IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9521-d879369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Attitudes as Part of Lifestyle in the COVID-19 Emergency

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Badora

    (Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 15 Akademicka Street, 20-950 Lublin, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Kud

    (The Faculty of Management, Department of Enterprise, Management and Eco-Innovation, Rzeszow University of Technology, 12 Powstańców Warszawy Street, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Marian Woźniak

    (The Faculty of Management, Department of Economics, Rzeszow University of Technology, 12 Powstańców Warszawy Street, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

Abstract

The pandemic brought significant changes to the functioning of society. This article examines the opinion of consumers in south-eastern Poland on lifestyle elements such as shopping preferences, physical activity, holiday preferences and others, against the background of the COVID-19 situation. The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between selected components included in the lifestyle of society in the context of the COVID-19 emergency situation. The research was conducted from 9 November 2020 to 17 January 2021. In order to identify the respondents’ attitudes and their perception of the issues discussed in this study, a questionnaire was created containing a number of theses formulations assessed by the respondents in terms of compliance with their beliefs. The evaluation was carried out using a seven-point bipolar Likert scale with a neutral value. The study was not probabilistic, therefore the inference applies only to the studied group. A total of 737 questionnaires meeting the research assumptions were collected. The form was used to identify ecological attitudes, shopping behavior, food preferences, physical activity and tourist preferences in the COVID-19 situation in which the research was conducted. Also identified were holiday destinations in 2019 and 2020, preferred diet type, and socio-demographic background: sex, age, place of residence and approximate per capita income. The research revealed that the purchasing behavior of the respondents was a predictor of their physical activity and tourist preferences. Studies have also shown that the food preferences of the respondents are an important part of their balanced lifestyle and depend on the sex of the person. The respondents preferred an active lifestyle as a form of pro-health activity when living in the situation of COVID-19. During the COVID-19 pandemic, respondents’ interest in domestic tourism also increased.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Badora & Krzysztof Kud & Marian Woźniak, 2022. "Consumer Attitudes as Part of Lifestyle in the COVID-19 Emergency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9521-:d:879369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9521/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9521/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziyuan Liu & Tianle Liu & Xingdong Liu & Aijing Wei & Xiaoxue Wang & Ying Yin & You Li, 2021. "Research on Optimization of Healthcare Waste Management System Based on Green Governance Principle in the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Theo Gavrielides, 2022. "Ambitions and Critiques of Restorative Justice Post COVID-19," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-3, January.
    3. Philip M. Gleason & Carol J. Boushey & Jeffrey E. Harris & Jamie Zoellner, 2015. "Publishing Nutrition Research: A Review of Multivariate Techniques—Part 3: Data Reduction Methods," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0da0dac5d0b141369caf21f23, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Annie Drottberger & Martin Melin & Lotten Lundgren, 2021. "Alternative Food Networks in Food System Transition—Values, Motivation, and Capacity Building among Young Swedish Market Gardeners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Gwijeong Park & Fangxin Chen & Le Cheng, 2021. "A Study on the Millennials Usage Behavior of Social Network Services: Effects of Motivation, Density, and Centrality on Continuous Intention to Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Lauren A. Clay & Mia A. Papas & Kimberly B. Gill & David M. Abramson, 2018. "Factors Associated with Continued Food Insecurity among Households Recovering from Hurricane Katrina," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-10, August.
    7. Xinxin Zhang & Wenfei Zhu & Sifan Kang & Longkun Qiu & Zijun Lu & Yuliang Sun, 2020. "Association between Physical Activity and Mood States of Children and Adolescents in Social Isolation during the COVID-19 Epidemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-12, October.
    8. Xiang, Zheng & Magnini, Vincent P. & Fesenmaier, Daniel R., 2015. "Information technology and consumer behavior in travel and tourism: Insights from travel planning using the internet," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 244-249.
    9. Nathanaël Randriamihamison & Nathalie Vialaneix & Pierre Neuvial, 2021. "Applicability and Interpretability of Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering With or Without Contiguity Constraints," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(2), pages 363-389, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    2. Liu, Chih-Hsing & Dong, Tse-Ping & Vu, Ho Tran, 2023. "Transformed virtual concepts into reality: Linkage the viewpoint of entrepreneurial passion, technology adoption propensity and advantage to usage intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Shiwei Shen & Marios Sotiriadis & Qing Zhou, 2020. "Could Smart Tourists Be Sustainable and Responsible as Well? The Contribution of Social Networking Sites to Improving Their Sustainable and Responsible Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Yoo, Chul Woo & Goo, Jahyun & Huang, C. Derrick & Nam, Kichan & Woo, Mina, 2017. "Improving travel decision support satisfaction with smart tourism technologies: A framework of tourist elaboration likelihood and self-efficacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 330-341.
    5. Alexandria J. Drake & Lora A. Phillips & Brajesh Karna & Shakthi Bharathi Murugesan & Lily K. Villa & Nathan A. Smith, 2023. "Food insecurity and disasters: predicting disparities in total and first-time food pantry visits during the COVID-19 pandemic," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 493-504, April.
    6. Mazanec, Josef A., 2020. "Hidden theorizing in big data analytics: With a reference to tourism design research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Angel Stoykov, 2023. "The Influence Of Social Media On Advertising Tourism Services (In The Example Of Bulgaria)," Business Management, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 1 Year 20, pages 64-80.
    8. Farzana Sharmin & Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Alina Badulescu & Dorin Paul Bac & Benqian Li, 2020. "Millennial Tourists’ Environmentally Sustainable Behavior Towards a Natural Protected Area: An Integrative Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Jelena Petrović & Snežana Milićević & Lukrecija Djeri, 2017. "The information and communications technology as a factor of destination competitiveness in transition countries in European Union," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(6), pages 1353-1361, September.
    10. Alex Yang-chan Hsu & Brian King & Dan Wang & Dimitrios Buhalis, 2016. "In-destination tour products and the disrupted tourism industry: progress and prospects," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 413-433, December.
    11. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    12. Veronica Cruz-Licea & Isabel Cristina Moran Alvarez & Carmen Plascencia Gonzalez & Vanesa Gongora, 2020. "Obesity prevention messages, risk behaviors for eating disorders and body mass index. Cluster analysis," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 8(1), pages 685-693, June.
    13. Norbert Haydam & Theodor Purcarea & Tudor Edu & Iliuta Costel Negricea, 2017. "Explaining Satisfaction at a Foreign Tourism Destination – an Intra-Generational Approach. Evidence within Generation Y from South Africa and Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 528-528, May.
    14. Suzanne Amaro & Paulo Duarte, 2017. "Social media use for travel purposes: a cross cultural comparison between Portugal and the UK," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 161-181, June.
    15. Aureliusz Kosendiak & Magdalena Król & Milena Ściskalska & Marta Kepinska, 2021. "The Changes in Stress Coping, Alcohol Use, Cigarette Smoking and Physical Activity during COVID-19 Related Lockdown in Medical Students in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. A Fronzetti Colladon & B Guardabascio & R Innarella, 2021. "Using social network and semantic analysis to analyze online travel forums and forecast tourism demand," Papers 2105.07727, arXiv.org.
    17. Mohammed Jabreel & Assumpció Huertas & Antonio Moreno, 2018. "Semantic analysis and the evolution towards participative branding: Do locals communicate the same destination brand values as DMOs?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, November.
    18. Kevin M. Fitzpatrick & Don E. Willis & Matthew L. Spialek & Emily English, 2020. "Food Insecurity in the Post-Hurricane Harvey Setting: Risks and Resources in the Midst of Uncertainty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Mateusz Naramski, 2020. "The Application of ICT and Smart Technologies in Polish Museums—Towards Smart Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-27, November.
    20. Vinaitheerthan Renganathan & Amitabh Upadhya, 2021. "Dubai Restaurants: A Sentiment Analysis of Tourist Reviews," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 14(2), pages 165-174.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9521-:d:879369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.