Economic influences, social culture, environmental cognition, and institutional cognition all have significant positive effects on their adaptive willingness. (3) Farmers’ cognition of economic life, environmental protection, and social culture lead to significant differences in their cognition and adaptability to forest tourism. These findings highlight the importance of the perceived value of tourism in assessing how tourism develops, as well as whether it is sustainable for the forest and its impacts. This study provides a better understanding of the factors that influence farmers’ attitudes towards tourism and highlights the importance of valuing local communities as important players in sustainable development, especially as this boosts the economy in forests.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiafang Hong & Cheng He, 2022. "Farmers’ Perception of Tourism in Sustainable Development of Forests and Their Decisions in China: The Sustainability of the Prism Model and SEM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16324-:d:995645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16324/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16324/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiu, Yen-Ting Helena & Lee, Wan-I. & Chen, Tsung-Hsiung, 2014. "Environmentally responsible behavior in ecotourism: Antecedents and implications," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 321-329.
    2. Bishnu Prasad Gautam Ph.D., 2011. "Tourism and Economic Growth in Nepal," NRB Economic Review, Nepal Rastra Bank, Research Department, vol. 23(2), pages 18-30, October.
    3. Pillutla, Madan M. & Chen, Xiao-Ping, 1999. "Social Norms and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Effects of Context and Feedback, , ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 81-103, May.
    4. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Violeta Sima & Elvira Nica & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe, 2017. "Measuring Sustainable Competitiveness in Contemporary Economies—Insights from European Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Sharpley, Richard, 2014. "Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 37-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lishan Xu & Changlin Ao & Baoqi Liu & Zhenyu Cai, 2023. "Ecotourism and sustainable development: a scientometric review of global research trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 2977-3003, April.
    2. Biljana Petrevska & Tanja Mihalič, 2020. "(Un)Sustainable And (Ir)Responsible Tourism In Ohrid: Residents’ Perception," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 11(2), pages 202-212.
    3. Biljana Petrevska & Aleksandra Terzić & Cvetko Andreeski, 2020. "More or Less Sustainable? Assessment from a Policy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Jordan, Evan J. & Spencer, Daniel M. & Prayag, Girish, 2019. "Tourism impacts, emotions and stress," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 213-226.
    5. Wilawan Jansri, 2019. "Perception of Residents, Community Participation and Support for Tourism Development in the Old Town Muang Songkhla, Thailand," Proceedings of the 13th International RAIS Conference, June 10-11, 2019 07WJ, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    6. Dana Kiseľáková & Beáta Šofranková & Veronika Čabinová & Erika Onuferová, 2018. "Competitiveness and sustainable growth analysis of the EU countries with the use of Global Indexes' methodology," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(3), pages 581-599, March.
    7. Vegas-Macias, Jordi, 2025. "Social contact and value co-creation practices. Tourist–resident encounters and urban cycling in Copenhagen," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Salvatore Bimonte & Antonella D’Agostino, 2021. "Tourism development and residents’ well-being: Comparing two seaside destinations in Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1508-1525, November.
    9. Hal R. Arkes & John H. Kagel & Dimitry Mezhvinsky, 2017. "Effects of a Management–Labor Context and Team Play on Ultimatum Game Outcomes," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(4), pages 993-1011, April.
    10. Jelena DURKIN BADURINA & Daniela SOLDIC FRLETA & Larry DWYER, 2022. "Meet Sceptics, Neutrals And Believers: An Alternative Approach To Analysing Residents’ Attitudes Towards Tourism In Urban Destinations," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 24-44, February.
    11. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Fernando Almeida-García & Rafael Cortes-Macías & Antonia Balbuena-Vázquez & M. Carmen-Hidalgo, 2020. "New Perspectives of Residents’ Perceptions in a Mature Seaside Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Oksana Tokarchuk & Roberto Gabriele & Oswin Maurer, 2016. "Tourism intensity impact on satisfaction with life of German residents," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(6), pages 1315-1331, December.
    14. Su, Lujun & Swanson, Scott R., 2017. "The effect of destination social responsibility on tourist environmentally responsible behavior: Compared analysis of first-time and repeat tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 308-321.
    15. Lei Zhou & Jing Zhao & Jinghao Wang, 2024. "Place Attachment or Novel Experience? Enablers of Recreationists’ Environmentally Responsible Behavior in Scenic Spots," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    16. Asli D.A. Tasci & Gurhan Aktas & Fulya Acikgoz, 2021. "Cultural Differences In Hospitableness: A Study In Turkish Culture," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 27(2), pages 339-361, July.
    17. repec:osf:osfxxx:yfaw2_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Rose Ann A. Villarias & Kristin Iris G. Estores, 2021. "Resort Management Practices and Tourism Impacts of an Island Resort in Negros Occidental," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 823-845, September.
    19. Chang Liu & Mingshui Lin & Xinhua Qi & Wenjuan Zheng, 2021. "Estimating the Preservation Value of Wuyishan National Park from the Perspective of Bounded Rational Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Dufwenberg, Martin & Gächter, Simon & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike, 2011. "The framing of games and the psychology of play," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 459-478.
    21. Krupka, Erin & Weber, Roberto A., 2009. "The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 307-320, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16324-:d:995645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.