IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p443-d715763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Stakeholder Pressures Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Ma Ying

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • He Shan

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Gashaw Awoke Tikuye

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

In today’s globalized world, one of the great challenges for enterprises is integrating CSR adoption into their operations. The study aims to investigate how stakeholder pressure influences the adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices by Chinese medium and large-scale manufacturing enterprises in Ethiopia. This study used a mixed-methods research approach that includes primary and secondary data sources. The employed research data were analyzed using stakeholder theory, structural equation modeling, and multivariate regression analysis to identify the causal relationship between the stakeholder pressures and CSR adoption. The finding shows that overseas Chinese medium and large-scale enterprises at least have CSR awareness to meet compliance requirements. Comparatively, employees, community, and customers are the most influential and significant factors determining the enterprises’ stakeholder pressure on the CSR engagement. The finding indicates that Chinese enterprises are unrecognized for their CSR contribution due to a lack of public relation in displaying what they display the firms are doing. There is no strong link between Chinese manufacturing enterprises and the regulatory stakeholders to implement inclusive CSR awareness and eliminate conflicts of interest on legal frameworks. The study proposed some recommendations to solve the gaps regarding indifference to CSR adoption, the community’s lack of concern for CSR, and lack of proactive involvement. Government laws are required to legally control unbalanced practices and distorted views, as well as to guide fixing conflicts of interest. These finding are important for enterprises, policymakers, government officials, and local and foreign investors to identify, understand, and use the driving factors of stakeholder pressures on CSR practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma Ying & He Shan & Gashaw Awoke Tikuye, 2021. "How Do Stakeholder Pressures Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:443-:d:715763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/443/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafał Kowalczyk & Wioleta Kucharska, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility practices incomes and outcomes: Stakeholders' pressure, culture, employee commitment, corporate reputation, and brand performance. A Polish–German cross‐country study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 595-615, March.
    2. Chiou, Chyi-Lun & Shu, Pei-Gi, 2019. "How does foreign pressure affect a firm's corporate social performance? Evidence from listed firms in Taiwan," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-22.
    3. Carol Newman & John Rand & Finn Tarp & Neda Trifkovic, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility in a Competitive Business Environment," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 1455-1472, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haifei Wang & Hongjun Wu & Peter Humphreys, 2022. "Chinese Merchant Group Culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Cost of Debt: Evidence from Private Listed Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Yuan Wu & Jin Zhang & Shoulin Liu & Lianrui Ma, 2022. "Does Government-Led Publicity Enhance Corporate Green Behavior? Empirical Evidence from Green Xuanguan in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Adomako & Nguyen P. Nguyen, 2020. "Politically connected firms and corporate social responsibility implementation expenditure in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence from Ghana," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2701-2711, November.
    2. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: A literature review," OSF Preprints teyxm, Center for Open Science.
    3. Edina Molnár & Asif Mahmood & Naveed Ahmad & Amir Ikram & Shah Ali Murtaza, 2021. "The Interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Ethical Leadership, Quality of Work Life and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Case of Healthcare Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Minh, Thanh Nguyen & Quang, Tuyen Tran, 2022. "The effects of corporate social responsibility on firm efficiency: Inside the matrix of corporate finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    5. Nguyen, Ngoc Thang & Vu, Van Huong, 2023. "How does adopting occupational health and safety management practices affect outcomes for employees? The case of Vietnamese SMEs," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 629-640.
    6. Neda Trifkovic, 2024. "Certifiable management standards, labor productivity, and worker wages: Evidence from the food sector in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 161-184, January.
    7. Tolossa Fufa Gulema & Yadessa Tadesse Roba, 2021. "Internal and external determinants of corporate social responsibility practices in multinational enterprise subsidiaries in developing countries: evidence from Ethiopia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos & Joaquim Gonçalves, 2020. "Critical analysis of information about integrated management systems and environmental policy on the Portuguese firms' website, towards sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1069-1088, March.
    9. Alexandra Danila & Maria-Gabriela Horga & Oana Oprisan & Tanase Stamule, 2022. "Good Practices on ESG Reporting in the Context of the European Green Deal," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(61), pages 847-847, August.
    10. Laszlo Goerke, 2022. "Trade unions and corporate social responsibility," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 177-203, March.
    11. Yubin Zheng & Md. Harun Ur Rashid & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Wei Wei & Syed Zabid Hossain, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Firm’s Productivity: Evidence from the Banking Industry in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Won‐Moo Hur & Tae‐Won Moon & Hanna Kim, 2020. "When and how does customer engagement in CSR initiatives lead to greater CSR participation? The role of CSR credibility and customer–company identification," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1878-1891, July.
    13. Naveed Ahmad & Miklas Scholz & Muhammad Zulqarnain Arshad & Syed Khuram Ali Jafri & Raja Irfan Sabir & Waris Ali Khan & Heesup Han, 2021. "The Inter-Relation of Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Servant Leadership, and Innovative Work Behavior in the Time of Crisis from the Healthcare Sector of Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Sanjay Kumar Singh & Sanjaya S. Gaur, 2020. "Corporate growth, sustainability and business ethics in twenty-first century," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(2), pages 303-305, June.
    15. Mir Danial Mousavi & Mir Damoun Mousavi, 2023. "The Effect of Stakeholder’s Pressure on firm Market Performance and the Mediating Role of Corporate Responsibility, Sustainable Supplier Selection, and Marketing Capability," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 179-191, August.
    16. Naveed Ahmad & Zia Ullah & Asif Mahmood & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Heesup Han & Miklas Scholz, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility at the Micro-Level as a “New Organizational Value” for Sustainability: Are Females More Aligned towards It?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Minh-Hieu Le & Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh, 2023. "The moderating effects of power distance on corporate social responsibility and multinational enterprises performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2503-2533, October.
    18. Minh, Thanh Nguyen & Ngoc, Anh Mai & Tuan, Anh Nguyen & Dao, Tung Nguyen, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility, market rivalry and firm leverage: new evidence from a fixed-effect quantile regression approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    19. Wioleta Kucharska, 2020. "Employee Commitment Matters for CSR Practice, Reputation and Corporate Brand Performance—European Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Alice Mazzucchelli & Roberto Chierici & Manlio Del Giudice & Ilenia Bua, 2022. "Do circular economy practices affect corporate performance? Evidence from Italian large‐sized manufacturing firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2016-2029, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:443-:d:715763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.