IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i7p3793-d526266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yield and Cost Effects of Plot-Level Wheat Seed Rates and Seed Recycling Practices in the East Gojam Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Application of the Dose–Response Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yirgalem Eshete

    (College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos P.O. Box 269, Ethiopia)

  • Bamlaku Alamirew

    (Yom Institute of Economic Development, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 62539, Ethiopia)

  • Zewdie Bishaw

    (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Addis Ababa P.O. Box 5689, Ethiopia)

Abstract

Previous studies investigated the effects of seed rates and seed recycling practices on the yield and yield-related variables. However, higher yield does not always guarantee cost-efficiency. This study aimed to investigate the yield effects of plot-level seed rate and the cost–benefit analysis of seed recycling practices. This study has introduced the dose–response model to the existing analytical methods used in analyzing the effect of different agrochemicals on crop yield. A multi-stage stratified sampling technique was used to select a total of 450 sample respondents. Data were gathered using a mix of data collection tools. Descriptive statistics along with the dose–response model were applied for data analysis. Farmers of the study were found to be dissimilar in terms of their seed rate application. A dose–response analysis indicated that the highest average wheat yield was associated with a seed rate of 50 kg ha −1 above what is recommended. The yield effect of seed recycling was also assessed, and a one-time seed recycling has caused a yield decline of 665 kg ha −1 compared to the non-recycled seeds. The cost reduced using recycled seed is by far lower than the economic gains associated with using unrecycled and fresh seeds. The cost–benefit analysis made clear that farmers can reduce their seed costs through seed recycling, but their yields and net income can be best improved by using unrecycled certified bread wheat seed (CBWS). Thus, farmers must be encouraged to use unrecycled seed by establishing agricultural credit schemes geared towards seed procurement and seed price subsidy as key strategies to reduce economically wasteful seed recycling practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Yirgalem Eshete & Bamlaku Alamirew & Zewdie Bishaw, 2021. "Yield and Cost Effects of Plot-Level Wheat Seed Rates and Seed Recycling Practices in the East Gojam Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Application of the Dose–Response Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3793-:d:526266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/7/3793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gashaw Tadesse Abate & Tanguy Bernard & Alan de Brauw & Nicholas Minot, 2018. "The impact of the use of new technologies on farmers’ wheat yield in Ethiopia: evidence from a randomized control trial," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(4), pages 409-421, July.
    2. Krishna, Vijesh V. & Spielman, David J. & Veettil, Prakashan C. & Ghimire, Subash, 2014. "An empirical examination of the dynamics of varietal turnover in Indian wheat:," IFPRI discussion papers 1336, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Christian Ritz & Florent Baty & Jens C Streibig & Daniel Gerhard, 2015. "Dose-Response Analysis Using R," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abyiot Teklu & Belay Simane & Mintewab Bezabih, 2022. "Effectiveness of Climate-Smart Agriculture Innovations in Smallholder Agriculture System in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natasja Krog Noer & Majken Pagter & Simon Bahrndorff & Anders Malmendal & Torsten Nygaard Kristensen, 2020. "Impacts of thermal fluctuations on heat tolerance and its metabolomic basis in Arabidopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster, and Orchesella cincta," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Khushbu Mishra & Abdoul G. Sam & Gracious M. Diiro & Mario J. Miranda, 2020. "Gender and the dynamics of technology adoption: Empirical evidence from a household‐level panel data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 857-870, November.
    3. G.T. Abate & Tanguy Bernard & Simrin Makhija & David J. Spielman, 2019. "Accelerating technical change through video-mediated agricultural extension: Evidence from Ethiopia," Working Papers hal-02879823, HAL.
    4. Pâmela Carvalho-Moore & Gulab Rangani & James Heiser & Douglas Findley & Steven J. Bowe & Nilda Roma-Burgos, 2021. "PPO2 Mutations in Amaranthus palmeri : Implications on Cross-Resistance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Michael Bernardi & Christa Hainz & Paulina Maier & Maria Waldinger, 2023. "A “Green Revolution” for Sub-Saharan Africa? Challenges and Opportunities," EconPol Policy Brief 54, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    6. Milan Brankov & Bruno Canella Vieira & Miloš Rajković & Milena Simić & Jelena Vukadinović & Violeta Mandić & Vesna Dragičević, 2023. "Herbicide drift vs. crop resilience - the influence of micro-rates," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(4), pages 161-169.
    7. Cordonnier, Victor & Covarrubias, Katia Alejandra & de la O Campos, Ana Paula, 2022. "Agricultural interventions and food security in Ethiopia – What is the role of adjusting livelihood strategies?," ESA Working Papers 330797, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    8. Wang, Huaiyu & Bin, Bing & Pede, Valerien O., 2023. "Adoption of ratoon rice and its impact on technical efficiency of rice farming in China," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335541, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Michael Carter & Rachid Laajaj & Dean Yang, 2021. "Subsidies and the African Green Revolution: Direct Effects and Social Network Spillovers of Randomized Input Subsidies in Mozambique," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(2), pages 206-229, April.
    10. Abate, Gashaw T. & Bernard, Tanguy & Makhija, Simrin & Spielman, David J., 2023. "Accelerating technical change through ICT: Evidence from a video-mediated extension experiment in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    11. ELOUHICHI Kamel & TEMURSHOEV Umed & COLEN Liesbeth & GOMEZ Y PALOMA Sergio, 2019. "Upscaling the productivity performance of the Agricultural Commercialization Cluster Initiative in Ethiopia," JRC Research Reports JRC117562, Joint Research Centre.
    12. David Alfaro‐Serrano & Tanay Balantrapu & Ritam Chaurey & Ana Goicoechea & Eric Verhoogen, 2021. "Interventions to promote technology adoption in firms: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    13. Jourdain C. Lokossou & Hippolyte D. Affognon & Alphonse Singbo & Michel B. Vabi & Ayoni Ogunbayo & Paul Tanzubil & Alcade C. Segnon & Geoffrey Muricho & Haile Desmae & Hakeem Ajeigbe, 2022. "Welfare impacts of improved groundnut varieties adoption and food security implications in the semi-arid areas of West Africa," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(3), pages 709-728, June.
    14. Asresu Yitayew & Awudu Abdulai & Yigezu A Yigezu, 2022. "Improved agricultural input delivery systems for enhancing technology adoption: evidence from a field experiment in Ethiopia," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(3), pages 527-556.
    15. Min Pan & William C. Wright & Richard H. Chapple & Asif Zubair & Manbir Sandhu & Jake E. Batchelder & Brandt C. Huddle & Jonathan Low & Kaley B. Blankenship & Yingzhe Wang & Brittney Gordon & Payton A, 2021. "The chemotherapeutic CX-5461 primarily targets TOP2B and exhibits selective activity in high-risk neuroblastoma," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Hyeong-Min Lee & William C. Wright & Min Pan & Jonathan Low & Duane Currier & Jie Fang & Shivendra Singh & Stephanie Nance & Ian Delahunty & Yuna Kim & Richard H. Chapple & Yinwen Zhang & Xueying Liu , 2023. "A CRISPR-drug perturbational map for identifying compounds to combine with commonly used chemotherapeutics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Tea Pemovska & Johannes W. Bigenzahn & Ismet Srndic & Alexander Lercher & Andreas Bergthaler & Adrián César-Razquin & Felix Kartnig & Christoph Kornauth & Peter Valent & Philipp B. Staber & Giulio Sup, 2021. "Metabolic drug survey highlights cancer cell dependencies and vulnerabilities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Amany S. Ibrahim & Gomaa A. M. Ali & Amro Hassanein & Ahmed M. Attia & Ezzat R. Marzouk, 2022. "Toxicity and Uptake of CuO Nanoparticles: Evaluation of an Emerging Nanofertilizer on Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Plant," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Alan Gelb & Vijaya Ramachandran & Christian J. Meyer & Divyanshi Wadhwa & Kyle Navis, 2020. "Can Sub-Saharan Africa Be a Manufacturing Destination? Labor Costs, Price Levels, and the Role of Industrial Policy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 335-357, June.
    20. Traxler, Emilia & Li, Tongzhe, 2020. "Agricultural Best Management Practices, A summary of adoption behaviour," Working Papers 305271, University of Guelph, Institute for the Advanced Study of Food and Agricultural Policy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:3793-:d:526266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.