IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1805-d495255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Grey Multi-Level Evaluation of Industrial Park Ecology Based on a Coefficient of Variation-Attribute Hierarchy Model

Author

Listed:
  • Baolin Qiu

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    China Business Executives Academy, Dalian 116086, China)

  • Dongkun Luo

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

China entered a new era, and the construction of an ecological civilization and green development has been raised to a new strategic height. As the lifeblood of the national economy, industrial parks significantly contribute to economic growth. However, they also generate significant pollution, damaging the ecological environment. It is urgent to ecologically transform traditional industrial parks. This requires identifying methods to correctly and objectively evaluate the ecological level of industrial parks, and provide ecological construction proposals for the government and industrial parks. In this study, the comprehensive evaluation weight was determined by introducing a variation coefficient and an Attribute Hierarchy Model (AHM). The ecological level of four representative eco-industrial parks was then quantitatively evaluated using a grey multi-level evaluation method. The ecological construction level of the four industrial parks was as follows. The Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area (TEDA) was rated at a “very good” level; and the Suzhou industrial park, Dalian economic and technological development zone, and Fushun mining group were rated at a “good” level. Six dimensions were studied. Of these, policy management had the highest weight, and the total weight of policy management and economic development approached 50%. The result shows that industrial parks can attract innovative enterprises and talents through the policy guidance of local government to improve the level of green innovation technology and cleaner production technology. Then, the ecological level of the industrial parks will be improved. This study enriched the theory and practice of ecological evaluation of industrial parks and provided a reference for the ecological construction of traditional industrial parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Baolin Qiu & Dongkun Luo, 2021. "A Grey Multi-Level Evaluation of Industrial Park Ecology Based on a Coefficient of Variation-Attribute Hierarchy Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1805-:d:495255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1805/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1805/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sara Tessitore & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2015. "Eco-Industrial Parks Development and Integrated Management Challenges: Findings from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Wei Wang & Yi He & Deyuan Zhang & Yufeng Wu & Dean Pan, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Best Available Treatment Technology for Waste Lead-Acid Battery: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Ruiyan Wang & Simon Huston & Yuhuan Li & Huiping Ma & Yang Peng & Lihua Ding, 2018. "Temporal Stability of Groundwater Depth in the Contemporary Yellow River Delta, Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté, 2017. "A Framework for Integrating Ecosystem Services into China’s Circular Economy: The Case of Eco-Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Lei Shi & Bing Yu, 2014. "Eco-Industrial Parks from Strategic Niches to Development Mainstream: The Cases of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-7, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vitaliy Roud & Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2018. "The Influence of State‐Ownership on Eco‐Innovations in Russian Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1213-1227, October.
    2. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté, 2017. "A Framework for Integrating Ecosystem Services into China’s Circular Economy: The Case of Eco-Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Winans, K. & Kendall, A. & Deng, H., 2017. "The history and current applications of the circular economy concept," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 825-833.
    5. Jiajia Huan & Ling Han, 2022. "Potential Contribution to Carbon Neutrality Strategy from Industrial Symbiosis: Evidence from a Local Coal-Aluminum-Electricity-Steel Industrial System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Rachelle LeBlanc & Carole Tranchant & Yves Gagnon & Raymond Côté, 2016. "Potential for Eco-Industrial Park Development in Moncton, New Brunswick (Canada): A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Donato Masi & Steven Day & Janet Godsell, 2017. "Supply Chain Configurations in the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & Carina Pimentel & João C.O. Matias, 2019. "The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis: Case Analysis and Main Drivers and Barriers to Its Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-68, December.
    9. Yuan Hu & Xuan He & Mark Poustie, 2018. "Can Legislation Promote a Circular Economy? A Material Flow-Based Evaluation of the Circular Degree of the Chinese Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Zeng, Douglas Zhihua & Cheng, Lei & Shi, Lei & Luetkenhorst, Wilfried, 2021. "China’s green transformation through eco-industrial parks," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Shimaa Al-Quradaghi & Qipeng P. Zheng & Alberto Betancourt-Torcat & Ali Elkamel, 2022. "Optimization Model for Sustainable End-of-Life Vehicle Processing and Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Aitor Salesa & Raúl León & José Mariano Moneva, 2023. "Airlines practices to incorporate circular economy principles into the waste management system," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 443-458, January.
    13. Pauline Deutz & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2015. "From Theory to Practice: Enhancing the Potential Policy Impact of Industrial Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté, 2021. "Teaching Industrial Ecology to Undergraduate Students: Lessons Learned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    15. He Yang & Dongqian Xue & Hailing Li & Xinmeng Cai & Yanyan Ma & Yongyong Song, 2023. "Interaction between the Cultural and Entertainment Industry and Urban Development in Xi’an: A Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Hyeong-Woo Kim & Liang Dong & Seok Jung & Hung-Suck Park, 2018. "The Role of the Eco-Industrial Park (EIP) at the National Economy: An Input-Output Analysis on Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Nelly Florida Riama & Riri Fitri Sari & Henita Rahmayanti & Widada Sulistya & Mohamad Husein Nurrahmat, 2021. "The Level of Public Acceptance to the Development of a Coastal Flooding Early Warning System in Jakarta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Wu, Jianxian & Nie, Xin & Wang, Han & Li, Weijuan, 2023. "Eco-industrial parks and green technological progress: Evidence from Chinese cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    19. Ionica Oncioiu & Sorinel Căpuşneanu & Mirela Cătălina Türkeș & Dan Ioan Topor & Dana-Maria Oprea Constantin & Andreea Marin-Pantelescu & Mihaela Ștefan Hint, 2018. "The Sustainability of Romanian SMEs and Their Involvement in the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Vasilis C. Kapsalis & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos & Konstantinos G. Aravossis, 2019. "Investigation of Ecosystem Services and Circular Economy Interactions under an Inter-organizational Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1805-:d:495255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.