IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7233-d837750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development Competences of Engineering Students in Light of the Industry 5.0 Concept

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Mazur

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 38 Nadbystrzycka Street, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anna Walczyna

    (Department of Strategy and Business Planning, Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 38 Nadbystrzycka Street, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

In 2021, the European Commission set out the direction of changes in the field of European enterprise activities by establishing the principles of Industry 5.0. One of the indicated directions was the implementation of sustainable development principles in European industry. The aim of this article is to examine the level and nature of competences in the field of sustainable development among students at two Lublin universities: the Lublin University of Technology and the University of Life Sciences in Lublin. This is to enable the assessment of students’ preparation for the implementation of sustainable development principles in their future professional activities. The research sought to determine the relationship between the type of university and the competences of students, through the self-assessment of competences. The conceptualization and operationalization of competences in the field of sustainable development was based on the de Haan and Cebrian models, respectively. The tool used was the author’s own questionnaire based on the self-assessment of 25 statements, grouped into five areas of competence: knowledge, action, values and ethics, emotions and systems thinking. The results of the study confirmed differences between students in the areas of knowledge and activity. However, a relationship between the type of university and self-esteem in areas related to systemic thinking, emotions, and ethics and values was not found. Various self-assessment patterns (clusters) were observed in individual areas among the respondents. Differences in the assessment of the statements indicated the existence of factors that influenced responses. The results of the study confirmed the usefulness of the tool in identifying competency gaps of students based on which the tool can be recommended for use in the design of study programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna, 2022. "Sustainable Development Competences of Engineering Students in Light of the Industry 5.0 Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7233-:d:837750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7233/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7233/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Łukasz Sułkowski & Katarzyna Kolasińska-Morawska & Robert Seliga & Piotr Buła & Paweł Morawski, 2021. "Sustainability Culture of Polish Universities in Professionalization of Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna & Matylda Bojar, 2021. "Structure of Competences of Lublin University of Technology Students in the Field of Sustainable Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 394-404.
    3. Karel Mulder, 2004. "Engineering education in sustainable development: sustainability as a tool to open up the windows of engineering institutions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 275-285, July.
    4. Franziska Bertschy & Christine Künzli & Meret Lehmann, 2013. "Teachers’ Competencies for the Implementation of Educational Offers in the Field of Education for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Fátima Poza-Vilches & Abigail López-Alcarria & Nerea Mazuecos-Ciarra, 2019. "A Professional Competences’ Diagnosis in Education for Sustainability: A Case Study from the Standpoint of the Education Guidance Service (EGS) in the Spanish Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Charrad, Malika & Ghazzali, Nadia & Boiteau, Véronique & Niknafs, Azam, 2014. "NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 61(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Lohmann & Jennifer Breithecker & Ulrike Ohl & Petra Gieß-Stüber & Hans Peter Brandl-Bredenbeck, 2021. "Teachers’ Professional Action Competence in Education for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review from the Perspective of Physical Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Bolívar, Fernando & Duran, Miguel A. & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2023. "Bank business models, size, and profitability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Reder, Maik & Yürüşen, Nurseda Y. & Melero, Julio J., 2018. "Data-driven learning framework for associating weather conditions and wind turbine failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 554-569.
    4. Marcin Gąsior, 2021. "Environmental Attitudes and Willingness to Purchase Online—Classification Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Kifah Imara & Fahriye Altinay, 2021. "Integrating Education for Sustainable Development Competencies in Teacher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Maria Victoria G. Violanda & Dennis V. Madrigal, 2021. "Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): A Journey Towards Sustainable Future," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 20(1), pages 172-180, June.
    7. Roopam Shukla & Ankit Agarwal & Kamna Sachdeva & Juergen Kurths & P. K. Joshi, 2019. "Climate change perception: an analysis of climate change and risk perceptions among farmer types of Indian Western Himalayas," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 103-119, January.
    8. Susanne Kubisch & Sandra Parth & Veronika Deisenrieder & Karin Oberauer & Johann Stötter & Lars Keller, 2020. "From Transdisciplinary Research to Transdisciplinary Education—The Role of Schools in Contributing to Community Well-Being and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Michael Godfrey & Andrew Manikas, 2012. "Integrating Triple Bottom Line Sustainability Concepts Into A Supplier Selection Exercise," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12.
    10. Saemi Shin & Won Suck Yoon & Sang-Hoon Byeon, 2022. "Trends in Occupational Infectious Diseases in South Korea and Classification of Industries According to the Risk of Biological Hazards Using K-Means Clustering," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Sung-Shun Weng & Yang Liu & Juan Dai & Yen-Ching Chuang, 2020. "A Novel Improvement Strategy of Competency for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) of University Teachers Based on Data Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Song He & Xinyu Song & Xiaoxi Yang & Jijun Yu & Yuqi Wen & Lianlian Wu & Bowei Yan & Jiannan Feng & Xiaochen Bo, 2021. "COMSUC: A web server for the identification of consensus molecular subtypes of cancer based on multiple methods and multi-omics data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-10, March.
    13. Jihane El Ouadi & Hanae Errousso & Nicolas Malhene & Siham Benhadou & Hicham Medromi, 2022. "A machine-learning based hybrid algorithm for strategic location of urban bundling hubs to support shared public transport," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3215-3258, October.
    14. Cyril Atkinson-Clement & Eléonore Pigalle, 2021. "What can we learn from Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on human behaviour? The case of France’s lockdown," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Kreitmair, Ursula & Bower-Bir, Jacob, 2021. "Too different to solve climate change? Experimental evidence on the effects of production and benefit heterogeneity on collective action," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Silvia Albareda-Tiana & Salvador Vidal-Raméntol & Maria Pujol-Valls & Mónica Fernández-Morilla, 2018. "Holistic Approaches to Develop Sustainability and Research Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Training," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Getaneh Addis Tessema & Jan van der Borg & Anton Van Rompaey & Steven Van Passel & Enyew Adgo & Amare Sewnet Minale & Kerebih Asrese & Amaury Frankl & Jean Poesen, 2022. "Benefit Segmentation of Tourists to Geosites and Its Implications for Sustainable Development of Geotourism in the Southern Lake Tana Region, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    18. repec:thr:techub:10020:y:2021:i:1:p:172-180 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Young Hyun Kim & Kug Jin Jeon & Chena Lee & Yoon Joo Choi & Hoi-In Jung & Sang-Sun Han, 2021. "Analysis of the mandibular canal course using unsupervised machine learning algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-13, November.
    20. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    21. Ben Beck & Meghan Winters & Trisalyn Nelson & Chris Pettit & Simone Z Leao & Meead Saberi & Jason Thompson & Sachith Seneviratne & Kerry Nice & Mark Stevenson, 2023. "Developing urban biking typologies: Quantifying the complex interactions of bicycle ridership, bicycle network and built environment characteristics," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 7-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7233-:d:837750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.