IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11609-d916135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Escape the Corset”: How a Movement in South Korea Became a Fashion Statement through Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Yeongyo Shin

    (Major in Fashion Design, College of Art & Design, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea)

  • Selee Lee

    (Major in Fashion Design, College of Art & Design, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea)

Abstract

The “escape the corset” movement (ETC-M) is a declaration that actively reflects the voices of Korean women in fourth-wave feminism and spread through social media. This movement emerged as a fashion style against social prejudice and inequality through the lens of feminism and sparked the launch of the “escape the corset” fashion (ETC-F) brand. Feminism, which discusses the conditions of women in our society, is inevitably related to sustainability. It is time to examine the much-neglected social inclusion of sustainable development goals, by examining the declarations that women express through fashion. This study intends to lay down the foundation for in-depth research into ETC-M by understanding the historical background of Korean feminism, the basis of ETC-M. Furthermore, this study aims to analyze ETC-M as a phenomenon that has grown in social media and understand the characteristics and significance of the resulting fashion style. An analysis of the characteristics of ETC-F formed through social media engagement shows that it has developed a range of special items, styles, and looks. ETC-F marked an opportunity to raise awareness about the discriminatory practices in women’s fashion and formed an anti-fashion solidarity among non-mainstream women. In addition to the development of fashion products, ETC-F is leading the development of fashion content that competes with mainstream lifestyle, culture, and entertainment industries. This study offers not only an opportunity to examine the role and meaning of ETC-F from an industrial and cultural perspective, but also implications for the practical consideration of a sustainable society based on inclusion and diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeongyo Shin & Selee Lee, 2022. "“Escape the Corset”: How a Movement in South Korea Became a Fashion Statement through Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11609-:d:916135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11609/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11609/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susie Ruqun WU & Gabriela Shirkey & Ilke Celik & Changliang Shao & Jiquan Chen, 2022. "A Review on the Adoption of AI, BC, and IoT in Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Gang Zhang & Ziang Jia & Shimei Yan, 2022. "Does Gender Matter? The Relationship Comparison of Strategic Leadership on Organizational Ambidextrous Behavior between Male and Female CEOs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Patricia Perkins, 2007. "Feminist Ecological Economics and Sustainability," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 227-244, December.
    4. Vinny Flaviana Hyunanda & José Palacios Ramírez & Gabriel López-Martínez & Víctor Meseguer-Sánchez, 2021. "State Ibuism and Women’s Empowerment in Indonesia: Governmentality and Political Subjectification of Chinese Benteng Women," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samantha Heiberg & Emily Emond & Cody Allen & Dheeraj Raya & Venkataramana Gadhamshetty & Saurabh Sudha Dhiman & Achyuth Ravilla & Ilke Celik, 2023. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Autonomous Transportation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Remig, Moritz C., 2017. "Structured pluralism in ecological economics — A reply to Peter Söderbaum's commentary," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 533-537.
    3. Francesco Rosati & Roberta Costa & Armando Calabrese & Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen, 2018. "Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: a study on gender, age and educational level differences," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1306-1319, November.
    4. Patricia E. Perkins, 2013. "Environmental activism and gender," Chapters, in: Deborah M. Figart & Tonia L. Warnecke (ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life, chapter 31, pages 504-521, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Qilong Cao & Jinglei Li & Hongru Zhang & Yue Liu & Xun Luo, 2022. "Blockchain and Firm Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Peter Söderbaum, 2007. "Towards Sustainability Economics: Principles and Values," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 205-225, December.
    7. Bambang Budi Wiyono & Aan Komariah & Abdulelah A. Alghamdi & Sultoni & Mochammad Fahlevi, 2023. "The Influence of Principals’ e-Leadership on the Effectiveness of Schools’ Public Relations and Organizational Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Sarah-Louise Ruder & Sophia Rose Sanniti, 2019. "Transcending the Learned Ignorance of Predatory Ontologies: A Research Agenda for an Ecofeminist-Informed Ecological Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-29, March.
    9. Hanaček, Ksenija & Roy, Brototi & Avila, Sofia & Kallis, Giorgos, 2020. "Ecological economics and degrowth: Proposing a future research agenda from the margins," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    10. Bauhardt, Christine, 2014. "Solutions to the crisis? The Green New Deal, Degrowth, and the Solidarity Economy: Alternatives to the capitalist growth economy from an ecofeminist economics perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 60-68.
    11. Veuthey, Sandra & Gerber, Julien-François, 2010. "Logging conflicts in Southern Cameroon: A feminist ecological economics perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 170-177, December.
    12. Ghoochani Omid M. & Bakhshi Azadeh & Nejad Azar Hashemi & Ghanian Mansour & Cotton Matthew, 2015. "Environmental values in the petrochemical industry: A Q-method study in South West Iran," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Philippe Holstein, 2014. "The sustainability of colonial and postcolonial island economies : the case of Reunion Island [La soutenabilité des économies insulaires coloniales et postcoloniales : le cas de l’île de La Réunion," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03516478, HAL.
    14. Jens Horbach & Jojo Jacob, 2018. "The relevance of personal characteristics and gender diversity for (eco‐)innovation activities at the firm‐level: Results from a linked employer–employee database in Germany," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 924-934, November.
    15. Seray Ergene & Marta B. Calás & Linda Smircich, 2018. "Ecologies of Sustainable Concerns: Organization Theorizing for the Anthropocene," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 222-245, May.
    16. Faik Bilgili & Masreka Khan & Ashar Awan, 2023. "Is there a gender dimension of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from Asian countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2387-2418, March.
    17. Cristina Cielo & Lisset Coba & Ivette Vallejo, 2016. "Women, nature, and development in sites of Ecuador's petroleum circuit," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(1), pages 119-132, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11609-:d:916135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.