IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5506-d1679285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Drives Successful Campus Living Labs? The Case of Utrecht University

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Stuckrath

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80125, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Maryse M. H. Chappin

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80125, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Ernst Worrell

    (Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80125, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Campus living labs (CLLs) foster sustainability within higher education institutions (HEIs), yet their institutional embedding remains challenging. Relying on the idea of strategic niche management (SNM), this paper examines three processes key to protected space development: vision articulation, social network building, and learning. This research explores the factors that enable the development of protected spaces for successful CLLs. Using an embedded case study approach, seven sustainability initiatives were analysed at Utrecht University, the Netherlands. We found that the perceived success in CLLs is related to sustainability outcomes, scaling pathways, and process outcomes. In addition, different groups of factors driving the development of protected spaces were identified: broad factors that contribute to all or multiple key processes, specific factors that support only one process, and peripheral factors that were less frequently mentioned. ‘Organisational culture’ appeared to be an important broad factor contributing to all key processes. ‘Resources’ and ‘Coordination’ were also important, specifically for social network building, but also mentioned as currently being absent by many. Finally, this paper contributes by incorporating a new factor, ‘Orchestration’, a subtle yet strategic form of coordination. It offers insights for HEIs aiming to develop CLLs as part of their sustainability strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Stuckrath & Maryse M. H. Chappin & Ernst Worrell, 2025. "What Drives Successful Campus Living Labs? The Case of Utrecht University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5506-:d:1679285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5506/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5506/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Verena Radinger-Peer & Gesa Pflitsch & Helga Kanning & Daniel Schiller, 2021. "Establishing the Regional Sustainable Developmental Role of Universities—From the Multilevel-Perspective (MLP) and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Mathilda du Preez & Monique H. Arkesteijn & Alexandra C. den Heijer & Małgorzata Rymarzak, 2022. "Campus Managers’ Role in Innovation Implementation for Sustainability on Dutch University Campuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Paskaleva, Krassimira & Cooper, Ian, 2021. "Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Paul Save & Belgin Terim Cavka & Thomas Froese, 2021. "Evaluation and Lessons Learned from a Campus as a Living Lab Program to Promote Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sphokazi Phelokazi Mbatha & Josephine Kaviti Musango, 2022. "A Systematic Review on the Application of the Living Lab Concept and Role of Stakeholders in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Adriana Del Borghi & Thomas Spiegelhalter & Luca Moreschi & Michela Gallo, 2021. "Carbon-Neutral-Campus Building: Design Versus Retrofitting of Two University Zero Energy Buildings in Europe and in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Molinari, Marco & Anund Vogel, Jonas & Rolando, Davide & Lundqvist, Per, 2023. "Using living labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    4. Oliver Weberg & Vaike Fors & Jesper Lund, 2025. "Scaling Deep with Local Community Champions in Living Labs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Ananya Tiwari & Luís Campos Rodrigues & Frances E. Lucy & Salem Gharbia, 2022. "Building Climate Resilience in Coastal City Living Labs Using Ecosystem-Based Adaptation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Abi Saad, Elie & Tremblay, Nathalie & Agogué, Marine, 2024. "A multi-level perspective on innovation intermediaries: The case of the diffusion of digital technologies in healthcare," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    7. Osorio, Ferney & Giones, Ferran & Dupont, Laurent & Camargo, Mauricio, 2025. "Innovation labs strategy: unfolding the multifaceted role of strategic intent," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Abi Saad, Elie & Agogué, Marine, 2024. "Living Labs in science-industry collaborations: Roles, design, and application patterns," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Franzò, Simone & Doppio, Nicola & Natalicchio, Angelo & Frattini, Federico & Mion, Luca, 2023. "Designing innovation contests to support external knowledge search in small and medium-sized enterprises," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    10. Sota Makino & Takeshi Onishi & Akika Itoh & Issei Sato & Tomohumi Huzita & Chihiro Kayo, 2021. "Sustainable Campus: Reducing Environmental and Financial Burdens by Using Pruned Branches for On-Campus Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Elias Blanckaert & Louise Hallström & Iris Jennes & Wendy Van den Broeck, 2025. "What Could Possibly Go Wrong? Exploring Challenges and Mitigation Strategies of Applying a Living Lab Approach in an Innovation Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Marina Van Geenhuizen, 2023. "Knowledge Advancing Shopping Mall Living Labs and Customer Value Co-Creation, with a Focus on Social Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Mathilda du Preez & Monique H. Arkesteijn & Alexandra C. den Heijer & Małgorzata Rymarzak, 2022. "Campus Managers’ Role in Innovation Implementation for Sustainability on Dutch University Campuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Mora, Luca & Gerli, Paolo & Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2023. "Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. Grahame Smith & Chloe Dixon & Rafaela Neiva Ganga & Daz Greenop, 2022. "How Do We Know Co-Created Solutions Work Effectively within the Real World of People Living with Dementia? Learning Methodological Lessons from a Co-Creation-to-Evaluation Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-9, November.
    16. Alba Arias & Claudia Pennese & Olatz Grijalba & Yousra Sidqi, 2025. "Application of Living Lab Concept: Where, How and for What Is Being Used in Europe to Support Energy, Social and Environmental Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-25, March.
    17. de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Rigtering, Coen & Spaans, Lara, 2023. "Heroes of diffusion: Making user innovations widely available," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5506-:d:1679285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.