IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11676-d917376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Features of Geo-Economic Network between China and Countries along the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Hu

    (College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China)

  • Yuejing Ge

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Zhiding Hu

    (Institute for Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)

  • Na Li

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Li Ye

    (Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Ziran Jiang

    (College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China)

  • Yun Deng

    (College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China)

  • Shufang Wang

    (School of Geographic and Environmental Sciences, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China)

  • Yue Shan

    (College of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China)

Abstract

The countries along the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road (MSRCs) are important geo-economic spaces for China. The implementation of the Belt and Road initiative is drawing a new geo-economic network of the Maritime Silk Road. Based on trade and investment flows, this study uses social network analysis to examine the characteristics and structure of trade and investment networks between China and the MSRCs. The results show that the MSRCs’ trade network is approximately an irregular quadrilateral, the node weighted degree distribution follows the law of long-tail distribution, and the trade network has shifted from the tripartite confrontation of China, Japan, and South Korea to China’s single-core dominance. The MSRCs’ trade group has changed greatly, and the trade cohesion of China, Japan, and South Korea is strong. The MSRCs’ investment network is not fully developed and the network connections are sparse. China, Japan, and Singapore are its core nodes. The weight degree of the MSRCs’ investment inflow network first increased and then decreased, and the weight degree of the MSRCs’ investment outflow network increased. The MSRCs’ investment network followed the “core-peripheral” structure. The cohesive subgroup of the investment inflow network did not have significant regional characteristics, and the cohesion of the core subgroups in the MSRCs’ investment outflow network was strong. To promote the development of geo-economic relations between China and the MSRCs, China should focus on regional powers, upgrade the investment network of MSRCs, and implement differentiated geo-economic cooperation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Hu & Yuejing Ge & Zhiding Hu & Na Li & Li Ye & Ziran Jiang & Yun Deng & Shufang Wang & Yue Shan, 2022. "Features of Geo-Economic Network between China and Countries along the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11676-:d:917376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naixia Mou & Caixia Liu & Lingxian Zhang & Xin Fu & Yichun Xie & Yong Li & Peng Peng, 2018. "Spatial Pattern and Regional Relevance Analysis of the Maritime Silk Road Shipping Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Nobi, Ashadun & Lee, Tae Ho & Lee, Jae Woo, 2020. "Structure of trade flow networks for world commodities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 556(C).
    3. Campi, Mercedes & Dueñas, Marco, 2019. "Intellectual property rights, trade agreements, and international trade," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 531-545.
    4. John O'Loughlin & Luc Anselin, 1996. "Geo-Economic Competition and Trade Bloc Formation: United States, German, and Japanese Exports, 1968–1992," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 131-160, April.
    5. Naima Saeed & Kevin Cullinane & Victor Gekara & Prem Chhetri, 2021. "Reconfiguring maritime networks due to the Belt and Road Initiative: impact on bilateral trade flows," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 23(3), pages 381-400, September.
    6. Jiang, Ronghao & Tamang, Tenzin, 2020. "The Evolutionary Dimensions of Global Investment Networks," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 35(4), pages 576-608.
    7. Wei Hu & Yuejing Ge & Qin Dang & Yu Huang & Yuan Hu & Shuai Ye & Shufang Wang, 2020. "Analysis of the Development Level of Geo-Economic Relations between China and Countries along the Belt and Road," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Chan, Jin Hooi & Reiner, David, 2019. "Evolution in inter-firm governance along the transport biofuel value chain in Maritime Silk Road countries," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 268-282.
    9. An, Haizhong & Zhong, Weiqiong & Chen, Yurong & Li, Huajiao & Gao, Xiangyun, 2014. "Features and evolution of international crude oil trade relationships: A trading-based network analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 254-259.
    10. K. Bhattacharya & G. Mukherjee & J. Saramaki & K. Kaski & S. S. Manna, 2007. "The International Trade Network: weighted network analysis and modelling," Papers 0707.4343, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2008.
    11. Xiaobo Su & Kean Fan Lim, 2019. "Opium substitution, reciprocal control and the tensions of geoeconomic integration in the China–Myanmar Border," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(8), pages 1665-1683, November.
    12. Zhaohui Chong & Chenglin Qin & Su Pan, 2019. "The Evolution of the Belt and Road Trade Network and Its Determinant Factors," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 3166-3177, November.
    13. Efstratios Kypriotelis, 2015. "The Institutions Developed In The Eu - Eurasia And The Role Of Balkan Countries – Geopolitical And Geo-Economic Analysis," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 9(1), pages 253-274.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xingxing & Li, Huajiao & Yao, Huajun & Chen, Zhihua & Guan, Qing, 2019. "Network feature and influence factors of global nature graphite trade competition," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 153-161.
    2. Liu, Litao & Cao, Zhi & Liu, Xiaojie & Shi, Lei & Cheng, Shengkui & Liu, Gang, 2020. "Oil security revisited: An assessment based on complex network analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    3. Xiaojin Yuan & Chunbao Ge & Yapan Liu & Na Li & Ying Wang, 2022. "Evolution of Global Crude Oil Trade Network Structure and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Wen-Jie Xie & Na Wei & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2020. "Evolving efficiency and robustness of global oil trade networks," Papers 2004.05325, arXiv.org.
    5. Yujing Wang & Fu Ren & Ruoxin Zhu & Qingyun Du, 2020. "An Exploratory Analysis of Networked and Spatial Characteristics of International Natural Resource Trades (2000–2016)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-34, September.
    6. Mou, Naixia & Wang, Chunying & Yang, Tengfei & Ren, Haonan & Zhang, Lingxian & Xu, Huanqing & Liu, Wenbao, 2022. "Spatiotemporal patterns of maritime trade between China and Maritime Silk Road: Evidence from a quantitative study using social network analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Xie, Wen-Jie & Wei, Na & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2023. "An interpretable machine-learned model for international oil trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    8. Wang, Wenya & Li, Zhenfu & Cheng, Xin, 2019. "Evolution of the global coal trade network: A complex network analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 496-506.
    9. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2023. "The Least developed countries' TRIPS Waiver and the Strength of Intellectual Property Protection," EconStor Preprints 271537, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Gautier M Krings & Jean-François Carpantier & Jean-Charles Delvenne, 2014. "Trade Integration and Trade Imbalances in the European Union: A Network Perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Peixiang Jiang & Chao Ding & Zhiliang Dong & Sen Liu & Yichi Zhang, 2022. "Research on the Trade Characteristics of Conventional Energy Network Countries: Based on the Trade Characteristics of Leading Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Li, Huajiao & An, Haizhong & Liu, Xueyong & Gao, Xiangyun & Fang, Wei & An, Feng, 2016. "Price fluctuation in the energy stock market based on fluctuation and co-fluctuation matrix transmission networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P1), pages 73-83.
    13. Cai, Xiaomei & Liu, Chan & Zheng, Shuxian & Hu, Han & Tan, Zhanglu, 2023. "Analysis on the evolution characteristics of barite international trade pattern based on complex networks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    14. Hao, Xiaoqing & An, Haizhong & Qi, Hai & Gao, Xiangyun, 2016. "Evolution of the exergy flow network embodied in the global fossil energy trade: Based on complex network," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1515-1522.
    15. Niebuhr, Annekatrin & Stiller, Silvia, 2006. "Integration and labour markets in European border regions," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 39(1), pages 57-76.
    16. Florian Blöchl & Fabian J. Theis & Fernando Vega-Redondo & Eric O'N. Fisher, 2010. "Which Sectors of a Modern Economy are most Central?," CESifo Working Paper Series 3175, CESifo.
    17. Sgrignoli, Paolo & Metulini, Rodolfo & Schiavo, Stefano & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2015. "The relation between global migration and trade networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 417(C), pages 245-260.
    18. Massimo Riccaboni & Alessandro Rossi & Stefano Schiavo, 2013. "Global networks of trade and bits," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 8(1), pages 33-56, April.
    19. Katharina Längle, 2020. "Upgrading of Exports: Does the Integration into Trade Agreements Pave the Way to Product Upgrading?," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 20006, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    20. Massimo Riccaboni & Stefano Schiavo, 2009. "The Structure and Growth of International Trade," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2009-24, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11676-:d:917376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.