IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14317-d960857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do We Know Co-Created Solutions Work Effectively within the Real World of People Living with Dementia? Learning Methodological Lessons from a Co-Creation-to-Evaluation Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Grahame Smith

    (Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L2 2ER, UK)

  • Chloe Dixon

    (Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L2 2ER, UK)

  • Rafaela Neiva Ganga

    (Faculty of Business and Law, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 5UG, UK)

  • Daz Greenop

    (Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L2 2ER, UK)

Abstract

Living Labs (LL) are a novel and potentially robust way of addressing real-life health challenges, especially within the dementia field. Generally, LLs focus on co-creating through implementing the quadruple helix partnership as a user-centric approach to co-creating. In the context of this paper, the users were people with dementia and their informal carers. LL are not necessarily environments that evaluate these co-created innovations within the real world. Considering this disconnect between co-creation and real-world evaluation, this paper, as a critical commentary, will reflect on the methodological lessons learnt during the development of an LL model aimed at addressing this discrepancy. The LL at Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) was commissioned to co-create and then evaluate a new Dementia Reablement Service. The case study findings revealed that the Dementia Reablement Service had a positive impact on the quality of life of people with dementia, suggesting that the service is a catalyst for positive change. In addition, the critical learning from this case study highlights the potential role of LLs in seamlessly co-creating and then evaluating the co-created solution within the real world. A benefit of this way of working is that it provides opportunities for LLs to secure access to traditional research funding.

Suggested Citation

  • Grahame Smith & Chloe Dixon & Rafaela Neiva Ganga & Daz Greenop, 2022. "How Do We Know Co-Created Solutions Work Effectively within the Real World of People Living with Dementia? Learning Methodological Lessons from a Co-Creation-to-Evaluation Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14317-:d:960857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca G. Logsdon & Kenneth C. Pike & Susan M. McCurry & Patricia Hunter & Joanne Maher & Lisa Snyder & Linda Teri, 2010. "Early-Stage Memory Loss Support Groups: Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 65(6), pages 691-697.
    2. Paskaleva, Krassimira & Cooper, Ian, 2021. "Are living labs effective? Exploring the evidence," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Zheng Liu, 2019. "Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Molinari, Marco & Anund Vogel, Jonas & Rolando, Davide & Lundqvist, Per, 2023. "Using living labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    3. Maruccia, Ylenia & Solazzo, Gianluca & Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Passiante, Giuseppina, 2020. "Evidence from Network Analysis application to Innovation Systems and Quintuple Helix," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Ariful Islam & Sazali Abd Wahab, 2023. "Configuring a Quadruple Helix Innovation Model (QHIM) Based Blueprint for Malaysian SMEs to Survivethe Covid-19 Pandemic," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 13(1), pages 102-127.
    6. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Joana Costa & Inês Amorim & João Reis & Nuno Melão, 2023. "User communities: from nice-to-have to must-have," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, December.
    8. Valentina Della Corte & Giovanna Del Gaudio & Fabiana Sepe & Fabiana Sciarelli, 2019. "Sustainable Tourism in the Open Innovation Realm: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Dell'Era, Claudio & Di Minin, Alberto & Ferrigno, Giulio & Frattini, Federico & Landoni, Paolo & Verganti, Roberto, 2020. "Value capture in open innovation processes with radical circles: A qualitative analysis of firms’ collaborations with Slow Food, Memphis, and Free Software Foundation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Carina Veeckman & Laura Temmerman, 2021. "Urban Living Labs and Citizen Science: From Innovation and Science towards Policy Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Yuki Inoue & Masataka Hashimoto & Takeshi Takenaka, 2019. "Effectiveness of Ecosystem Strategies for the Sustainability of Marketplace Platform Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-33, October.
    12. Obradović, Tena & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina, 2021. "Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Solomon Gyamfi & Yee Yee Sein, 2021. "Determinants of Sustainable Open Innovations—A Firm-Level Capacity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Ananya Tiwari & Luís Campos Rodrigues & Frances E. Lucy & Salem Gharbia, 2022. "Building Climate Resilience in Coastal City Living Labs Using Ecosystem-Based Adaptation: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-29, August.
    15. Roberto Osorno-Hinojosa & Mikko Koria & Delia del Carmen Ramírez-Vázquez & Gabriela Calvario, 2023. "Designing Platforms for Micro and Small Enterprises in Emerging Economies: Sharing Value through Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Mikko Koria & Roberto Osorno-Hinojosa & Delia del Carmen Ramírez-Vázquez & Antonius van den Broek, 2022. "One World, Two Ideas and Three Adaptations: Innovation Intermediaries Enabling Sustainable Open Innovation in University–Industry Collaboration in Finland, Mexico and Nicaragua," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Xintian Wang & Hai Wang, 2019. "A Study on Sustaining Corporate Innovation with E-Commerce in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    18. Sphokazi Phelokazi Mbatha & Josephine Kaviti Musango, 2022. "A Systematic Review on the Application of the Living Lab Concept and Role of Stakeholders in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Jose Alejandro Cano & Abraham Londoño-Pineda & Maria Fanny Castro & Hugo Bécquer Paz & Carolina Rodas & Tatiana Arias, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review on E-Marketplaces, Open Innovation, and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-42, May.
    20. Peter Nijkamp & Karima Kourtit & Henk Scholten & Esmeralda Willemsen, 2023. "Citizen Participation and Knowledge Support in Urban Public Energy Transition—A Quadruple Helix Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14317-:d:960857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.