IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p4781-d542708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crop Yield and Physicochemical Properties of Wheat Grains as Affected by Tillage Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Majid Yousefian

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Lorestan University, KhorramAbad 6815144316, Iran)

  • Feizollah Shahbazi

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Lorestan University, KhorramAbad 6815144316, Iran)

  • Kianoosh Hamidian

    (Department of Seed and Plant Improvement Research, Lorestan Jihad Agricultural Organization, KhorramAbad 6816914116, Iran)

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of tillage systems (TS) on wheat grain yield, yield components, and physicochemical properties under rain-fed conditions over 2 years (2018–2019) in the Kuhdasht region in southwestern Iran. The tillage treatments were a combination of conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT), and no tillage (NT) systems based on randomized complete blocks with three replications. Wheat grain yields and yield components, physical properties (geometrical dimensions, sphericity, thousand-grain mass (TGM), water absorption (WA), volume (V), and density), chemical composition (protein content (PC), water content (WC), fiber content (FC), ash content (AC)), surface color parameters (L*, a*, and b*), and correlations among measured parameters were assessed. The results showed that wheat grain yield and yield components were significantly affected by TS ( p < 0.01). The wheat grain yield was higher under CT (2.72 t ha −1 ), with a significant difference between RT (1.76 t ha −1 ) and NT (1.20 t ha −1 ). The highest TGM (49.19 g) was achieved under CT, followed by RT (43.41 g), with the lowest (39.17 g) in the NT system. TS had significant effects on certain physical properties of wheat grains ( p < 0.01). Wheat grain, size, shape, and mass values were higher under CT than RT and NT systems in all experimental years. CT resulted in the highest WA, while the lowest resulted from NT. TS had no significant influence on the density of the grains. TS had significant effects on PC, AC, and WC values of grains at the 1% probability level and on FC at the 5% level. Higher PC values were obtained under the CT system (13.07%, against 11.90% and 10.67% for RT and NT, respectively) in all growing seasons. Additionally, the AC was significantly lower in the sample grains under RT (2.38%) and NT (2.43%) than in those from CT (2.56). The FC was higher under NT (15.73%) than RT (13.73) and CT (13.71%). The grain WC was significantly higher under NT (7.57%) than RT (6.79%) and CT (7.0%). The TS significantly affected the surface color parameters of grains, while the L* (lightness) and b* (yellowness) values of grains under CT were higher than in RT and NT.

Suggested Citation

  • Majid Yousefian & Feizollah Shahbazi & Kianoosh Hamidian, 2021. "Crop Yield and Physicochemical Properties of Wheat Grains as Affected by Tillage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4781-:d:542708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4781/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4781/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magdalena Ruiz & Encarna Zambrana & Rosario Fite & Aida Sole & Jose Luis Tenorio & Elena Benavente, 2019. "Yield and Quality Performance of Traditional and Improved Bread and Durum Wheat Varieties under Two Conservation Tillage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Shokoofeh Sarikhani Khorami & Seyed Abdolreza Kazemeini & Sadegh Afzalinia & Mahesh Kumar Gathala, 2018. "Changes in Soil Properties and Productivity under Different Tillage Practices and Wheat Genotypes: A Short-Term Study in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Tabatabaeefar, A. & Emamzadeh, H. & Varnamkhasti, M. Ghasemi & Rahimizadeh, R. & Karimi, M., 2009. "Comparison of energy of tillage systems in wheat production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 41-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guiomar Carranza-Gallego & Gloria I. Guzmán & Roberto Garcia-Ruíz & Manuel González de Molina & Eduardo Aguilera, 2019. "Addressing the Role of Landraces in the Sustainability of Mediterranean Agroecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Tabatabaie, Seyed Mohammad Hossein & Rafiee, Shahin & Keyhani, Alireza, 2012. "Energy consumption flow and econometric models of two plum cultivars productions in Tehran province of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 211-216.
    3. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Masilionytė, Laura & Juknevičius, Darius & Buragienė, Sidona & Kriaučiūnienė, Zita, 2019. "Energy use efficiency, GHG emissions, and cost-effectiveness of organic and sustainable fertilisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1151-1160.
    4. Liang, Aizhen & McLaughlin, Neil B. & Ma, B.L. & Gregorich, Edward G. & Morrison, Malcolm J. & Burtt, Stephen D. & Patterson, B. Scott & Evenson, Lynne I., 2013. "Changes in mouldboard plough draught and tractor fuel consumption on continuous corn after 18 years of organic and inorganic N amendments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 89-95.
    5. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Romaneckas, Kęstutis & Jasinskas, Algirdas & Kimbirauskienė, Rasa & Naujokienė, Vilma, 2020. "Improving energy efficiency and environmental mitigation through tillage management in faba bean production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Barut, Zeliha Bereket & Ertekin, Can & Karaagac, Hasan Ali, 2011. "Tillage effects on energy use for corn silage in Mediterranean Coastal of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5466-5475.
    7. Jéssica Bárbara da Silva & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & João Gabriel Távora Pedrosa & Aldo Torres Sales & Everardo Valadares de Sa Barretto Sampaio & Rômulo Simões Cezar Menezes & Emmanuel Damilano, 2022. "Energetic and Economic Analysis of Spineless Cactus Biomass Production in the Brazilian Semi-arid Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Houshyar, Ehsan & Azadi, Hossein & Almassi, Morteza & Sheikh Davoodi, Mohammad Javad & Witlox, Frank, 2012. "Sustainable and efficient energy consumption of corn production in Southwest Iran: Combination of multi-fuzzy and DEA modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 672-681.
    9. Maurice Osewe & Chris Miyinzi Mwungu & Aijun Liu, 2020. "Does Minimum Tillage Improve Smallholder Farmers’ Welfare? Evidence from Southern Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Xuezhang Li & Benhui Wei & Xianli Xu & Jia Zhou, 2020. "Effect of Deep Vertical Rotary Tillage on Soil Properties and Sugarcane Biomass in Rainfed Dry-Land Regions of Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Iosvany López-Sandin & Guadalupe Gutiérrez-Soto & Adriana Gutiérrez-Díez & Nancy Medina-Herrera & Edgar Gutiérrez-Castorena & Francisco Zavala-García, 2019. "Evaluation of the Use of Energy in the Production of Sweet Sorghum ( Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench) under Different Production Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Muazu, A. & Yahya, A. & Ishak, W.I.W. & Khairunniza-Bejo, S., 2015. "Energy audit for sustainable wetland paddy cultivation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 182-191.
    13. André Vizinho & David Avelar & Cristina Branquinho & Tiago Capela Lourenço & Silvia Carvalho & Alice Nunes & Leonor Sucena-Paiva & Hugo Oliveira & Ana Lúcia Fonseca & Filipe Duarte Santos & Maria José, 2021. "Framework for Climate Change Adaptation of Agriculture and Forestry in Mediterranean Climate Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, February.
    14. Mileusnić, Z.I. & Petrović, D.V. & Đević, M.S., 2010. "Comparison of tillage systems according to fuel consumption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 221-228.
    15. Rahman, Sanzidur & Hasan, M. Kamrul, 2014. "Energy productivity and efficiency of wheat farming in Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 107-114.
    16. Ghorbani, Reza & Mondani, Farzad & Amirmoradi, Shahram & Feizi, Hassan & Khorramdel, Surror & Teimouri, Mozhgan & Sanjani, Sara & Anvarkhah, Sepideh & Aghel, Hassan, 2011. "A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 283-288, January.
    17. Alhajj Ali, Salem & Tedone, Luigi & De Mastro, Giuseppe, 2013. "A comparison of the energy consumption of rainfed durum wheat under different management scenarios in southern Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 308-318.
    18. Fekremariam Asargew Mihretie & Atsushi Tsunekawa & Nigussie Haregeweyn & Enyew Adgo & Mitsuru Tsubo & Tsugiyuki Masunaga & Derege Tsegaye Meshesha & Kindiye Ebabu & Muluken Bayable, 2021. "Agro-Economic Evaluation of Alternative Crop Management Options for Teff Production in Midland Agro-Ecology, Ethiopia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Al-Mansour, F. & Jejcic, V., 2017. "A model calculation of the carbon footprint of agricultural products: The case of Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 7-15.
    20. Soltani, Afshin & Rajabi, M.H. & Zeinali, E. & Soltani, Elias, 2013. "Energy inputs and greenhouse gases emissions in wheat production in Gorgan, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 54-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:4781-:d:542708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.