IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p11079-d907217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of Life Subjective Expectations and Exchange from Hosting Mega-Events

Author

Listed:
  • Jangwon Kim

    (Global Destination Marketing Institute, 25 Gangnam-daero 126-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06114, Korea)

  • Jongnye Han

    (Graduate School of Hotel and Tourism Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Eunjeong Kim

    (Graduate School of Hotel and Tourism Management, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Chulwon Kim

    (College of Hotel and Tourism Management, Kyung Hee University, 7-13 Kyungheedae-ro 6-gil, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 06114, Korea)

Abstract

This study examined residents’ quality of life contexts due to the mega-events (F1 Korean Grand Prix 2010 and 2018 Pyeongchang Winter Olympics) based on an insider’s perspective (emic approach). The study investigated the residents’ quality of life contexts due to hosting the mega-events, which are suitable for understanding changes in social patterns among residents. Specifically, the study investigated diverse phenomena surrounding two mega-events and their relation to the quality of life with qualitative methods of participant observation and in-depth interviews. The phenomenon for the quality of life represented socioeconomic effect, educational impact on the local community, infrastructure development, recreational and cultural experience, emotional use of life, community spirit, and direct economic exchange. The subject phenomenon of quality of life examined the Residents’ Perception of Quality of Life, Subjective Expectations and Exchange, and the Relationship Model. The relationship model shows that the mega-event host community residents’ daily life experience from the individual or collective social exchanges influences their perception of the quality of life and the areas of life. Meanwhile, the factors, including individual social interaction, recreational and cultural experience, and the emotional use of life, positively or negatively influence the residents’ perception of the quality of life. Finally, the standards and procedures of the perception of the quality of life appear different depending on the type of residents and whether they have direct economic exchange experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Jangwon Kim & Jongnye Han & Eunjeong Kim & Chulwon Kim, 2022. "Quality of Life Subjective Expectations and Exchange from Hosting Mega-Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11079-:d:907217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11079/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11079/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew K. Rose & Mark M. Spiegel, 2011. "The Olympic Effect," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(553), pages 652-677, June.
    2. Bryan Cheng-Yu Hsu & Yu-Feng Wu & Hsin-Wei Chen & Man-Lai Cheung, 2020. "How Sport Tourism Event Image Fit Enhances Residents’ Perceptions of Place Image and Their Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Biao He & Lianxin Zhu & Xiaomei Cai & Jun (Justin) Li & Hong Zhu, 2020. "Examining the Impacts of Mega-Events on Urban Development Using Coupling Analysis: A Case Study of the Boao Forum for Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Wladimir Andreff & Maike Weitzmann & Holger Preuss, 2019. "Cost and Revenue Overruns of the Olympic Games 2000–2018," Post-Print hal-03231936, HAL.
    5. Jinsu Byun & Becca Leopkey, 2020. "Exploring Issues within Post-Olympic Games Legacy Governance: The Case of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympic Games," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Wladimir Andreff & Maike Weitzmann & Holger Preuss, 2019. "Cost and Revenue Overruns of the Olympic Games 2000–2018," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03231936, HAL.
    7. John Siegfried & Andrew Zimbalist, 2006. "The Economic Impact of Sports Facilities, Teams and Mega-Events," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 39(4), pages 420-427, December.
    8. David Gogishvili & Suzanne Harris-Brandts, 2020. "Coinciding practices of exception in urban development: mega-events and special economic zones in Tbilisi, Georgia," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(10), pages 1999-2019, October.
    9. Jung Woo Lee, 2019. "A winter sport mega-event and its aftermath: A critical review of post-Olympic PyeongChang," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 34(7), pages 745-752, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Laura Mancini & Giulio Papini, 2021. "All that glitters is not gold. An economic evaluation of the Turin Winter Olympics," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1355, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    2. Kathleen Rodenburg & Louise Hayes & Lianne Foti & Ann Pegoraro, 2021. "Responsible Leadership in Sport: An Ethical Dilemma," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Dennis Coates & Brad R. Humphreys, 2008. "Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Subsidies for Sports Franchises, Stadiums, and Mega-Events?," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 5(3), pages 294-315, September.
    4. Pasquale Lucio Scandizzo & Maria Rita Pierleoni, 2018. "Assessing The Olympic Games: The Economic Impact And Beyond," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 649-682, July.
    5. Wong, Kin-Ming & Chong, Terence Tai-Leung, 2016. "Does monetary policy matter for trade?," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 107-125.
    6. Raffaello Bronzini & Sauro Mocetti & Matteo Mongardini, 2020. "The economic effects of big events: Evidence from the great jubilee 2000 in Rome," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 801-822, September.
    7. Gabriel Ahlfeldt & Wolfgang Maennig, 2010. "Impact of sports arenas on land values: evidence from Berlin," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(2), pages 205-227, April.
    8. Faqin Lin & Wenshou Yan & Xiaosong Wang, 2017. "The impact of Africa-China's diplomatic visits on bilateral trade," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 64(3), pages 310-326, July.
    9. Baumann Robert & Engelhardt Bryan & Matheson Victor A., 2012. "Employment Effects of the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, Utah," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 232(3), pages 308-317, June.
    10. Christopher Vierhaus, 2019. "The international tourism effect of hosting the Olympic Games and the FIFA World Cup," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(7), pages 1009-1028, November.
    11. Michał Marcin Kobierecki & Michał Pierzgalski, 2022. "Sports Mega-Events and Economic Growth: A Synthetic Control Approach," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 23(5), pages 567-597, June.
    12. Wolfgang Maennig, 2017. "Major Sports Events: Economic Impact," Working Papers 058, Chair for Economic Policy, University of Hamburg.
    13. Farman Ullah & Yigang Wu & Khalid Mehmood & Fauzia Jabeen & Yaser Iftikhar & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Ho Kwong Kwan, 2021. "Impact of Spectators’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility on Regional Attachment in Sports: Three-Wave Indirect Effects of Spectators’ Pride and Team Identification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Julie Clark & Ade Kearns, 2016. "Going for gold: A prospective assessment of the economic impacts of the Commonwealth Games 2014 on the East End of Glasgow," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(8), pages 1474-1500, December.
    15. Shoag, Daniel & Veuger, Stan, 2017. "Taking My Talents to South Beach (and Back)," Working Paper Series rwp17-019, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    16. M.R. van den Berg & M. de Nooij, 2013. "The bidding paradox: why economists, consultants and politicians disagree on the economic effects of mega sports events but might agree on their attractiveness," Working Papers 13-08, Utrecht School of Economics.
    17. Koning Ruud H. & Maennig Wolfgang, 2012. "Guest Editorial," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 232(3), pages 204-209, June.
    18. Konara, Palitha & Shirodkar, Vikrant, 2018. "Regulatory Institutional Distance and MNCs' Subsidiary Performance: Climbing up Vs. Climbing Down the Institutional Ladder," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 333-347.
    19. Veysel Avsar & Umut Unal, 2014. "Trading Effects of the FIFA World Cup," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 315-329, August.
    20. Allan, Grant J. & Lecca, Patrizio & Swales, Kim, 2017. "The impacts of temporary but anticipated tourism spending: An application to the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 325-337.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    quality of life; mega-event; qualitative research; F1 Grand Prix; Pyeongchang Olympics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11079-:d:907217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.