IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p2051-d499282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Twin Aided Vulnerability Assessment and Risk-Based Maintenance Planning of Bridge Infrastructures Exposed to Extreme Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Sakdirat Kaewunruen

    (School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

  • Jessada Sresakoolchai

    (School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

  • Wentao Ma

    (School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK)

  • Olisa Phil-Ebosie

    (Transport for London (TfL), 5 Endeavour Square, London E20 1JN, UK)

Abstract

Over the past centuries, millions of bridge infrastructures have been constructed globally. Many of those bridges are ageing and exhibit significant potential risks. Frequent risk-based inspection and maintenance management of highway bridges is particularly essential for public safety. At present, most bridges rely on manual inspection methods for management. The efficiency is extremely low, causing the risk of bridge deterioration and defects to increase day by day, reducing the load-bearing capacity of bridges, and restricting the normal and safe use of them. At present, the applications of digital twins in the construction industry have gained significant momentum and the industry has gradually entered the information age. In order to obtain and share relevant information, engineers and decision makers have adopted digital twins over the entire life cycle of a project, but their applications are still limited to data sharing and visualization. This study has further demonstrated the unprecedented applications of digital twins to sustainability and vulnerability assessments, which can enable the next generation risk-based inspection and maintenance framework. This study adopts the data obtained from a constructor of Zhongcheng Village Bridge in Zhejiang Province, China as a case study. The applications of digital twins to bridge model establishment, information collection and sharing, data processing, inspection and maintenance planning have been highlighted. Then, the integration of “digital twins (or Building Information Modelling, BIM) + bridge risk inspection model” has been established, which will become a more effective information platform for all stakeholders to mitigate risks and uncertainties of exposure to extreme weather conditions over the entire life cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Wentao Ma & Olisa Phil-Ebosie, 2021. "Digital Twin Aided Vulnerability Assessment and Risk-Based Maintenance Planning of Bridge Infrastructures Exposed to Extreme Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2051-:d:499282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2051/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/2051/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Shijie Peng & Olisa Phil-Ebosie, 2020. "Digital Twin Aided Sustainability and Vulnerability Audit for Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Zhihao Zhou, 2020. "Sustainability-Based Lifecycle Management for Bridge Infrastructure Using 6D BIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Junying Peng, 2019. "Life Cycle Cost, Energy and Carbon Assessments of Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Lalida Kerinnonta, 2019. "Potential Reconstruction Design of an Existing Townhouse in Washington DC for Approaching Net Zero Energy Building Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Panrawee Rungskunroch & Joshua Welsh, 2018. "A Digital-Twin Evaluation of Net Zero Energy Building for Existing Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Klaus Eisenack & Rebecca Stecker, 2012. "A framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 243-260, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viktor Rjabtšikov & Anton Rassõlkin & Karolina Kudelina & Ants Kallaste & Toomas Vaimann, 2023. "Review of Electric Vehicle Testing Procedures for Digital Twin Development: A Comprehensive Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyung-Hwan Ji & Hyun-Kook Shin & Seungwoo Han & Jae-Hun Jo, 2020. "A Statistical Approach for Predicting Airtightness in Residential Units of Reinforced Concrete Apartment Buildings in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Fang, Zigeng & Yan, Jiayi & Lu, Qiuchen & Chen, Long & Yang, Pu & Tang, Junqing & Jiang, Feng & Broyd, Tim & Hong, Jingke, 2023. "A systematic literature review of carbon footprint decision-making approaches for infrastructure and building projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    3. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Shijie Peng & Olisa Phil-Ebosie, 2020. "Digital Twin Aided Sustainability and Vulnerability Audit for Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Antonio Ledda & Elisabetta Anna Di Cesare & Giovanni Satta & Gianluca Cocco & Giovanna Calia & Filippo Arras & Annalisa Congiu & Emanuela Manca & Andrea De Montis, 2020. "Adaptation to Climate Change and Regional Planning: A Scrutiny of Sectoral Instruments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Lena I. Fuldauer & Scott Thacker & Robyn A. Haggis & Francesco Fuso-Nerini & Robert J. Nicholls & Jim W. Hall, 2022. "Targeting climate adaptation to safeguard and advance the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Agnieszka Leśniak & Monika Górka & Izabela Skrzypczak, 2021. "Barriers to BIM Implementation in Architecture, Construction, and Engineering Projects—The Polish Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Cavalcante, Ana Helena A. P., 2015. "Barriers and opportunities for climate adaptation: The water crisis in Greater São Paulo," The Constitutional Economics Network Working Papers 04-2015, University of Freiburg, Department of Economic Policy and Constitutional Economic Theory.
    8. Sakdirat Kaewunruen & Jessada Sresakoolchai & Zhihao Zhou, 2020. "Sustainability-Based Lifecycle Management for Bridge Infrastructure Using 6D BIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Ágota Bányai & Tamás Bányai, 2022. "Real-Time Maintenance Policy Optimization in Manufacturing Systems: An Energy Efficiency and Emission-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Antonio Ledda & Marta Kubacka & Giovanna Calia & Sylwia Bródka & Vittorio Serra & Andrea De Montis, 2023. "Italy vs. Poland: A Comparative Analysis of Regional Planning System Attitudes toward Adaptation to Climate Changes and Green Infrastructures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. Chandni Singh & James Ford & Debora Ley & Amir Bazaz & Aromar Revi, 2020. "Assessing the feasibility of adaptation options: methodological advancements and directions for climate adaptation research and practice," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 255-277, September.
    12. Ahmad Jrade & Farnaz Jalaei & Jieying Jane Zhang & Saeed Jalilzadeh Eirdmousa & Farzad Jalaei, 2023. "Potential Integration of Bridge Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment/Life Cycle Costing Tools for Infrastructure Projects within Construction 4.0: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori & Idris Othman & Al-Hussein M. H. Al-Aidrous, 2022. "“Values, Challenges, and Critical Success Factors” of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Malaysia: Experts Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Juan Francisco Fernández Rodríguez, 2023. "Sustainable Design Protocol in BIM Environments: Case Study of 3D Virtual Models of a Building in Seville (Spain) Based on BREEAM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-29, March.
    15. Hossein Omrany & Karam M. Al-Obaidi & Amreen Husain & Amirhosein Ghaffarianhoseini, 2023. "Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Klaus Eisenack, 2014. "The Inefficiency of Private Adaptation to Pollution in the Presence of Endogenous Market Structure," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 57(1), pages 81-99, January.
    17. Klaus Eisenack & Rebecca Stecker & Diana Reckien & Esther Hoffmann, 2012. "Adaptation to climate change in the transport sector: a review of actions and actors," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 451-469, June.
    18. Gawel, Erik & Heuson, Clemens & Lehmann, Paul, 2012. "Efficient public adaptation to climate change: An investigation of drivers and barriers from a Public Choice perspective," UFZ Discussion Papers 14/2012, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    19. Paul Watkiss, 2015. "A review of the economics of adaptation and climate-resilient development," GRI Working Papers 205, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    20. James Ford & Diana King, 2015. "A framework for examining adaptation readiness," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 505-526, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:2051-:d:499282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.