IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3850-d527542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Design of Sydney’s Frontport Check-in System

Author

Listed:
  • Ting Liu

    (School of Management, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China
    School of Aviation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Gabriel Lodewijks

    (School of Aviation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

This paper proposed a scheme design for Sydney’s frontport check-in system, which completes check-in and baggage drop-off at Sydney’s Circular Quay, and transports the baggage to Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport by waterway, and provided a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis of Sydney’s frontport check-in system. Using the process method of quality management, the frontport check-in process was divided into three sub-processes: baggage consignment, baggage packing and transportation, and airport baggage handling. The eight key elements of each sub-process such as input, output, resources, and methods, etc. were discussed, the key factors influencing the cost of baggage transportation were analyzed, and the cost control measures such as adopting economic speed, reducing fuel consumption of the main engine, improving the ship loading rate, and raising loading and unloading efficiency were proposed. At the same time, two different types of baggage transportation ships and other parameters that affect the cost such as the number of berths, ships, lifting machineries, and the yard area were analyzed and calculated through calculation cases. This scheme is a beneficial addition to the existing in-town check-in system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ting Liu & Gabriel Lodewijks, 2021. "A New Design of Sydney’s Frontport Check-in System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3850-:d:527542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3850/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3850/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W.F. Lythgoe & M. Wardman, 2002. "Demand for rail travel to and from airports," Transportation, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 125-143, May.
    2. Chiambaretto, Paul & Baudelaire, Clément & Lavril, Thibaut, 2013. "Measuring the willingness-to-pay of air-rail intermodal passengers," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 50-54.
    3. Zanin, Massimiliano & Herranz, Ricardo & Ladousse, Sophie, 2012. "Environmental benefits of air–rail intermodality: The example of Madrid Barajas," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1056-1063.
    4. Vespermann, Jan & Wald, Andreas, 2011. "Intermodal integration in air transportation: status quo, motives and future developments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1187-1197.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan, Yalong & Yang, Min & Feng, Tao & Rasouli, Soora & Li, Dawei & Ruan, Xinpei, 2021. "Heterogeneity in passenger satisfaction with air-rail integration services: Results of a finite mixture partial least squares model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 133-158.
    2. Li, Zhi-Chun & Sheng, Dian, 2016. "Forecasting passenger travel demand for air and high-speed rail integration service: A case study of Beijing-Guangzhou corridor, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 397-410.
    3. Song, Fangqing & Hess, Stephane & Dekker, Thijs, 2018. "Accounting for the impact of variety-seeking: Theory and application to HSR-air intermodality in China," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 99-111.
    4. Román, Concepción & Martín, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Integration of HSR and air transport: Understanding passengers’ preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 129-141.
    5. D’Alfonso, Tiziana & Jiang, Changmin & Bracaglia, Valentina, 2016. "Air transport and high-speed rail competition: Environmental implications and mitigation strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 261-276.
    6. D’Alfonso, Tiziana & Jiang, Changmin & Bracaglia, Valentina, 2015. "Would competition between air transport and high-speed rail benefit environment and social welfare?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 118-137.
    7. Zhao, Yun & Yu, Hongbo, 2018. "A door-to-door travel time approach for evaluating modal competition of intercity travel: A focus on the proposed Dallas-Houston HSR route," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 13-22.
    8. Cordera, Rubén & Sañudo, Roberto & dell’Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Ángel, 2018. "Trip distribution model for regional railway services considering spatial effects between stations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 77-84.
    9. Pedro Plasencia-Lozano, 2021. "An Ex Ante Analysis of the Planned Transportation Network in the Region of Extremadura (Spain) by Using Physical Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, May.
    10. Castillo-Manzano, José I. & Pozo-Barajas, Rafael & Trapero, Juan R., 2015. "Measuring the substitution effects between High Speed Rail and air transport in Spain," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 59-65.
    11. Makoto Tsukai & Makoto Okumura, 2005. "Spatial externality of railway service improvement - To understand the Japanese inter-regional transportation service improvements," ERSA conference papers ersa05p416, European Regional Science Association.
    12. Ison, Stephen & Merkert, Rico & Mulley, Corinne, 2014. "Policy approaches to public transport at airports—Some diverging evidence from the UK and Australia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 265-274.
    13. Jenny Trinh & Fumi Harahap & Anton Fagerström & Julia Hansson, 2021. "What Are the Policy Impacts on Renewable Jet Fuel in Sweden?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-30, November.
    14. Vespermann, Jan & Wald, Andreas, 2011. "Intermodal integration in air transportation: status quo, motives and future developments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1187-1197.
    15. Alessandro Avenali & Tiziana D'Alfonso & Alberto Nastasi & Pierfrancesco Reverberi, 2019. "High-speed rail and air transport integration in hub-and-spoke networks. The role of airports," DIAG Technical Reports 2019-09, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    16. Danica Babić & Milica Kalić & Milan Janić & Slavica Dožić & Katarina Kukić, 2022. "Integrated Door-to-Door Transport Services for Air Passengers: From Intermodality to Multimodality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Roberto F. Abenoza & Oded Cats & Yusak O. Susilo, 2019. "How does travel satisfaction sum up? An exploratory analysis in decomposing the door-to-door experience for multimodal trips," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1615-1642, October.
    18. Kuo, Chung-Wei & Jou, Rong-Chang, 2018. "Air passengers’ willingness to pay for counter check-in services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 203-215.
    19. Jingjing Hao & Ling Zhang & Xiaofeng Ji & Xiaolong Wu & Lan Liu, 2020. "Investigating the Accessibility between Civil Airports and Tourist Locations in Tourist Cities in Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Shiftan, Yoram & Outwater, Maren L. & Zhou, Yushuang, 2008. "Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 186-195, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3850-:d:527542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.