IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p8089-d854179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Competency Assessment of Educational Innovation in Upper Secondary School and Higher Education: A Mapping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Krstikj

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Architecture, Art and Design, López Mateos 52926, Mexico)

  • Juan Sosa Godina

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Business School, Mexico City 01389, Mexico)

  • Luciano García Bañuelos

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Science, Puebla 72453, Mexico)

  • Omar Israel González Peña

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Science, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
    Tecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for the Future of Education, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
    Evidence-Based Medicine Research Unit, Children’s Hospital of Mexico Federico Gómez, National Institute of Health, Dr. Márquez 162, Col. Doctores, Del. Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
    National Institute of Sciences and Innovation for the Formation of the Scientific Community, INDEHUS, Anillo Periférico 4860, Arenal de Guadalupe, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14388, Mexico)

  • Héctor Nahún Quintero Milián

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Institute for the Future of Education, Monterrey 64849, Mexico)

  • Pedro Daniel Urbina Coronado

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Science, Monterrey 64849, Mexico)

  • Ana Yael Vanoye García

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Science, Monterrey 64849, Mexico)

Abstract

Despite the plethora of studies reported during the last decade in relation to educational innovation in teaching and assessment of competencies, a consensus is seemingly lacking on a definition that establishes the scope and boundaries competency assessment. This research gap motivated a systematic review of the literature published on the topics of “educational innovation in teaching” and “assessment of competencies” in upper secondary and higher education during the period from January 2016 to March 2021. The main objective of the study was to define and evaluate educational innovation in teaching and assessment of competencies in upper secondary and higher education following PRISMA guidelines for a systematic literature review (SLR) on a curated corpus of 320 articles. We intended to answer the following questions: (1) What do “educational innovation in teaching” and “assessment of competencies” represent for upper secondary and higher education? (2) How are they evaluated? Lastly, (3) are efforts exerted toward the standardization of transversal competencies? The SLR seeks answers to these questions by examining nine research sub-queries. The result indicated that the greatest effort toward educational innovation in competencies was made at the higher education level and targeted students. Competencies were revised through associations with the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda. In addition, the methodologies used for teaching and evaluation of competencies were reviewed. Finally, the study discussed which technologies were used to develop the proficiencies of students.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Krstikj & Juan Sosa Godina & Luciano García Bañuelos & Omar Israel González Peña & Héctor Nahún Quintero Milián & Pedro Daniel Urbina Coronado & Ana Yael Vanoye García, 2022. "Analysis of Competency Assessment of Educational Innovation in Upper Secondary School and Higher Education: A Mapping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8089-:d:854179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gustavo Morán-Soto & Juan Antonio Valdivia Vázquez & Omar Israel González Peña, 2022. "Adaptation Process of the Mathematic Self-Efficacy Survey (MSES) Scale to Mexican-Spanish Language," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Graciano Dieck-Assad & Alfonso Ávila-Ortega & Omar Israel González Peña, 2021. "Comparing Competency Assessment in Electronics Engineering Education with and without Industry Training Partner by Challenge-Based Learning Oriented to Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Kipper, Liane Mahlmann & Iepsen, Sandra & Dal Forno, Ana Julia & Frozza, Rejane & Furstenau, Leonardo & Agnes, Jéssica & Cossul, Danielli, 2021. "Scientific mapping to identify competencies required by industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Jing Lu, 2020. "Data Analytics Research-Informed Teaching in a Digital Technologies Curriculum," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 57-72, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gustavo Morán-Soto & Aradaryn Marsh & Omar Israel González Peña & Matthew Sheppard & José Isabel Gómez-Quiñones & Lisa C. Benson, 2022. "Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Sense of Belonging in Higher Education for STEM Students in the United States and Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Gustavo Morán-Soto & Omar Israel González Peña, 2022. "Second Phase of the Adaptation Process of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy Survey (MSES) for the Mexican–Spanish Language: The Confirmation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Jorge Sanabria-Z & Berenice Alfaro-Ponce & Omar Israel González Peña & Hugo Terashima-Marín & José Carlos Ortiz-Bayliss, 2022. "Engagement and Social Impact in Tech-Based Citizen Science Initiatives for Achieving the SDGs: A Systematic Literature Review with a Perspective on Complex Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen Díaz-López & Alessandra Bonoli & María Martín-Morales & Montserrat Zamorano, 2021. "Analysis of the Scientific Evolution of the Circular Economy Applied to Construction and Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Ludoviko Zirimenya & Fatima Mahmud-Ajeigbe & Ruth McQuillan & You Li, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between urogenital schistosomiasis and HIV/AIDS infection," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Trang Nguyen & Sara Holton & Thach Tran & Jane Fisher, 2019. "Informal mental health interventions for people with severe mental illness in low and lower middle-income countries: A systematic review of effectiveness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(3), pages 194-206, May.
    4. Alessandro Concari & Gerjo Kok & Pim Martens, 2020. "A Systematic Literature Review of Concepts and Factors Related to Pro-Environmental Consumer Behaviour in Relation to Waste Management Through an Interdisciplinary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-50, May.
    5. Damiano Pizzol & Mike Trott & Igor Grabovac & Mario Antunes & Anna Claudia Colangelo & Simona Ippoliti & Cristian Petre Ilie & Anne Carrie & Nicola Veronese & Lee Smith, 2021. "Laparoscopy in Low-Income Countries: 10-Year Experience and Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Alessandro Margherita & Emanuele Banchi & Alfredo Biffi & Gianluca di Castri & Rocco Morelli, 2022. "Beyond Total Cost Management (TCM) to Systemic Value Management (SVM): Transformational Trends and a Research Manifesto for an Evolving Discipline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    8. Evans, Rhiannon & White, James & Turley, Ruth & Slater, Thomas & Morgan, Helen & Strange, Heather & Scourfield, Jonathan, 2017. "Comparison of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and suicide in children and young people in care and non-care populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 122-129.
    9. Hang-Nga Mai & Jaeil Kim & Youn-Hee Choi & Du-Hyeong Lee, 2020. "Accuracy of Portable Face-Scanning Devices for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Face Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. D. L. I. H. K. Peiris & Yanping Duan & Corneel Vandelanotte & Wei Liang & Min Yang & Julien Steven Baker, 2022. "Effects of In-Classroom Physical Activity Breaks on Children’s Academic Performance, Cognition, Health Behaviours and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Tr," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-27, August.
    11. Stephanie Kovacs & Stephen E Hawes & Stephen N Maley & Emily Mosites & Ling Wong & Andy Stergachis, 2014. "Technologies for Detecting Falsified and Substandard Drugs in Low and Middle-Income Countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    12. Najmiatul Fitria & Antoinette D. I. Asselt & Maarten J. Postma, 2019. "Cost-effectiveness of controlling gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(3), pages 407-417, April.
    13. Hyun Woo Lee & Jung Kyu Lee & Eunyoung Kim & Jae-Joon Yim & Chang-Hoon Lee, 2016. "The Effectiveness and Safety of Fluoroquinolone-Containing Regimen as a First-Line Treatment for Drug-Sensitive Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Jung Soo Kim & Jinkyeong Park & Seong Yong Lim & Yeon-Mok Oh & Kwang Ha Yoo & Yong Bum Park & Seung Soo Sheen & Min-Ji Kim & K C Carriere & Ji Ye Jung & Hye Yun Park, 2015. "Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety between Indacaterol and Tiotropium in COPD: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Giuseppe La Torre & Remigio Bova & Rosario Andrea Cocchiara & Cristina Sestili & Anna Tagliaferri & Simona Maggiacomo & Camilla Foschi & William Zomparelli & Maria Vittoria Manai & David Shaholli & Va, 2023. "What Are the Determinants of the Quality of Systematic Reviews in the International Journals of Occupational Medicine? A Methodological Study Review of Published Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
    16. Eric P F Chow & Joseph D Tucker & Frank Y Wong & Eric J Nehl & Yanjie Wang & Xun Zhuang & Lei Zhang, 2014. "Disparities and Risks of Sexually Transmissible Infections among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: A Meta-Analysis and Data Synthesis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Ricky D Turgeon & Michael R Kolber & Peter Loewen & Ursula Ellis & James P McCormack, 2019. "Higher versus lower doses of ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-2 receptor blockers and beta-blockers in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Adrián Csordás & Péter Lengyel & István Füzesi, 2022. "Who Prefers Regional Products? A Systematic Literature Review of Consumer Characteristics and Attitudes in Short Food Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    20. Bertha Leticia Treviño-Elizondo & Heriberto García-Reyes & Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García, 2023. "A Maturity Model to Become a Smart Organization Based on Lean and Industry 4.0 Synergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8089-:d:854179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.