IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9968-d886326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Labor, Rapport, and Word of Mouth in Fitness Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Hoon Lee

    (Division of Global Sport Industry, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Yongin 17035, Korea)

  • Seunghyun Hwang

    (Department of Leisure Sport, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 37225, Korea)

Abstract

The fitness service industry requires employees to interact with members, placing great importance on their emotional expression to manage service quality and the subsequent organizational outcomes. Emotional labor may be a significant psychologically related factor that plays a critical role in building pleasant interactions between a fitness organization’s employees and its members. Thus, grounded in the emotional contagion theory, this study examines the predictability of perceived emotional labor strategies on the development of a rapport between a fitness organization’s employees and its members, and the subsequent effect of this rapport on word of mouth regarding the fitness organization. A total of 353 fitness members in the United States participated in the modified versions of paper-and-pencil surveys pertaining to the proposed variables. The findings showed that perceived surface acting, or superficial interaction, is negatively related to rapport, whereas perceived deep acting, a more profound form of interaction, is positively related to rapport. Furthermore, rapport was positively associated with word of mouth. This result indicates the significance of emotional labor in the service delivery of fitness employees and developing a positive relationship with fitness members.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Hoon Lee & Seunghyun Hwang, 2022. "Emotional Labor, Rapport, and Word of Mouth in Fitness Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9968-:d:886326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9968/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9968/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Collier, Joel E. & Barnes, Donald C. & Abney, Alexandra K. & Pelletier, Mark J., 2018. "Idiosyncratic service experiences: When customers desire the extraordinary in a service encounter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 150-161.
    2. Khare, Adwait & Labrecque, Lauren I. & Asare, Anthony K., 2011. "The Assimilative and Contrastive Effects of Word-of-Mouth Volume: An Experimental Examination of Online Consumer Ratings," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 111-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maik Hesse & Timm Teubner & Marc T. P. Adam, 2022. "In Stars We Trust – A Note on Reputation Portability Between Digital Platforms," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(3), pages 349-358, June.
    2. Minnema, Alec & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & Gensler, Sonja & Wiesel, Thorsten, 2016. "To Keep or Not to Keep: Effects of Online Customer Reviews on Product Returns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 253-267.
    3. Hsiang-Ming Lee & Tsai Chen & Ya-Hui Hsu & Yu-Chi Wu, 2018. "Effect Of Complementary Product Fit And Brand Awareness On Brand Attitude After M&As: Word Of Mouth As A Moderator," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(1), pages 51-67.
    4. Dalilis Escobar Rivera & Marti Casadesús Fa & Paulo Alexandre Costa Araújo Sampaio & Alexandra Simon Villar, 2019. "Exploring the Role of Service Delivery in Remarkable Tourism Experiences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Wang, Feng & Liu, Xuefeng & Fang, Eric (Er), 2015. "User Reviews Variance, Critic Reviews Variance, and Product Sales: An Exploration of Customer Breadth and Depth Effects," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 372-389.
    6. Yani Wang & Jun Wang & Tang Yao, 2019. "What makes a helpful online review? A meta-analysis of review characteristics," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 257-284, June.
    7. Dominik Gutt & Jürgen Neumann & Steffen Zimmermann & Dennis Kundisch & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Design of Review Systems - A Strategic Instrument to shape Online Review Behavior and Economic Outcomes," Working Papers Dissertations 42, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    8. Morone, Andrea & Nemore, Francesco & Schirone, Dario Antonio, 2018. "Sales impact of servicescape's rational stimuli: A natural experiment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 256-262.
    9. Becky R. Ford & Cynthia Stohl, 2019. "Does CSR Matter? A longitudinal analysis of product reviews for CSR-associated brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(1), pages 60-70, January.
    10. Yingtao Shen & Shenyu Li & Michelle DeMoss, 2012. "The Effect Of Quantitative Electronic Word Of Mouth On Consumer Perceived Product Quality," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(2), pages 19-29.
    11. Krallman, Alexandra & Barnes, Donald C. & Lastner, Matthew M. & Collier, Joel E., 2023. "You can’t touch this: Driving purchase justification for hedonic online purchases," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    12. Agnieszka Zablocki & Bodo Schlegelmilch & Michael J. Houston, 2019. "How valence, volume and variance of online reviews influence brand attitudes," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(1), pages 61-77, June.
    13. Kreuzer, Maria & Cado, Vesna & Raïes, Karine, 2020. "Moments of care: How interpersonal interactions contribute to luxury experiences of healthcare consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 482-490.
    14. Henrik Sällberg & Shujun Wang & Emil Numminen, 2023. "The combinatory role of online ratings and reviews in mobile app downloads: an empirical investigation of gaming and productivity apps from their initial app store launch," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(3), pages 426-442, September.
    15. Abosag, Ibrahim & Baker, Thomas L. & Hall, Kristina Lindsey & Voulgari, Aliki-Dimitra & Zheng, Xiaoyuan, 2017. "Antecedents and consequences of liking in retail service relationships in China and Greece," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 566-578.
    16. Golmohammadi, Alireza & Mattila, Anna S. & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2020. "Negative online reviews and consumers’ service consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 27-36.
    17. Verma, Pranay & Sharma, Anil Kumar, 2018. "Assortment satisfaction: The tale of online footwear sales," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 57-65.
    18. Wu, Yuanyuan & Liu, Tianjiao & Teng, Lefa & Zhang, Hui & Xie, Chenxin, 2021. "The impact of online review variance of new products on consumer adoption intentions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 209-218.
    19. Floyd, Kristopher & Freling, Ryan & Alhoqail, Saad & Cho, Hyun Young & Freling, Traci, 2014. "How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 217-232.
    20. Takumi Kato, 2022. "Rating valence versus rating distribution: perceived helpfulness of word of mouth in e-commerce," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-24, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9968-:d:886326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.