IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10059-d887931.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mass-Customization-Based Remanufacturing Scheme Design Method for Used Products

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhou

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hubei Polytechnic University, Huangshi 435003, China)

  • Chao Ke

    (School of Automotive Technology and Services, Wuhan City Polytechnic, Wuhan 430070, China
    Hubei Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission and Manufacturing Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China)

Abstract

Remanufacturing scheme design (RSD) is an essential step in the restoration and upgrading of used products. However, the quantity of remanufactured products is growing rapidly, and customers have personalized demands for remanufactured products that lead to shorter design cycles. In addition, the used products are scrapped due to their own defects, such as performance failure and functional degradation, which correspond to the inherent remanufacturing demand (IRD) of used products. Faced with large quantities of used products, how to quickly develop reasonable remanufacturing schemes for satisfying customers’ individual demands and the IRD is an urgent problem to be solved. To address these issues, a mass customization-based RSD method is proposed. First, remanufacturing demand comprising customer demand and the IRD is analyzed to determine the RSD targets and remanufacturing types. Then, the RSD methods are intelligently selected based on the remanufacturing types, which include restorative remanufacturing, upgrade remanufacturing and hybrid remanufacturing, while the hybrid contains restorative remanufacturing and upgrade remanufacturing. Moreover, the restorative remanufacturing scheme is generated to satisfy the restorative remanufacturing targets based on reverse engineering (RE) and the tool contact point path section line (TCPPSL) method. After used products are restored, case-based reasoning (CBR) is used to retrieve the case that best matches the upgrade remanufacturing targets, while the grey relational analysis (GRA) algorithm is applied to calculate the similarity between cases. Finally, the feasibility of this method is verified by considering the RSD of a used lathe. The results indicated that the proposed approach can rapidly help designers to obtain remanufacturing solutions for satisfying the customer demand and IRD.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhou & Chao Ke, 2022. "A Mass-Customization-Based Remanufacturing Scheme Design Method for Used Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10059-:d:887931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shwetank Avikal & Rohit Singh & Rashmi Rashmi, 2020. "QFD and Fuzzy Kano model based approach for classification of aesthetic attributes of SUV car profile," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 271-284, February.
    2. Sonu Rajak & P. Parthiban & R. Dhanalakshmi, 2018. "Selection of Transportation Channels in Closed-Loop Supply Chain Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithm," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 11(3), pages 64-86, July.
    3. Sahand Somi & Nima Gerami Seresht & Aminah Robinson Fayek, 2020. "Framework for Risk Identification of Renewable Energy Projects Using Fuzzy Case-Based Reasoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Zhigang Jiang & Ya Jiang & Yan Wang & Hua Zhang & Huajun Cao & Guangdong Tian, 2019. "A hybrid approach of rough set and case-based reasoning to remanufacturing process planning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 19-32, January.
    5. Da Silveira, Giovani & Borenstein, Denis & Fogliatto, Flavio S., 2001. "Mass customization: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Zhang, Min & Guo, Hangfei & Huo, Baofeng & Zhao, Xiande & Huang, Jianbo, 2019. "Linking supply chain quality integration with mass customization and product modularity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 227-235.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Ramirez, Germán Contreras & Campbell, Jeffrey & Klaus, Philipp, 2021. "The product is me: Hyper-personalized consumer goods as unconventional luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 446-454.
    2. Rönnberg Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Capability configurations for advanced service offerings in manufacturing firms: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5330-5335.
    3. Laurent Lim, Lâm & Alpan, Gülgün & Penz, Bernard, 2014. "Reconciling sales and operations management with distant suppliers in the automotive industry: A simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 20-36.
    4. Zhou, Wei & Piramuthu, Selwyn, 2012. "Manufacturing with item-level RFID information: From macro to micro quality control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 929-938.
    5. Natalia Szozda & Artur Świerczek, 2022. "Upstream and downstream dyad governance within the network structures: Creating supply chain governance for the customized products," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 873-898, June.
    6. Lyons, Andrew Charles & Um, Juneho & Sharifi, Hossein, 2020. "Product variety, customisation and business process performance: A mixed-methods approach to understanding their relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Bruno César Araújo & Rodrigo Abdalla Filgueiras de Sousa, 2015. "Market Leadership in Brazil´s ICT Sector: The Cases of Totvs And Positivo," Discussion Papers 0197, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
    8. Rui Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Shisheng Zhong & Gaolei Peng & Lin Wang, 2022. "Decision rule mining for machining method chains based on rough set theory," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 799-807, March.
    9. Teerling, M.L. & Huizingh, Eelko K.R.E., 2006. "Exploring the concept of web site customization: applications and antecedents," Research Report 06F07, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. Na Liu & Pui-Sze Chow & Hongshan Zhao, 2020. "Challenges and critical successful factors for apparel mass customization operations: recent development and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 531-563, August.
    11. Minvielle, Etienne & Waelli, Mathias & Sicotte, Claude & Kimberly, John R., 2014. "Managing customization in health care: A framework derived from the services sector literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 216-227.
    12. Sandrin, Enrico & Trentin, Alessio & Forza, Cipriano, 2018. "Leveraging high-involvement practices to develop mass customization capability: A contingent configurational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 335-345.
    13. Wenkang Zhang & Yufan Zheng & Rafiq Ahmad, 2023. "The integrated process planning and scheduling of flexible job-shop-type remanufacturing systems using improved artificial bee colony algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2963-2988, October.
    14. Gedas Baranauskas & Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Renata Korsakienė, 2020. "Mapping the Scientific Research on Mass Customization Domain: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Süleyman BARUTCU, 2007. "Customized Products: The Integrating Relationship Marketing, Agile Manufacturing And Supply Chain Management For Mass Customization," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 573-593.
    16. Trentin, Alessio & Perin, Elisa & Forza, Cipriano, 2012. "Product configurator impact on product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 850-859.
    17. Dirk Briskorn & Konrad Stephan & Nils Boysen, 2022. "Minimizing the makespan on a single machine subject to modular setups," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 125-137, February.
    18. Wang, Shuai & Ma, Shuang, 2023. "Is product customization always beneficial in the context of C2M platforms? A signaling theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    19. Brian Squire & Steve Brown & Jeff Readman & John Bessant, 2006. "The Impact of Mass Customisation on Manufacturing Trade‐offs," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 15(1), pages 10-21, March.
    20. Bogers, Marcel & Hadar, Ronen & Bilberg, Arne, 2016. "Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: Implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 225-239.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10059-:d:887931. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.