IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p443-d715763.html

How Do Stakeholder Pressures Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Ma Ying

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • He Shan

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Gashaw Awoke Tikuye

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

In today’s globalized world, one of the great challenges for enterprises is integrating CSR adoption into their operations. The study aims to investigate how stakeholder pressure influences the adoption of corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices by Chinese medium and large-scale manufacturing enterprises in Ethiopia. This study used a mixed-methods research approach that includes primary and secondary data sources. The employed research data were analyzed using stakeholder theory, structural equation modeling, and multivariate regression analysis to identify the causal relationship between the stakeholder pressures and CSR adoption. The finding shows that overseas Chinese medium and large-scale enterprises at least have CSR awareness to meet compliance requirements. Comparatively, employees, community, and customers are the most influential and significant factors determining the enterprises’ stakeholder pressure on the CSR engagement. The finding indicates that Chinese enterprises are unrecognized for their CSR contribution due to a lack of public relation in displaying what they display the firms are doing. There is no strong link between Chinese manufacturing enterprises and the regulatory stakeholders to implement inclusive CSR awareness and eliminate conflicts of interest on legal frameworks. The study proposed some recommendations to solve the gaps regarding indifference to CSR adoption, the community’s lack of concern for CSR, and lack of proactive involvement. Government laws are required to legally control unbalanced practices and distorted views, as well as to guide fixing conflicts of interest. These finding are important for enterprises, policymakers, government officials, and local and foreign investors to identify, understand, and use the driving factors of stakeholder pressures on CSR practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma Ying & He Shan & Gashaw Awoke Tikuye, 2021. "How Do Stakeholder Pressures Affect Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:443-:d:715763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/443/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rafał Kowalczyk & Wioleta Kucharska, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility practices incomes and outcomes: Stakeholders' pressure, culture, employee commitment, corporate reputation, and brand performance. A Polish–German cross‐country study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 595-615, March.
    2. Chiou, Chyi-Lun & Shu, Pei-Gi, 2019. "How does foreign pressure affect a firm's corporate social performance? Evidence from listed firms in Taiwan," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-22.
    3. Carol Newman & John Rand & Finn Tarp & Neda Trifkovic, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility in a Competitive Business Environment," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 1455-1472, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haifei Wang & Hongjun Wu & Peter Humphreys, 2022. "Chinese Merchant Group Culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Cost of Debt: Evidence from Private Listed Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Yuan Wu & Jin Zhang & Shoulin Liu & Lianrui Ma, 2022. "Does Government-Led Publicity Enhance Corporate Green Behavior? Empirical Evidence from Green Xuanguan in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Adomako & Nguyen P. Nguyen, 2020. "Politically connected firms and corporate social responsibility implementation expenditure in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence from Ghana," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2701-2711, November.
    2. Nurul Islam & Faruk Bhuiyan & Shamsul Karim, 2026. "Sustainability Practices in SMEs: An Explorative Study on Ethnic Minority–Owned SMEs in the United Kingdom," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4189-4209, March.
    3. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: A literature review," OSF Preprints teyxm, Center for Open Science.
    4. Sun, Lihua & Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2024. "Environmental and social performance relationships to firm efficiency: Evidence from the semiconductor industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    5. Edina Molnár & Asif Mahmood & Naveed Ahmad & Amir Ikram & Shah Ali Murtaza, 2021. "The Interplay between Corporate Social Responsibility at Employee Level, Ethical Leadership, Quality of Work Life and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Case of Healthcare Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Minh, Thanh Nguyen & Quang, Tuyen Tran, 2022. "The effects of corporate social responsibility on firm efficiency: Inside the matrix of corporate finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    7. Asunción Agulló-Torres & Francisco-José Del Campo-Gomis & David-Bernardo López-Lluch & Irene Arias-Navarro, 2026. "Evaluation of the environmental commitment of all large and medium-sized Spanish wineries based on objective information from their websites," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 72(3), pages 190-206.
    8. Nguyen, Ngoc Thang & Vu, Van Huong, 2023. "How does adopting occupational health and safety management practices affect outcomes for employees? The case of Vietnamese SMEs," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 629-640.
    9. Cyrine Mhiri & Aymen Ajina & Nazim Hussain & Bernard Mnzava & Monika Wieczorek‐Kosmala, 2025. "Corporate social responsibility and capital structure: Moderating effect of culture," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 698-717, January.
    10. Neda Trifkovic, 2024. "Certifiable management standards, labor productivity, and worker wages: Evidence from the food sector in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 161-184, January.
    11. Tolossa Fufa Gulema & Yadessa Tadesse Roba, 2021. "Internal and external determinants of corporate social responsibility practices in multinational enterprise subsidiaries in developing countries: evidence from Ethiopia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Filipe Carvalho & Gilberto Santos & Joaquim Gonçalves, 2020. "Critical analysis of information about integrated management systems and environmental policy on the Portuguese firms' website, towards sustainable development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1069-1088, March.
    13. Alexandra Danila & Maria-Gabriela Horga & Oana Oprisan & Tanase Stamule, 2022. "Good Practices on ESG Reporting in the Context of the European Green Deal," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(61), pages 847-847, August.
    14. Herkenhoff, Philipp & Krautheim, Sebastian & Semrau, Finn Ole & Steglich, Frauke, 2024. "Corporate Social Responsibility along the global value chain," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Laszlo Goerke, 2022. "Trade unions and corporate social responsibility," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 177-203, March.
    16. Tongfang Lyu & Qitaisong Shen, 2024. "A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) study on the formation mechanism of Internet platform companies’ social responsibility risks," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Jingjing Huang, 2023. "Doing good in periods of political turnover: the turnover of local officials, local corruption and corporate social responsibility," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(4), pages 781-833, December.
    18. Yubin Zheng & Md. Harun Ur Rashid & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Wei Wei & Syed Zabid Hossain, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Firm’s Productivity: Evidence from the Banking Industry in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Vusala Teymurova & Ilham Huseynli & Boris Miethlich, 2024. "Operation of Organizations and Their Relationship to Corporate Responsibility," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 75-95, March.
    20. Aayad Ahmad Aleid & Amer Alenazy, 2025. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Purchase Intention in Saudi Arabia: Moderating Role of Consumer Awareness," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 20(6), pages 118-118, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:443-:d:715763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.