IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p11937-d921573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Guidelines for the Intellectualization of Human Capital in the Context of Innovative Transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Kuzior

    (Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 26 Roosevelt Str., 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Olena Arefieva

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, National Aviation University, 1, Liubomyra Huzara Ave., 030580 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Alona Kovalchuk

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, National Aviation University, 1, Liubomyra Huzara Ave., 030580 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Paulina Brożek

    (JSofteris, 41-219 Sosnowiec, Poland)

  • Volodymyr Tytykalo

    (Bogomolets National Medical University, 13 Taras Shevchenko Boulevard, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Context and purpose: This study focuses on identifying the current qualities of enhancing the action of intellectualization of human capital. The main purpose of the article is to identify relevant strategic benchmarks for the intellectualization of human capital in enterprises under conditions of innovative transformation. Research method: The methods of research are synthesis and analysis, used to identify trends in the processes of intellectualization of human capital on enterprises, factor analysis methods in combination with methods of expert evaluations, and other general scientific methods. Findings: The article offers, for the first time, a definition of the essence of intellectualization of human capital as a separate economic process, which is based on the renewal of competencies in accordance with the needs of enterprise development and includes the need for their up-to-date globalization and industry trends in the economy of the country. The relationship between the intellectualization of human capital and innovation has been defined. The influence of factors on the processes of intellectualization of human capital on enterprises in conditions of innovative transformations has been investigated. It was found that such factors are prerequisites for the formation of strategic guidelines for the development of the intellectualization of human capital. The main aspects of innovative transformations by identifying trends of intellectualization of Ukrainian human capital in the international space through the analysis of the Global Innovation Index have been investigated. Conclusion and innovation: Thus, the relationship between the intellectualization of human capital and innovation, which affects the sustainability of economic systems, was determined. According to the results of the study, the key directions of formation and development of strategic guidelines for the intellectualization of human capital of enterprises are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Kuzior & Olena Arefieva & Alona Kovalchuk & Paulina Brożek & Volodymyr Tytykalo, 2022. "Strategic Guidelines for the Intellectualization of Human Capital in the Context of Innovative Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11937-:d:921573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11937/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11937/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chapman, B.J. & Pope, D., 1992. "Government, Human Capital Formation and Higher Education," CEPR Discussion Papers 271, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    2. Muhammad Mohiuddin & Elahe Hosseini & Sedigheh Bagheri Faradonbeh & Mehdi Sabokro, 2022. "Achieving Human Resource Management Sustainability in Universities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Emile Cammeraat & Lea Samek & Mariagrazia Squicciarini, 2021. "The role of innovation and human capital for the productivity of industries," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 103, OECD Publishing.
    4. Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu & Elena-Alexandra Gorgos & Alexandru Mihai Ghigiu & Monica Pătruț, 2019. "Bridging Intellectual Capital and SMEs Internationalization through the Lens of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Lenihan, Helena & McGuirk, Helen & Murphy, Kevin R., 2019. "Driving innovation: Public policy and human capital," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    6. Annamaria Di Fabio & José María Peiró, 2018. "Human Capital Sustainability Leadership to Promote Sustainable Development and Healthy Organizations: A New Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Fredrick Betuel Sawe & Anil Kumar & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Rohit Agrawal, 2021. "Assessing people‐driven factors for circular economy practices in small and medium‐sized enterprise supply chains: Business strategies and environmental perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2951-2965, November.
    8. David J. Deming, 2022. "Four Facts about Human Capital," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 75-102, Summer.
    9. Aleksandra Kuzior & Karolina Kettler & Łukasz Rąb, 2021. "Digitalization of Work and Human Resources Processes as a Way to Create a Sustainable and Ethical Organization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Monika Klimontowicz & Justyna Majewska, 2022. "The contribution of intellectual capital to banks' competitive and financial performance: The evidence from Poland," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(2), pages 105-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandra Kuzior & Dariusz Krawczyk & Kateryna Onopriienko & Yuriy Petrushenko & Iryna Onopriienko & Volodymyr Onopriienko, 2023. "Lifelong Learning as a Factor in the Country’s Competitiveness and Innovative Potential within the Framework of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Liubov Syhyda & Liudmyla Saher & Marcin Gąsior & Nataliia Sygyda & Nadiia Artyukhova & Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed & Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi & Robert Rehak, 2023. "Investigating the Role of Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Development in Ukraine and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Aleksandra Kuzior & Katarzyna Anna Postrzednik-Lotko & Brygida Smołka-Franke & Bartosz Sobotka, 2023. "Managing Competences of Generation Y and Z in the Opinion of the Management Staff in the Modern Business Services Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Rojas & Douglas Molina-Orjuela & Laura Peña-Rodríguez & Andrea Hernández-Quirama & Mauricio Rojas-Betancur & Claudia Amaya-Castellanos & Laura A. Rodríguez-Villamizar & Alvaro J. Idrovo, 2023. "Contrary Perceptions of Environmental Health and the Governance of the Bucaramanga Metropolitan Area, Colombia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-13, September.
    2. repec:thr:techub:10014:y:2020:i:1:p:471-482 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Maciej Jagódka & Małgorzata Snarska, 2021. "The State of Human Capital and Innovativeness of Polish Voivodships in 2004–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Md. Shahzalal & Azizul Hassan, 2019. "Communicating Sustainability: Using Community Media to Influence Rural People’s Intention to Adopt Sustainable Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Elena Dinu & Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu & Roxana-Maria Stăneiu & Mihaela Rusu, 2023. "An Exploratory Study Linking Intellectual Capital and Technology Management towards Innovative Performance in KIBS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    8. Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu & Andreea Mitan & Paul Claudiu Cotîrleț & Andreia Gabriela Andrei, 2022. "Exploring the Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing between Informal Business Networks and Organizational Performance: An Insight into SMEs Internationalization in CEE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Hana Urbancová & Pavla Vrabcová, 2023. "Sustainability-oriented Innovation: Crucial Sources to Achieve Competitiveness," Journal of Economics / Ekonomicky casopis, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, vol. 71(1), pages 46-64, January.
    10. Alvaro Guitart Martín & Ricardo J. Palomo Zurdo, 2021. "Digital Inability and Social Sustainability in the Face of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Proposal of New Non-Financial Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Annamaria Di Fabio & Maureen E. Kenny, 2018. "Intrapreneurial Self-Capital: A Key Resource for Promoting Well-Being in a Shifting Work Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-11, August.
    12. Mathushan P & Kengatharan N, 2022. "Human Resource Management Practices And Firm Innovation: Mediating Role Of Human Capital," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 25-36, June.
    13. Daniela Pajardi & Monia Vagni & Viviana La Spada & Serena Cubico, 2020. "International Cooperation in Developing Countries: Reducing Fatalism and Promoting Self-Efficacy to Ensure Sustainable Cooperation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Bratianu Constantin, 2020. "Toward understanding the complexity of the COVID-19 crisis: a grounded theory approach," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 15(s1), pages 410-423, October.
    15. Aleksandra Tokarz & Diana Malinowska, 2019. "From Psychological Theoretical Assumptions to New Research Perspectives in Sustainability and Sustainable Development: Motivation in the Workplace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Mar Ortiz-Gómez & Gabriele Giorgi & Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2020. "Development and Validation of a Spanish Short Servant Leadership Survey (SSLS6-3F) among Spanish Workers in Religious Non-Profit Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Raphaël Martin & Thomas Renault & Baptiste Roux, 2022. "Baisse de la productivité en France : échec en « maths » ?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04084079, HAL.
    18. Annamaria Di Fabio & Marc A. Rosen, 2020. "An Exploratory Study of a New Psychological Instrument for Evaluating Sustainability: The Sustainable Development Goals Psychological Inventory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Annamaria Di Fabio & Donald H. Saklofske, 2019. "Positive Relational Management for Sustainable Development: Beyond Personality Traits—The Contribution of Emotional Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-9, January.
    20. Pervin Ersoy & Gülmüş Börühan & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Jorge Hernandez Hormazabal & Yigit Kazancoglu & Çisem Lafcı, 2022. "Impact of information technology and knowledge sharing on circular food supply chains for green business growth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1875-1904, July.
    21. Mulligan, Kevin & Lenihan, Helena & Doran, Justin & Roper, Stephen, 2022. "Harnessing the science base: Results from a national programme using publicly-funded research centres to reshape firms’ R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11937-:d:921573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.