IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1458-d490162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritization in Strategic Environmental Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method with Random Generation for Absent Information in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Daeryong Park

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

  • Huan-Jung Fan

    (Department of Safety, Health and Environmental Engineering, Hungkuang University, Taichung 43302, Taiwan)

  • Jun-Jie Zhu

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA)

  • Taesoon Kim

    (Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. Ltd., Chuncheon 24202, Korea)

  • Myoung-Jin Um

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Korea)

  • Siyeon Kim

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

  • Seol Jeon

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

  • Kichul Jung

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea)

Abstract

This study evaluated a fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) as a multicriteria decision making system that compensates for missing information with undefined weight factor criteria. The suggested Fuzzy TOPSIS was applied to ten potential dam sites in three river basins (the Han River, the Geum River, and the Nakdong River basins) in South Korea. To assess potential dam sites, the strategic environment assessment (SEA) monitored four categories: national preservation, endangered species, water quality, and toxic environment. To consider missing information, this study applied the Monte Carlo Simulation method with uniform and normal distributions. The results show that effects of missing information generation with one fuzzy set in GB1 site of the Geum River basin are not great in fuzzy positive-ideal solution (FPIS) and fuzzy negative-ideal solution (FNIS) estimations. However, the combination of two fuzzy sets considering missing information in Gohyun stream (NG) and Hoenggye stream (NH) sites of the Nakdong River basin has a great effect on estimating FPIS, FNIS, and priority ranking in Fuzzy TOPSIS applications. The sites with the highest priority ranking in the Han River, Geum River, and Nakdong River basins based on Fuzzy TOPSIS are the Dal stream 1 (HD1), Bocheong stream 2 (GB2) and NG sites. Among the sites in all river basins, the GB2 site had the highest priority ranking. Consequently, the results coincided with findings of previous studies based on multicriteria decision making with missing information and show the applicability of Fuzzy TOPSIS when evaluating priority rankings in cases with missing information.

Suggested Citation

  • Daeryong Park & Huan-Jung Fan & Jun-Jie Zhu & Taesoon Kim & Myoung-Jin Um & Siyeon Kim & Seol Jeon & Kichul Jung, 2021. "Prioritization in Strategic Environmental Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method with Random Generation for Absent Information in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1458-:d:490162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. U. Pascal Onu & Quan Xie & Ling Xu, 2017. "A Fuzzy TOPSIS model Framework for Ranking Sustainable Water Supply Alternatives," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2579-2593, July.
    2. M. Islam & Rehan Sadiq & Manuel Rodriguez & Homayoun Najjaran & Alex Francisque & Mina Hoorfar, 2013. "Evaluating Water Quality Failure Potential in Water Distribution Systems: A Fuzzy-TOPSIS-OWA-based Methodology," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(7), pages 2195-2216, May.
    3. Kwangjai Won & Eun-Sung Chung & Sung-Uk Choi, 2015. "Parametric Assessment of Water Use Vulnerability Variations Using SWAT and Fuzzy TOPSIS Coupled with Entropy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Daeryong Park & Myoung-Jin Um, 2018. "Robust Decision-Making Technique for Strategic Environment Assessment with Deficient Information," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(15), pages 4953-4970, December.
    5. Amir Noori & Hossein Bonakdari & Khosro Morovati & Bahram Gharabaghi, 2018. "The optimal dam site selection using a group decision-making method through fuzzy TOPSIS model," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 471-488, December.
    6. Daeryong Park & Yeonjoo Kim & Myoung-Jin Um & Sung-Uk Choi, 2015. "Robust Priority for Strategic Environmental Assessment with Incomplete Information Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Elleuch, Mohamed Ali & Anane, Makram & Euchi, Jalel & Frikha, Ahmed, 2019. "Hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making to solve the irrigation water allocation problem in the Tunisian case," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Amin Afshar & Miguel Mariño & Motahareh Saadatpour & Abbas Afshar, 2011. "Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(2), pages 545-563, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin-Yu Wan & Ping-An Zhong & Emmanuel Appiah-Adjei, 2014. "Variable Sets and Fuzzy Rating Interval for Water Allocation Options Assessment," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(10), pages 2833-2849, August.
    2. Kaveh Madani & Laura Read & Laleh Shalikarian, 2014. "Voting Under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Framework for Analyzing Group Decision Making Problems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(7), pages 1839-1856, May.
    3. Tang, Kayu & Parsons, David J. & Jude, Simon, 2019. "Comparison of automatic and guided learning for Bayesian networks to analyse pipe failures in the water distribution system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 24-36.
    4. Ahamd Radmehr & Shahab Araghinejad, 2015. "Flood Vulnerability Analysis by Fuzzy Spatial Multi Criteria Decision Making," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(12), pages 4427-4445, September.
    5. Noori, Amir & Bonakdari, Hossein & Salimi, Amir Hossein & Gharabaghi, Bahram, 2021. "A group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method for water supply choice optimization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Karner, Katrin & Schmid, Erwin & Schneider, Uwe A. & Mitter, Hermine, 2021. "Computing stochastic Pareto frontiers between economic and environmental goals for a semi-arid agricultural production region in Austria," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Huiru Zhao & Nana Li, 2016. "Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Zhang, Xianbo & Yang, Hui & Du, Taisheng, 2025. "Study of regulated deficit irrigation regime based on individual fruit weight and quality response to water deficit duration: A case study in tomato," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    9. Christopher Schulz & Julia Martin-Ortega & Klaus Glenk, 2019. "Understanding Public Views on a Dam Construction Boom: the Role of Values," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(14), pages 4687-4700, November.
    10. Reza Zamani & Ali Mohammad Akhond Ali & Abbas Roozbahani, 2020. "Evaluation of Adaptation Scenarios for Climate Change Impacts on Agricultural Water Allocation Using Fuzzy MCDM Methods," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(3), pages 1093-1110, February.
    11. Fausto Cavallaro & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Saulius Raslanas, 2016. "Evaluation of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems Using Fuzzy Shannon Entropy and Fuzzy TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Georgios K. Koulinas & Olympia E. Demesouka & Konstantinos A. Sidas & Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis, 2021. "A TOPSIS—Risk Matrix and Monte Carlo Expert System for Risk Assessment in Engineering Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Z. Ghaffari Moghadam & E. Moradi & M. Hashemi Tabar & A. Sardar Shahraki, 2023. "Developing a Bi-level programming model for water allocation based on Nerlove’s supply response theory and water market," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5663-5689, June.
    14. Kwangjai Won & Eun-Sung Chung & Sung-Uk Choi, 2015. "Parametric Assessment of Water Use Vulnerability Variations Using SWAT and Fuzzy TOPSIS Coupled with Entropy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Zachary A. Collier & James H. Lambert & Igor Linkov, 2018. "Systems modeling techniques for data analysis, decision making, and risk governance," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 431-432, December.
    16. Jitendra Rajput & Man Singh & Khajanchi Lal & Manoj Khanna & Arjamadutta Sarangi & Joydeep Mukherjee & Shrawan Singh, 2024. "Selection of alternate reference evapotranspiration models based on multi-criteria decision ranking for semiarid climate," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 11171-11216, May.
    17. Chengpeng Lu & Bing Xue & Chenyu Lu & Ting Wang & Lu Jiang & Zilong Zhang & Wanxia Ren, 2016. "Sustainability Investigation of Resource-Based Cities in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Kobryń Andrzej & Prystrom Joanna, 2016. "A Data Pre-Processing Model for the Topsis Method," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 219-235, December.
    19. Wang, Bing & Nistor, Ioan & Murty, Tad & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2014. "Efficiency assessment of hydroelectric power plants in Canada: A multi criteria decision making approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 112-121.
    20. Jiashun Huang & Weiping Li & Xijie Huang & Lijia Guo, 2017. "Analysis of the Relative Sustainability of Land Devoted to Bioenergy: Comparing Land-Use Alternatives in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1458-:d:490162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.