IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6420-d822908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Design of Subway Train Cross-Line Operation Scheme Based on Passenger Smart Card Data

Author

Listed:
  • Maosheng Li

    (School of traffic and transportation engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Hangcong Li

    (School of traffic and transportation engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

The network operation of the subway can reduce the number of passenger transfers and improve subway operation efficiency. Based on the subway smart card data, this paper proposes an optimal design method for the cross-line operation scheme of subway trains. The method firstly calculates the OD matrix between subway stations, the passenger section flow, and the transfer flow according to the passenger smart card data. It then optimizes the design of the subway train cross-line operation plan, including determining the routing type of cross-line operation and the number of trains running. Finally, for the lines with cross-line operation conditions in the urban subway system, we design the cross-line operation schemes under all possible combinations. According to the volume of the cross-line passenger flow that the cross-line trains can carry, the top-ranked operation plans are preferably recommended. Taking the Chengdu subway network as an example, the research results show that, in the Chengdu subway network, the North Railway Station, Xibo City Station, and South Railway Station bear the highest transfer demand. The transfer demands that can be undertaken by cross-line trains are 23,934, 16,710, and 13,024 trips per hour, respectively. This shows that the proposed design method can accurately and reasonably screen out the transfer stations and lines with an urgent need for cross-line trains.

Suggested Citation

  • Maosheng Li & Hangcong Li, 2022. "Optimal Design of Subway Train Cross-Line Operation Scheme Based on Passenger Smart Card Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6420-:d:822908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6420/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6420/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Liu & Xiaoning Zhu & Liujiang Kang, 2015. "Real-Time Track Reallocation for Emergency Incidents at Large Railway Stations," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-11, November.
    2. Filip Matêjka & Alisdair McKay, 2015. "Rational Inattention to Discrete Choices: A New Foundation for the Multinomial Logit Model," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 272-298, January.
    3. Kim, Kyoungok, 2018. "Exploring the difference between ridership patterns of subway and taxi: Case study in Seoul," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 213-223.
    4. Zwaneveld, Peter J. & Kroon, Leo G. & van Hoesel, Stan P. M., 2001. "Routing trains through a railway station based on a node packing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 14-33, January.
    5. Yong, Nuo & Ni, Shunjiang & Shen, Shifei & Chen, Peng & Ji, Xuewei, 2018. "Uncovering stable and occasional human mobility patterns: A case study of the Beijing subway," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 492(C), pages 28-38.
    6. Qian, Yongsheng & Da, Cheng & Zeng, Junwei & Wang, Xuexin & Zhang, Yongzhi & Xu, Dejie, 2022. "A bidirectional quasi-moving block cellular automaton model for single-track railways," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 598(C).
    7. Shenghan Zhou & Houxiang Liu & Bo Wang & Bang Chen & Yuliang Zhou & Wenbing Chang, 2021. "Public Norms in the Operation Scheme of Urban Rail Transit Express Trains: The Case of the Beijing Changping Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Wenliang Zhou & Mehdi Oldache, 2021. "Integrated Optimization of Line Planning, Timetabling and Rolling Stock Allocation for Urban Railway Lines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-32, November.
    9. Eun Hak Lee & Inmook Lee & Shin-Hyung Cho & Seung-Young Kho & Dong-Kyu Kim, 2019. "A Travel Behavior-Based Skip-Stop Strategy Considering Train Choice Behaviors Based on Smartcard Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingliu Xu & Zhimei Wang & Shangjun Yao & Jiarong Xue, 2022. "Train Operations Organization in High-Speed Railway Station Considering Variable Configuration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Yidong Wang & Rui Song & Shiwei He & Zilong Song, 2022. "Train Routing and Track Allocation Optimization Model of Multi-Station High-Speed Railway Hub," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Sushant Acharya & Shu Lin Wee, 2020. "Rational Inattention in Hiring Decisions," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-40, January.
    4. Philippe Jehiel & Jakub Steiner, 2020. "Selective Sampling with Information-Storage Constraints [On interim rationality, belief formation and learning in decision problems with bounded memory]," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(630), pages 1753-1781.
    5. Luminita Stevens, 2020. "Coarse Pricing Policies," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 87(1), pages 420-453.
    6. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Atahan Afsar; José Elías Gallegos; Richard Jaimes; Edgar Silgado Gómez & José Elías Gallegos & Richard Jaimes & Edgar Silgado Gómez, 2020. "Reconciling Empirics and Theory: The Behavioral Hybrid New Keynesian Model," Vniversitas Económica 18560, Universidad Javeriana - Bogotá.
    8. Larionov, Daniil & Pham, Hien & Yamashita, Takuro & Zhu, Shuguang, 2021. "First Best Implementation with Costly Information Acquisition," TSE Working Papers 21-1261, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Apr 2022.
    9. Lindbeck, Assar & Weibull, Jörgen, 2020. "Delegation of investment decisions, and optimal remuneration of agents," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Olivier Gossner & Christoph Kuzmics, 2019. "Preferences Under Ignorance," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 60(1), pages 241-257, February.
    11. Brocas, Isabelle & Carrillo, Juan D., 2021. "Value computation and modulation: A neuroeconomic theory of self-control as constrained optimization," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    12. Scharfenaker, Ellis, 2020. "Implications of quantal response statistical equilibrium," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. Alan Kirman & François Laisney & Paul Pezanis-Christou, 2023. "Relaxing the symmetry assumption in participation games: a specification test for cluster-heterogeneity," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(4), pages 850-878, September.
    14. Assenza, T. & Heemeijer, P. & Hommes, C.H. & Massaro, D., 2021. "Managing self-organization of expectations through monetary policy: A macro experiment," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 170-186.
    15. Alex Nikolsko‐Rzhevskyy & Oleksandr Talavera & Nam Vu, 2023. "The flood that caused a drought," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(4), pages 965-981, October.
    16. Nchare, Karim, 2021. "Dogit model and rational inattention," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Adriana Cornea‐Madeira & João Madeira, 2022. "Econometric Analysis of Switching Expectations in UK Inflation," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(3), pages 651-673, June.
    18. Sosung Baik & Sung-Ha Hwang, 2021. "Auction design with ambiguity: Optimality of the first-price and all-pay auctions," Papers 2110.08563, arXiv.org.
    19. Bartosz Maćkowiak & Filip Matějka & Mirko Wiederholt, 2023. "Rational Inattention: A Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 226-273, March.
    20. Kondor, Péter & Zawadowski, Adam, 2019. "Learning in crowded markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6420-:d:822908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.