IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16251-d994503.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Campus Managers’ Role in Innovation Implementation for Sustainability on Dutch University Campuses

Author

Listed:
  • Mathilda du Preez

    (Department of Management in the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 134, 2628 Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Monique H. Arkesteijn

    (Department of Management in the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 134, 2628 Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Alexandra C. den Heijer

    (Department of Management in the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 134, 2628 Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Małgorzata Rymarzak

    (Department of Investment and Real Estate, University of Gdansk, Armii Krajowej 101, 81-824 Sopot, Poland)

Abstract

Internationally, the ambition to achieve a sustainable built environment is becoming urgent. On the university campus, this vision, combined with unparalleled access to innovative technologies for sustainable development enables/urges universities to implement more innovative solutions more often. As a prime test location, the university campus is uniquely able to serve as a context for living labs, implementing and testing innovative technologies in a real-world environment. However, implementation of innovation on campus requires a clear vision, intentional action and transdisciplinary collaboration, while innovations themselves pose several challenges to the business-as-usual way of work. To explore the role of campus real estate managers in innovation implementation decisions on the university campus, a literature review and a qualitative study among campus managers of 13 Dutch universities were conducted. The research explored the innovation project types, risks, drivers and barriers and the real estate management responsibilities and decision criteria in innovation implementation projects. As one of the outputs of this research, a comprehensive categorization framework was developed. It clarifies campus managers’ decision-making dimensions for innovative sustainability project implementation on campus and highlights the sustainability objectives unique to universities. If implemented across universities, it could further strengthen the networked economy by identifying opportunities for cross-campus implementation of innovative projects for sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathilda du Preez & Monique H. Arkesteijn & Alexandra C. den Heijer & Małgorzata Rymarzak, 2022. "Campus Managers’ Role in Innovation Implementation for Sustainability on Dutch University Campuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16251-:d:994503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16251/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16251/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aksel Ersoy & Ellen van Bueren, 2020. "Challenges of Urban Living Labs towards the Future of Local Innovation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 89-100.
    2. René Schils & Bert Philipsen & Nyncke Hoekstra & Gertjan Holshof & Ronald Zom & Idse Hoving & Kees van Reenen & Marcia Stienezen & Cindy Klootwijk & Joop van der Werf & Léon Sebek & Nick van Eekeren &, 2019. "Amazing Grazing: A Public and Private Partnership to Stimulate Grazing Practices in Intensive Dairy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Yawei Du & Monique H. Arkesteijn & Alexandra C. den Heijer & Kun Song, 2020. "Sustainable Assessment Tools for Higher Education Institutions: Guidelines for Developing a Tool for China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-30, August.
    4. Paul Save & Belgin Terim Cavka & Thomas Froese, 2021. "Evaluation and Lessons Learned from a Campus as a Living Lab Program to Promote Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Katharina Greve & Riccardo De Vita & Seppo Leminen & Mika Westerlund, 2021. "Living Labs: From Niche to Mainstream Innovation Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Lawrence Phillips & Carlos Bana e Costa, 2007. "Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 51-68, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Stuckrath & Maryse M. H. Chappin & Ernst Worrell, 2025. "What Drives Successful Campus Living Labs? The Case of Utrecht University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Bini & Milena Vainieri & Sabina Nuti, 2015. "Definizione delle priorit? di intervento in sanit?: approcci socio-tecnici a confronto," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(93), pages 49-73.
    2. Adriana Del Borghi & Thomas Spiegelhalter & Luca Moreschi & Michela Gallo, 2021. "Carbon-Neutral-Campus Building: Design Versus Retrofitting of Two University Zero Energy Buildings in Europe and in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. William B. Haskell & Wenjie Huang & Huifu Xu, 2018. "Preference Elicitation and Robust Optimization with Multi-Attribute Quasi-Concave Choice Functions," Papers 1805.06632, arXiv.org.
    4. Kurth, Margaret & Keisler, Jeffrey M. & Bates, Matthew E. & Bridges, Todd S. & Summers, Jeffrey & Linkov, Igor, 2017. "A portfolio decision analysis approach to support energy research and development resource allocation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 128-135.
    5. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    6. Meinard, Y. & Tsoukiàs, A., 2019. "On the rationality of decision aiding processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 1074-1084.
    7. Ramiro Sanchez-Lopez & Carlos Bana e Costa & Bernard Baets, 2012. "The MACBETH approach for multi-criteria evaluation of development projects on cross-cutting issues," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 393-408, October.
    8. Ting Zhou & Rob Law & Patrick C. Lee, 2021. "Exploring Sustainable Measurements of Academic Research: How Do Faculty Members in Teaching-Oriented Universities of China Evaluate Good Research in Tourism and Hospitality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Salvatore F. Pileggi, 2019. "Is the World Becoming a Better or a Worse Place? A Data-Driven Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Erick Elysio Reis Amorim & Monique Menezes & Karoline Vitória Gonçalves Fernandes, 2022. "Urban Living Labs and Critical Infrastructure Resilience: A Global Match?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Tom Pape, 2020. "Prioritising data items for business analytics: Framework and application to human resources," Papers 2012.13813, arXiv.org.
    12. Bana e Costa, Carlos A. & Oliveira, Mónica D., 2012. "A multicriteria decision analysis model for faculty evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 424-436.
    13. Angelis, Aris & Kanavos, Panos, 2017. "Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 137-156.
    14. Yawei Du & Qing Ye & Hongjiang Liu & Yuting Wu & Fenghua Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Assessment Tools for Higher Education Institutions: Developing Two-Hierarchy Tools for China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Alberto Franco, L., 2013. "Rethinking Soft OR interventions: Models as boundary objects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(3), pages 720-733.
    16. F A F Ferreira & S P Santos & P M M Rodrigues, 2011. "Adding value to bank branch performance evaluation using cognitive maps and MCDA: a case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(7), pages 1320-1333, July.
    17. Caspary, Georg, 2009. "Gauging the future competitiveness of renewable energy in Colombia," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 443-449, May.
    18. Rodrigues, Teresa C. & Montibeller, Gilberto & Oliveira, Mónica D. & Bana e Costa, Carlos A., 2017. "Modelling multicriteria value interactions with Reasoning Maps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1054-1071.
    19. Edgar Mascarenhas & Mónica D. Oliveira, 2025. "Correction to: Leveraging Group Decision Aiding with Decision Conferencing: A Systematic Review and a Roadmap for Future Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 435-438, June.
    20. Tom Pape, 2020. "Value of agreement in decision analysis: Concept, measures and application," Papers 2012.13816, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16251-:d:994503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.