IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6880-d831877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weed Communities in Winter Wheat: Responses to Cropping Systems under Different Climatic Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Seipel

    (Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Suzanne L. Ishaq

    (School of Food and Agriculture, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA)

  • Christian Larson

    (Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Fabian D. Menalled

    (Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

Abstract

Understanding the impact of biological and environmental stressors on cropping systems is essential to secure the long-term sustainability of agricultural production in the face of unprecedented climatic conditions. This study evaluated the effect of increased soil temperature and reduced moisture across three contrasting cropping systems: a no-till chemically managed system, a tilled organic system, and an organic system that used grazing to reduce tillage intensity. Results showed that while cropping system characteristics represent a major driver in structuring weed communities, the short-term impact of changes in temperature and moisture conditions appear to be more subtle. Weed community responses to temperature and moisture manipulations differed across variables: while biomass, species richness, and Simpson’s diversity estimates were not affected by temperature and moisture conditions, we observed a minor but significant shift in weed community composition. Higher weed biomass was recorded in the grazed/reduced-till organic system compared with the tilled-organic and no-till chemically managed systems. Weed communities in the two organic systems were more diverse than in the no-till conventional system, but an increased abundance in perennial species such as Cirsium arvense and Taraxacum officinale in the grazed/reduced-till organic system could hinder the adoption of integrated crop-livestock production tactics. Species composition of the no-till conventional weed communities showed low species richness and diversity, and was encompassed in the grazed/reduced-till organic communities. The weed communities of the no-till conventional and grazed/reduced-till organic systems were distinct from the tilled organic community, underscoring the effect that tillage has on the assembly of weed communities. Results highlight the importance of understanding the ecological mechanisms structuring weed communities, and integrating multiple tactics to reduce off-farm inputs while managing weeds.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Seipel & Suzanne L. Ishaq & Christian Larson & Fabian D. Menalled, 2022. "Weed Communities in Winter Wheat: Responses to Cropping Systems under Different Climatic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6880-:d:831877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6880/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6880/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subodh Adhikari & Fabian D. Menalled, 2018. "Impacts of Dryland Farm Management Systems on Weeds and Ground Beetles (Carabidae) in the Northern Great Plains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Bruna Irene Grimberg & Selena Ahmed & Colter Ellis & Zachariah Miller & Fabian Menalled, 2018. "Climate Change Perceptions and Observations of Agricultural Stakeholders in the Northern Great Plains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Fabian D. Menalled & Robert K. D. Peterson & Richard G. Smith & William S. Curran & David J. Páez & Bruce D. Maxwell, 2016. "The Eco-Evolutionary Imperative: Revisiting Weed Management in the Midst of an Herbicide Resistance Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Peterson, Caitlin A. & Eviner, Valerie T. & Gaudin, Amélie C.M., 2018. "Ways forward for resilience research in agroecosystems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 19-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Subodh Adhikari & Arjun Adhikari & David K. Weaver & Anton Bekkerman & Fabian D. Menalled, 2019. "Impacts of Agricultural Management Systems on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Highly Simplified Dryland Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Michael Carolan, 2020. "Filtering perceptions of climate change and biotechnology: values and views among Colorado farmers and ranchers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 121-139, March.
    3. Marcela Prokopová & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Ondřej Cudlín & Renata Včeláková & Radek Plch & Pavel Cudlín, 2019. "Envisioning Present and Future Land-Use Change under Varying Ecological Regimes and Their Influence on Landscape Stability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio & Barbara, Soriano & Isabel, Bardaji & Alberto, Garrido, 2022. "Analysis of perceived robustness, adaptability and transformability of Spanish extensive livestock farms under alternative challenging scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Sifat E. Rabbi & Reza Shant & Sourav Karmakar & Azhar Habib & Jürgen P. Kropp, 2021. "Regional mapping of climate variability index and identifying socio-economic factors influencing farmer’s perception in Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 11050-11066, July.
    6. Paul J. Croft, 2019. "Environmental Hazards: A Coverage Response Approach," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Sean McKenzie & Hilary Parkinson & Jane Mangold & Mary Burrows & Selena Ahmed & Fabian Menalled, 2018. "Perceptions, Experiences, and Priorities Supporting Agroecosystem Management Decisions Differ among Agricultural Producers, Consultants, and Researchers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Norman Siebrecht, 2020. "Sustainable Agriculture and Its Implementation Gap—Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, May.
    9. Adam M. Komarek, 2018. "Conservation agriculture in western China increases productivity and profits without decreasing resilience," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(5), pages 1251-1262, October.
    10. Fabricius, C. & Novellie, P. & Ringler, C. & Uhlenbrook, Stefan & Wright, D., 2022. "Resilience in agro-ecological landscapes: process principles and outcome indicators," IWMI Reports 329157, International Water Management Institute.
    11. Alejandro Cleves & Eva Youkhana & Javier Toro, 2022. "A Method to Assess Agroecosystem Resilience to Climate Variability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-26, July.
    12. Wang, Kui & Zhang, Yuanyuan & Sekelj, Gasper & Hopke, Philip K., 2019. "Economic analysis of a field monitored residential wood pellet boiler heating system in New York State," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 500-511.
    13. Karla L. Gage & Ronald F. Krausz & S. Alan Walters, 2019. "Emerging Challenges for Weed Management in Herbicide-Resistant Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Macedo, Ignacio & Roel, Alvaro & Velazco, José Ignacio & Bordagorri, Alexander & Terra, José A. & Pittelkow, Cameron M., 2022. "Intensification of rice-pasture rotations with annual crops reduces the stability of sustainability across productivity, economic, and environmental indicators," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    15. Walter Musakwa & Ephraim Mpofu & Nesisa Analisa Nyathi, 2020. "Local Community Perceptions on Landscape Change, Ecosystem Services, Climate Change, and Livelihoods in Gonarezhou National Park, Zimbabwe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Yevheniia Varyvoda & Douglas Taren, 2022. "Considering Ecosystem Services in Food System Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Szymczak, Leonardo Silvestri & Carvalho, Paulo César de Faccio & Lurette, Amandine & Moraes, Anibal de & Nunes, Pedro Arthur de Albuquerque & Martins, Amanda Posselt & Moulin, Charles-Henri, 2020. "System diversification and grazing management as resilience-enhancing agricultural practices: The case of crop-livestock integration," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. A. Koocheki & M. Nassiri Mahallati & M. Bannayan & F. Yaghoubi, 2022. "Simulating resilience of rainfed wheat–based cropping systems of Iran under future climate change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1-30, April.
    19. T. S. Amjath-Babu & Timothy J. Krupnik & Shakuntala H. Thilsted & Andrew J. McDonald, 2020. "Key indicators for monitoring food system disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from Bangladesh towards effective response," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(4), pages 761-768, August.
    20. Sandile Birthwell Ndwandwe & Ruey-Chee Weng, 2018. "Competitive Analyses of the Pig Industry in Swaziland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6880-:d:831877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.