IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i4p1751-d494628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Based Comparison of Textile Ecolabels

Author

Listed:
  • Felice Diekel

    (Department of Sustainable Engineering, Institute of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

  • Natalia Mikosch

    (Department of Sustainable Engineering, Institute of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

  • Vanessa Bach

    (Department of Sustainable Engineering, Institute of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

  • Matthias Finkbeiner

    (Department of Sustainable Engineering, Institute of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Environmental impacts of textile production increased over the last decades. This also led to an increasing demand for sustainable textiles and ecolabels, which intend to provide information on environmental aspects of textiles for the consumer. The goal of the paper is to assess selected labels with regard to their strengths and weaknesses, as well as their coverage of relevant environmental aspects over the life cycle of textiles. We applied a characterization scheme to analyse seven selected labels (Blue Angel Textiles, bluesign ® , Cotton made in Africa (CMiA), Cradle to Cradle Certified TM , Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS), Global Recycled Standard (GRS), VAUDE Green Shape), and compared their focus to the environmental hotpots identified in the product environmental footprint case study of t-shirts. Most labels focus on the environmental aspects toxicity, water use, and air emissions predominantly in the upstream life cycle phases of textiles (mainly garment production), whereas some relevant impacts and life cycle phases like water in textile use phase remain neglected. We found significant differences between the ecolabels, and none of them cover all relevant aspects and impacts over the life cycle. Consumers need to be aware of these limitations when making purchase decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Felice Diekel & Natalia Mikosch & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2021. "Life Cycle Based Comparison of Textile Ecolabels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1751-:d:494628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/4/1751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Spoor, 1998. "The Aral Sea Basin Crisis: Transition and Environment in Former Soviet Central Asia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 29(3), pages 409-435, July.
    2. João Leitão & Sónia de Brito & Serena Cubico, 2019. "Eco-Innovation Influencers: Unveiling the Role of Lean Management Principles Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Claudia E. Henninger, 2015. "Traceability the New Eco-Label in the Slow-Fashion Industry?—Consumer Perceptions and Micro-Organisations Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Nikolay Minkov & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Characterization of the Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Products Program in the Context of Eco-labels and Environmental Declarations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Guillaume Gruère, 2013. "A Characterisation of Environmental Labelling and Information Schemes," OECD Environment Working Papers 62, OECD Publishing.
    6. Vanessa Bach & Nikolay Minkov & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Assessing the Ability of the Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Products Program to Reliably Determine the Environmental Performance of Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Thorey S Thorisdottir & Lara Johannsdottir, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Influencing Sustainability within the Fashion Industry. A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-64, November.
    8. Kirsi Laitala & Ingun Grimstad Klepp & Roy Kettlewell & Stephen Wiedemann, 2020. "Laundry Care Regimes: Do the Practices of Keeping Clothes Clean Have Different Environmental Impacts Based on the Fibre Content?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    9. Massimo Battaglia & Francesco Testa & Lara Bianchi & Fabio Iraldo & Marco Frey, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitiveness within SMEs of the Fashion Industry: Evidence from Italy and France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simone Sehnem & Leonice Troiani & Ana Cláudia Lara & Marcelo Guerreiro Crizel & Luciano Carvalho & Vinícius Picanço Rodrigues, 2024. "Sustainable fashion: challenges and barriers for advancing the circular economy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 4097-4118, February.
    2. Sofia Plakantonaki & Kyriaki Kiskira & Nikolaos Zacharopoulos & Ioannis Chronis & Fernando Coelho & Amir Togiani & Konstantinos Kalkanis & Georgios Priniotakis, 2023. "A Review of Sustainability Standards and Ecolabeling in the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Davide Rovelli & Carlo Brondi & Michele Andreotti & Elisabetta Abbate & Maurizio Zanforlin & Andrea Ballarino, 2022. "A Modular Tool to Support Data Management for LCA in Industry: Methodology, Application and Potentialities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-31, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadro Dominika & Patora-Wysocka Zofia & Fijałkowska Justyna & Mróz-Gorgoń Barbara, 2023. "Sustainability and Fast Fashion from the Executive Perspective – the Case of LPP S.A," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(3), pages 148-178, September.
    2. Olusola Joshua Olujobi & Daniel E. Ufua & Uchechukwu Emena Okorie & Mercy E. Ogbari, 2022. "Carbon emission, solid waste management, and electricity generation: a legal and empirical perspective for renewable energy in Nigeria," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 599-619, September.
    3. Ciambellini, Giulia & D'Adamo, Idiano & Gastaldi, Massimo & Smol, Marzena, 2025. "Sustainability and competitiveness: Economic analysis of a photovoltaic plant with storage in an Italian textile company," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2).
    4. Xiaochen Zhang & Xinyu Liu & Yang Zhang & Xing Xu & Jiaxin Xiao & Ding-Bang Luh, 2023. "Assessing the Feasibility of Practical Cradle to Cradle in Sustainable Conceptual Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Wadhah Alzahmi & Karam Al-Assaf & Ryan Alshaikh & Israa Al Khaffaf & Malick Ndiaye, 2025. "Strategic Business Model Development for Sustainable Fashion Startups: Insights from the BANU Case in Senegal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, June.
    7. repec:osf:thesis:bdumw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Wichelns, Dennis, 1999. "An economic model of waterlogging and salinization in arid regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 475-491, September.
    9. Nathalie Gröfke & Valérie Duplat & Christopher Wickert & Brian Tjemkes, 2021. "A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Food Labelling for Environmental Sustainability: Attitudes, Perceived Barriers, and Solution Approaches towards the “Traffic Light Index”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Richard Auty, 2003. "Natural resources and ‘gradual’ reform in Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 27(4), pages 255-266, November.
    11. Yao Song & Zhenzhen Qin & Zihao Qin, 2020. "Green Marketing to Gen Z Consumers in China: Examining the Mediating Factors of an Eco-Label–Informed Purchase," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    12. Agnė Jučienė & Inga Gurauskienė & Jolita Kruopienė, 2025. "Calculating the Environmental Impact Reduction Due to Extended Lifespan of Clothing Through Clothing Swaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Carmen Quiles‐Soler & Alba‐María Martínez‐Sala & Juan Monserrat‐Gauchi, 2023. "Fashion industry's environmental policy: Social media and corporate website as vehicles for communicating corporate social responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 180-191, January.
    14. Huynh Thi Thuy Giang & Luu Tien Dung, 2022. "The effect of internal corporate social responsibility practices on firm performance: the mediating role of employee intrapreneurial behaviour," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1035-1061, May.
    15. Spoor, M.N., 1999. "Agrarian transition in former Soviet Central Asia : a comparative study of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19043, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    16. Yan Zhao & Yubin Gao & Diming Hong, 2025. "Sustainable Innovation and Economic Resilience: Deciphering ESG Ratings’ Role in Lowering Debt Financing Costs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4309-4343, March.
    17. Anne Mastamet-Mason & Christina JM More, 2023. "Perceived Environmental Implications of Clothing Maintenance Among Consumers in Gauteng Province, South Africa," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, March.
    18. Feng Xiong & Yaxin Shao & Haotian Fan & Yi Xie, 2023. "Analysis of the Motivation behind Corporate Social Responsibility Based on the csQCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, July.
    19. Walid Cheffi & Ahmed Abdel-Maksoud & Muhammad Omer Farooq, 2021. "CSR initiatives, organizational performance and the mediating role of integrating CSR into management control systems: Testing an inclusive model within SMEs in an emerging economy," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 333-367, September.
    20. Bin Shen, 2014. "Sustainable Fashion Supply Chain: Lessons from H&M," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    21. Isabelle Alphonse & Claire Dupont & Ferauge Perrine & Sylvie Scoyez, 2018. "Sensitivity Of Directors To Workplace Wellbeing And Risk Management: Evidence From Small And Medium Enterprises In Belgium," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(1), pages 79-92.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1751-:d:494628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.