IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8675-d863542.html

Evaluation of Agricultural Machinery Using Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Adis Puška

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Bijeljina University, Pavlovića put bb, 76300 Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Miroslav Nedeljković

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, Volgina 15, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Živče Šarkoćević

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Pristina, Knjaza Milosa 7, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia)

  • Zoran Golubović

    (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Pristina, Knjaza Milosa 7, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia)

  • Vladica Ristić

    (Faculty of Applied Ecology (FUTURA), University Metropolitan, Požeška 83a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Ilija Stojanović

    (College of Business Administration, American University in the Emirates, Dubai International Academic City, Dubai P.O. Box 503000, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

To achieve the highest possible agricultural production, it is necessary to procure the appropriate agricultural machinery. A tractor is the most useful machine in agriculture that performs various functions. Therefore, the selection of a tractor is one of the key decisions in the agriculture-production process. This study aims to evaluate heavy tractors for agricultural production in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Since this is a selection between different tractors, which are evaluated using several criteria, the methods of multi-criteria analysis (MCDA) were used in this study. Five different methods were used to determine the weight of the criteria, of which a modified standard-deviation method is a new method used in practice, while the tractor ranking was performed using the CRADIS (compromise ranking of alternatives from distance to ideal solution) method. The results showed that the best-ranked tractor is A4, while the most deviations from the ranking occur when the entropy method is used. The contribution of this study is in the systematization of the methods for the objective determination of the criteria weights and the development of new methods to facilitate decision-making in agriculture and other industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Adis Puška & Miroslav Nedeljković & Živče Šarkoćević & Zoran Golubović & Vladica Ristić & Ilija Stojanović, 2022. "Evaluation of Agricultural Machinery Using Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8675-:d:863542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8675/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8675/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Afsaneh Kaghazchi & Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany & Alireza Firoozfar, 2022. "Prioritization of agricultural water distribution operating systems based on the sustainable development indicators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 23-40, February.
    2. Seung-Min Baek & Seung-Yun Baek & Hyeon-Ho Jeon & Wan-Soo Kim & Yeon-Soo Kim & Nam-Hyeok Kim & Taeyong Sim & Hyunggun Kim & Yong-Joo Kim, 2022. "Improvement of Gear Durability for an 86 kW Class Agricultural Tractor Transmission by Material Selection," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. N Deepa & K Ganesan & Kathiravan Srinivasan & Chuan-Yu Chang, 2019. "Realizing Sustainable Development via Modified Integrated Weighting MCDM Model for Ranking Agrarian Dataset," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Anderson Hoose & Víctor Yepes & Moacir Kripka, 2021. "Selection of Production Mix in the Agricultural Machinery Industry Considering Sustainability in Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Michał Cupiał & Zbigniew Kowalczyk, 2020. "Optimization of Selection of the Machinery Park in Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Hadi Lalghorbani & Ali Jahan, 2022. "Selection of a Wheat Harvester according to Qualitative and Quantitative Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Luis Ruiz-Garcia & Patricia Sanchez-Guerrero, 2022. "A Decision Support Tool for Buying Farm Tractors, Based on Predictive Analytics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Moinfar, AbdolMajid & Shahgholi, Gholamhossein & Gilandeh, Yousef Abbaspour & Gundoshmian, Tarahom Mesri, 2020. "The effect of the tractor driving system on its performance and fuel consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Adis Puška & Miroslav Nedeljković & Radivoj Prodanović & Radovan Vladisavljević & Radmila Suzić, 2022. "Market Assessment of Pear Varieties in Serbia Using Fuzzy CRADIS and CRITIC Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Maria Rosaria Guarini & Fabrizio Battisti & Anthea Chiovitti, 2018. "A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-28, February.
    11. Han, Jialin & Hu, Yaoguang & Mao, Mingsong & Wan, Shuping, 2020. "A multi-objective districting problem applied to agricultural machinery maintenance service network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1120-1130.
    12. Yingyu Zhu & Yan Zhang & Huilan Piao, 2022. "Does Agricultural Mechanization Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of China’s Planting Industry?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nazlı Ersoy & Nuh Keleş, 2024. "Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods with the same normalization procedure based on real-life applications," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 34(3), pages 87-100.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jian Sun & Yiming Zhang & Haitao Chen & Jinyou Qiao, 2023. "Optimization Model and Application for Agricultural Machinery Systems Based on Timeliness Losses of Multiple Operations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Akpan, Uduak & Morimoto, Risako, 2022. "An application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to the prioritization of rural roads to improve rural accessibility in Nigeria," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    3. Rana Shahzad Noor & Fiaz Hussain & Muhammad Umair & Muhammad Umar Farooq & Abu Saad & Yong Sun, 2020. "Silage Corn Production Under Different Planting Methods In Rainfed Agriculture System: An Energy Analysis," Big Data In Agriculture (BDA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 32-35:2, August.
    4. Zhenhao Luo & Jihang Wang & Jing Wu & Shengli Zhang & Zhongju Chen & Bin Xie, 2023. "Research on a Hydraulic Cylinder Pressure Control Method for Efficient Traction Operation in Electro-Hydraulic Hitch System of Electric Tractors," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    6. Amogh Gyaneshwar & Anirudh Mishra & Utkarsh Chadha & P. M. Durai Raj Vincent & Venkatesan Rajinikanth & Ganapathy Pattukandan Ganapathy & Kathiravan Srinivasan, 2023. "A Contemporary Review on Deep Learning Models for Drought Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, April.
    7. Cunjing Liu & Lei Chen & Zhezhou Li & Difan Wu, 2023. "The impact of digital financial inclusion and urbanization on agricultural mechanization: Evidence from counties of China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Mahmut Baydaş & Dragan Pamučar, 2022. "Determining Objective Characteristics of MCDM Methods under Uncertainty: An Exploration Study with Financial Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Zhang, Junjiang & Shi, Mingyue & Liu, Mengnan & Wang, Dongqing & Yan, Xianghai & Xu, Liyou & Wu, Yiwei, 2025. "Design method of dual-motor electric tractor drive system based on mass constraint algorithm under uncertainty using mass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    10. Punys, P. & Radzevičius, A. & Kvaraciejus, A. & Gasiūnas, V. & Šilinis, L., 2019. "A multi-criteria analysis for siting surface-flow constructed wetlands in tile-drained agricultural catchments: The case of Lithuania," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1036-1046.
    11. Beriro, Darren & Nathanail, Judith & Salazar, Juan & Kingdon, Andrew & Marchant, Andrew & Richardson, Steve & Gillet, Andy & Rautenberg, Svea & Hammond, Ellis & Beardmore, John & Moore, Terry & Angus,, 2022. "A decision support system to assess the feasibility of onshore renewable energy infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Ai-bing Ji & Bo-wen Wei & Yi-yi Ma, 2024. "Incremental Data Envelopment Analysis Model and Applications in Sustainable Efficiency Evaluation," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 461-486, July.
    13. Jorge Antunes & Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh & Ali Jamshidi & Yong Tan & Peter Wanke, 2024. "Efficiency of Low-Carbon Finance: Its Interrelationships with Industry and Macroeconomic Environment," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15328-15364, September.
    14. Jarosław Brodny & Magdalena Tutak & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2025. "A Holistic Assessment of Sustainable Energy Security and the Efficiency of Policy Implementation in Emerging EU Economies: A Long-Term Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-38, April.
    15. Junjiang Zhang & Bin Zhao & Xianghai Yan & Mengnan Liu & Liyou Xu & Chengyan Shang, 2023. "Design and optimization of dual-motor electric tractor drive system based on driving cycles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, June.
    16. R. Krishankumar & P. P. Amritha & K. S. Ravichandran, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: An integrated fuzzy decision model for prioritization of barriers affecting sustainability adoption within supply chains under unknown weight context," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1010-1027, December.
    17. Hua Guo & Fan Gu & Yanling Peng & Xin Deng & Lili Guo, 2022. "Does Digital Inclusive Finance Effectively Promote Agricultural Green Development?—A Case Study of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Aytekin, Ahmet & Korucuk, Selçuk & Görçün, Ömer Faruk, 2024. "Determining the factors affecting transportation demand management and selecting the best strategy: A case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 150-166.
    19. Cinelli, Marco & Kadziński, Miłosz & Gonzalez, Michael & Słowiński, Roman, 2020. "How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Giuseppe Timpanaro, 2023. "Agricultural Food Marketing, Economics and Policies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-9, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8675-:d:863542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.