IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1331-d1685003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Superior Wheat Yield and Profitability in Conservation Agriculture with Diversified Rotations vs. Conventional Tillage in Cold Arid Climates

Author

Listed:
  • Harun Cicek

    (Research Institute for Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 5070 Frick, Switzerland
    Research Institute for Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 60486 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Mia Schoeber

    (Research Institute for Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 60486 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Irfan Gültekin

    (Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Center, 42020 Konya, Türkiye)

  • Tae Hoon Kim

    (Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada)

  • Alexander Heer

    (Research Institute for Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 5070 Frick, Switzerland)

  • Fevzi Partigöç

    (Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Center, 42020 Konya, Türkiye)

  • Rifat Zafer Arısoy

    (Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Center, 42020 Konya, Türkiye)

  • Şeref Aksoyak

    (Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Center, 42020 Konya, Türkiye)

  • Fatih Özdemir

    (Bahri Dagdas International Agricultural Research Center, 42020 Konya, Türkiye)

  • Amritbir Riar

    (Research Institute for Organic Agriculture (FiBL), 5070 Frick, Switzerland)

Abstract

Wheat productivity in dry regions of the world such as Central Asia and the Mediterranean is experiencing significant declines due to erratic weather events. Conservation agriculture (CA) has been promoted as a promising alternative for drylands to address climate-change-induced water scarcity and soil degradation. A long-term experiment in the Central Anatolian region of Türkiye compared CA and conventional tillage (CT) using diversified two- and four-year rotations. All rotations outperformed the wheat–wheat control, with the highest yields in wheat–fallow and wheat–lentil rotations. Four-year rotations generally yielded more than two-year ones under both CA and CT, except wheat–fallow and wheat–lentil, which matched four-year results. In two-year-rotations, yield differences between CA and CT were largest in wheat–wheat and wheat–lentil, with CA increasing yields by around 50% and 60% for chickpea and lentil, respectively. Chickpea and lentil also had a similar positive effect on wheat yield in four-year rotations. All rotations were more profitable under CA than CT, with chickpea and lentil rotations achieving the highest gross margin. Soil organic matter content was significantly greater under CA compared to CT within each two-year crop rotation. Our study clearly demonstrated the advantages of CA over CT in terms of production, soil quality and economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Harun Cicek & Mia Schoeber & Irfan Gültekin & Tae Hoon Kim & Alexander Heer & Fevzi Partigöç & Rifat Zafer Arısoy & Şeref Aksoyak & Fatih Özdemir & Amritbir Riar, 2025. "Superior Wheat Yield and Profitability in Conservation Agriculture with Diversified Rotations vs. Conventional Tillage in Cold Arid Climates," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1331-:d:1685003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1331/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1331/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Majid Yousefian & Feizollah Shahbazi & Kianoosh Hamidian, 2021. "Crop Yield and Physicochemical Properties of Wheat Grains as Affected by Tillage Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcin Różewicz & Jerzy Grabiński & Marta Wyzińska, 2024. "Growth Parameters, Yield and Grain Quality of Different Winter Wheat Cultivars Using Strip Tillage in Relation to the Intensity of Post-Harvest Soil Cultivation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1331-:d:1685003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.