IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8821-d866207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Evaluation Model on Optimal Operational Schedules for Battery Energy Storage System by Maximizing Self-Consumption Strategy and Genetic Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Yazhou Zhao

    (Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Xiangxi Qin

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
    Lily Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311228, China)

  • Xiangyu Shi

    (College of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Building an energy storage system is beneficial when solar panels are not producing sufficient energy. However, there is a major issue in terms of feasibility and efficiency. These limitations could be overcome by the deployment of optimal operational strategies. In previous studies, researchers typically focused on finding problem-solving strategies in such situations with only one or two evaluation indicators, lacking a comprehensive evaluation of the integrated objective. Moreover, few studies propose a general model of battery systems suitable for forecast-based operation scenarios with different energy demand features. Therefore, this study developed a comprehensive evaluation model for the operational schedule optimization of a battery energy storage system with a detailed and holistic analysis as well as practicality in implementation. In order to consume the maximum allowable rate of PV generation as promptly and completely as possible, this model was based on a maximizing self-consumption strategy (MSC). A genetic algorithm was applied to time match PV generation and load demand with full consideration of comprehensive techno-economic indicators and total operation cost as well. The model was validated within a typical American house to select the best battery system according to techno-economic indicators for the three types of batteries analyzed. It was discovered that the three types of batteries including Discover AES, Electriq PowerPod2 and Tesla Powerwall+ could all be considered as options for energy storage, and there exist subtle differences in their technical performance during the short charging and discharging phases. Discover AES has the advantage of using PV generation in a timely manner to suit load demand during the long-term operation of a battery energy storage system. With the proper prediction of building energy demand by means of a machine learning approach, the model’s robustness and predictive performance could be further extended. The machine learning approach proved feasible for adapting our optimization model to various battery storage scenarios with different energy demand features. This study is novel in two ways. Firstly, hierarchical optimization was conducted with a genetic algorithm using the MSC strategy. Secondly, the machine learning approach was applied in conjunction with the genetic algorithm to perform online optimization for the predictive schedule. Additionally, three main advantages of the methodology proposed in this paper for producing an optimal operational schedule were identified, which are as follows: generic applicability, convenient implementation and good scalability. However, the charging and discharging performance of the battery energy storage system was simulated under short-term operation with regular solar radiation. Long-term operation considering solar fluctuation should be investigated in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yazhou Zhao & Xiangxi Qin & Xiangyu Shi, 2022. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Model on Optimal Operational Schedules for Battery Energy Storage System by Maximizing Self-Consumption Strategy and Genetic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-34, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8821-:d:866207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8821/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8821/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Faizan A. & Pal, Nitai & Saeed, Syed.H., 2018. "Review of solar photovoltaic and wind hybrid energy systems for sizing strategies optimization techniques and cost analysis methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 937-947.
    2. Schram, Wouter L. & Lampropoulos, Ioannis & van Sark, Wilfried G.J.H.M., 2018. "Photovoltaic systems coupled with batteries that are optimally sized for household self-consumption: Assessment of peak shaving potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 69-81.
    3. Angenendt, Georg & Zurmühlen, Sebastian & Axelsen, Hendrik & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2018. "Comparison of different operation strategies for PV battery home storage systems including forecast-based operation strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 884-899.
    4. Hussein, Ala A. & Fardoun, Abbas A., 2015. "Design considerations and performance evaluation of outdoor PV battery chargers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 85-91.
    5. Zhang, Yijie & Ma, Tao & Elia Campana, Pietro & Yamaguchi, Yohei & Dai, Yanjun, 2020. "A techno-economic sizing method for grid-connected household photovoltaic battery systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Nyholm, Emil & Goop, Joel & Odenberger, Mikael & Johnsson, Filip, 2016. "Solar photovoltaic-battery systems in Swedish households – Self-consumption and self-sufficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 148-159.
    7. Hernández, J.C. & Sanchez-Sutil, F. & Muñoz-Rodríguez, F.J., 2019. "Design criteria for the optimal sizing of a hybrid energy storage system in PV household-prosumers to maximize self-consumption and self-sufficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Zou, Bin & Peng, Jinqing & Li, Sihui & Li, Yi & Yan, Jinyue & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "Comparative study of the dynamic programming-based and rule-based operation strategies for grid-connected PV-battery systems of office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    9. Cai, Jie & Zhang, Hao & Jin, Xing, 2019. "Aging-aware predictive control of PV-battery assets in buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 478-488.
    10. Sharma, Vanika & Haque, Mohammed H. & Aziz, Syed Mahfuzul, 2019. "Energy cost minimization for net zero energy homes through optimal sizing of battery storage system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 278-286.
    11. Luthander, Rasmus & Widén, Joakim & Nilsson, Daniel & Palm, Jenny, 2015. "Photovoltaic self-consumption in buildings: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 80-94.
    12. Verma, Deepak & Nema, Savita & Shandilya, A.M. & Dash, Soubhagya K., 2016. "Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques: Recapitulation in solar photovoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1018-1034.
    13. Abdmouleh, Zeineb & Gastli, Adel & Ben-Brahim, Lazhar & Haouari, Mohamed & Al-Emadi, Nasser Ahmed, 2017. "Review of optimization techniques applied for the integration of distributed generation from renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 266-280.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuesong Tian & Yuping Zou & Xin Wang & Minglang Tseng & Hua Li & Huijuan Zhang, 2022. "Improving the Efficiency and Sustainability of Intelligent Electricity Inspection: IMFO-ELM Algorithm for Load Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Gülsah Erdogan & Wiem Fekih Hassen, 2023. "Charging Scheduling of Hybrid Energy Storage Systems for EV Charging Stations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-29, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zou, Bin & Peng, Jinqing & Li, Sihui & Li, Yi & Yan, Jinyue & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "Comparative study of the dynamic programming-based and rule-based operation strategies for grid-connected PV-battery systems of office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Zhang, Yijie & Ma, Tao & Yang, Hongxing, 2022. "Grid-connected photovoltaic battery systems: A comprehensive review and perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    3. Ma, Tao & Zhang, Yijie & Gu, Wenbo & Xiao, Gang & Yang, Hongxing & Wang, Shuxiao, 2022. "Strategy comparison and techno-economic evaluation of a grid-connected photovoltaic-battery system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1049-1060.
    4. Muñoz-Rodríguez, Francisco José & Jiménez-Castillo, Gabino & de la Casa Hernández, Jesús & Aguilar Peña, Juan Domingo, 2021. "A new tool to analysing photovoltaic self-consumption systems with batteries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1327-1343.
    5. Parra, David & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "The nature of combining energy storage applications for residential battery technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1343-1355.
    6. Liu, Jia & Chen, Xi & Yang, Hongxing & Li, Yutong, 2020. "Energy storage and management system design optimization for a photovoltaic integrated low-energy building," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Zhou, Xinlei & Xue, Shan & Du, Han & Ma, Zhenjun, 2023. "Optimization of building demand flexibility using reinforcement learning and rule-based expert systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    8. Nina Munzke & Felix Büchle & Anna Smith & Marc Hiller, 2021. "Influence of Efficiency, Aging and Charging Strategy on the Economic Viability and Dimensioning of Photovoltaic Home Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-46, November.
    9. Reimuth, Andrea & Prasch, Monika & Locherer, Veronika & Danner, Martin & Mauser, Wolfram, 2019. "Influence of different battery charging strategies on residual grid power flows and self-consumption rates at regional scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 572-581.
    10. Roberts, Mike B. & Bruce, Anna & MacGill, Iain, 2019. "Impact of shared battery energy storage systems on photovoltaic self-consumption and electricity bills in apartment buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C), pages 78-95.
    11. Ollas, Patrik & Sigarchian, Sara Ghaem & Alfredsson, Hampus & Leijon, Jennifer & Döhler, Jessica Santos & Aalhuizen, Christoffer & Thiringer, Torbjörn & Thomas, Karin, 2023. "Evaluating the role of solar photovoltaic and battery storage in supporting electric aviation and vehicle infrastructure at Visby Airport," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    12. Sofiane Kichou & Nikolaos Skandalos & Petr Wolf, 2020. "Evaluation of Photovoltaic and Battery Storage Effects on the Load Matching Indicators Based on Real Monitored Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    13. Reza Fachrizal & Joakim Munkhammar, 2020. "Improved Photovoltaic Self-Consumption in Residential Buildings with Distributed and Centralized Smart Charging of Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Zhou, Hou Sheng & Passey, Rob & Bruce, Anna & Sproul, Alistair B., 2021. "A case study on the behaviour of residential battery energy storage systems during network demand peaks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 712-724.
    15. Mulleriyawage, U.G.K. & Shen, W.X., 2021. "Impact of demand side management on optimal sizing of residential battery energy storage system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1250-1266.
    16. Luthander, Rasmus & Nilsson, Annica M. & Widén, Joakim & Åberg, Magnus, 2019. "Graphical analysis of photovoltaic generation and load matching in buildings: A novel way of studying self-consumption and self-sufficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 748-759.
    17. Schopfer, S. & Tiefenbeck, V. & Staake, T., 2018. "Economic assessment of photovoltaic battery systems based on household load profiles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 229-248.
    18. Freitas Gomes, Icaro Silvestre & Perez, Yannick & Suomalainen, Emilia, 2020. "Coupling small batteries and PV generation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    19. Collath, Nils & Cornejo, Martin & Engwerth, Veronika & Hesse, Holger & Jossen, Andreas, 2023. "Increasing the lifetime profitability of battery energy storage systems through aging aware operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    20. Sun, Xiaoqin & Lin, Yian & Zhu, Ziyang & Li, Jie, 2022. "Optimized design of a distributed photovoltaic system in a building with phase change materials," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8821-:d:866207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.