IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i9p12052-12070d55097.html

Parametric Assessment of Water Use Vulnerability Variations Using SWAT and Fuzzy TOPSIS Coupled with Entropy

Author

Listed:
  • Kwangjai Won

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, Korea)

  • Eun-Sung Chung

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, Korea)

  • Sung-Uk Choi

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-749, Korea)

Abstract

This study assessed the water use vulnerability to include the uncertainty of the weighting values of evaluation criteria and the annual variations of performance values using fuzzy TOPSIS coupled with the Shannon entropy method. This procedure was applied to 12 major basins covering about 88% territory of South Korea. Hydrological components were simulated using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) of which parameters were optimally calibrated using SWAT-CUP model. The 15 indicators including hydrological and anthropogenic factors were selected, based on three aspects of climate exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Their weighting values were objectively quantified using the Entropy method. All performance values of 12 basins obtained from statistic Korea and SWAT simulation were normalized with the consideration of the annual variations from 1991 to 2014 using triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs). Then, Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) technique was used to quantify the water use vulnerability and rank 12 basins as follows: A12 (Hyeongsan River) > A6 (Seomjin River) > A5 (Youngsan River) > A8 (Mangyung River) > A2 (Ansung River) > A9 (Dongjin River) > A10 (Nakdong River) > A3 (Geum River) > A4 (Sapgyo River) > A11 (Taehwa River) > A7 (Tamjin River) > A1 (Han River). This framework can be used to determine the spatial priority for sustainable water resources plan and applied to derive the climate change vulnerability on sustainable water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwangjai Won & Eun-Sung Chung & Sung-Uk Choi, 2015. "Parametric Assessment of Water Use Vulnerability Variations Using SWAT and Fuzzy TOPSIS Coupled with Entropy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:9:p:12052-12070:d:55097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/9/12052/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/9/12052/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amin Afshar & Miguel Mariño & Motahareh Saadatpour & Abbas Afshar, 2011. "Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(2), pages 545-563, January.
    2. Eun-Sung Chung & Kil Lee, 2009. "Identification of Spatial Ranking of Hydrological Vulnerability Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques: Case Study of Korea," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(12), pages 2395-2416, September.
    3. Yeonjoo Kim & Eun-Sung Chung, 2013. "Assessing climate change vulnerability with group multi-criteria decision making approaches," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 301-315, November.
    4. Eun-Sung Chung & Kwangjae Won & Yeonjoo Kim & Hosun Lee, 2014. "Water Resource Vulnerability Characteristics by District’s Population Size in a Changing Climate Using Subjective and Objective Weights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sang Ug Kim & Minwoo Son & Eun-Sung Chung & Xiao Yu, 2018. "Effects of Non-Stationarity on Flood Frequency Analysis: Case Study of the Cheongmicheon Watershed in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Fuli Zhou & Yun Lin & Xu Wang & Lin Zhou & Yandong He, 2016. "ELV Recycling Service Provider Selection Using the Hybrid MCDM Method: A Case Application in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Daeryong Park & Huan-Jung Fan & Jun-Jie Zhu & Taesoon Kim & Myoung-Jin Um & Siyeon Kim & Seol Jeon & Kichul Jung, 2021. "Prioritization in Strategic Environmental Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method with Random Generation for Absent Information in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Fausto Cavallaro & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Saulius Raslanas, 2016. "Evaluation of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems Using Fuzzy Shannon Entropy and Fuzzy TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Huiru Zhao & Nana Li, 2016. "Performance Evaluation for Sustainability of Strong Smart Grid by Using Stochastic AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Jae Yeol Song & Eun-Sung Chung, 2016. "Robustness, Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of the TOPSIS Method for Quantitative Climate Change Vulnerability: a Case Study of Flood Damage," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(13), pages 4751-4771, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eun-Sung Chung & Patricia Jitta Abdulai & Hyesun Park & Yeonjoo Kim & So Ra Ahn & Seong Joon Kim, 2016. "Multi-Criteria Assessment of Spatial Robust Water Resource Vulnerability Using the TOPSIS Method Coupled with Objective and Subjective Weights in the Han River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Jae Yeol Song & Eun-Sung Chung, 2016. "Robustness, Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of the TOPSIS Method for Quantitative Climate Change Vulnerability: a Case Study of Flood Damage," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(13), pages 4751-4771, October.
    3. Aleksandras KRYLOVAS & Natalja KOSAREVA & Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS, 2016. "Statistical Analysis of KEMIRA Type Weights Balancing Methods," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 19-39, September.
    4. Kaveh Madani & Laura Read & Laleh Shalikarian, 2014. "Voting Under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Framework for Analyzing Group Decision Making Problems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(7), pages 1839-1856, May.
    5. Daeryong Park & Huan-Jung Fan & Jun-Jie Zhu & Taesoon Kim & Myoung-Jin Um & Siyeon Kim & Seol Jeon & Kichul Jung, 2021. "Prioritization in Strategic Environmental Assessment Using Fuzzy TOPSIS Method with Random Generation for Absent Information in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Arash Malekian & Ali Azarnivand, 2016. "Application of Integrated Shannon’s Entropy and VIKOR Techniques in Prioritization of Flood Risk in the Shemshak Watershed, Iran," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 409-425, January.
    7. Jay Simon, 2020. "Weight Approximation for Spatial Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Petros Xepapadeas & Kostas Douvis & Ioannis Kapsomenakis & Anastasios Xepapadeas & Christos Zerefos, 2024. "Assessing the Link between Wildfires, Vulnerability, and Climate Change: Insights from the Regions of Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, June.
    9. Eun-Sung Chung & Kwangjae Won & Yeonjoo Kim & Hosun Lee, 2014. "Water Resource Vulnerability Characteristics by District’s Population Size in a Changing Climate Using Subjective and Objective Weights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Chul-Hee Lim & Seung Hee Kim & Yuyoung Choi & Menas C. Kafatos & Woo-Kyun Lee, 2017. "Estimation of the Virtual Water Content of Main Crops on the Korean Peninsula Using Multiple Regional Climate Models and Evapotranspiration Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Gabriela Reis & Francisco Assis Souza Filho & Donald Robert Nelson & Renan Vieira Rocha & Samiria Maria Oliveira Silva, 2020. "Development of a drought vulnerability index using MCDM and GIS: study case in São Paulo and Ceará, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1781-1799, November.
    12. Min Zhou & Liu Yang & Dan Ye, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variation of Rural Vulnerability and Its Clustering Model in Guizhou Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    13. Jitendra Rajput & Man Singh & Khajanchi Lal & Manoj Khanna & Arjamadutta Sarangi & Joydeep Mukherjee & Shrawan Singh, 2024. "Selection of alternate reference evapotranspiration models based on multi-criteria decision ranking for semiarid climate," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 11171-11216, May.
    14. Cheng He & Liguo Zhou & Weichun Ma & Yuan Wang, 2019. "Spatial Assessment of Urban Climate Change Vulnerability during Different Urbanization Phases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. repec:zib:zjmerd:2jmerd2018-87-91 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Kobryń Andrzej & Prystrom Joanna, 2016. "A Data Pre-Processing Model for the Topsis Method," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 219-235, December.
    17. Wang, Bing & Nistor, Ioan & Murty, Tad & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2014. "Efficiency assessment of hydroelectric power plants in Canada: A multi criteria decision making approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 112-121.
    18. Chinh Luu & Hieu Xuan Tran & Binh Thai Pham & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Thai Quoc Tran & Nga Quynh Duong & Nam Hai Dao & Lam Phuong Nguyen & Huu Duy Nguyen & Huong Thu Ta & Hiep Van Le & Jason von Meding, 2020. "Framework of Spatial Flood Risk Assessment for a Case Study in Quang Binh Province, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Chang-Yu Hong & Eun-Sung Chung, 2016. "Temporal Variations of Citizens’ Demands on Flood Damage Mitigation, Streamflow Quantity and Quality in the Korean Urban Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Alexei Manso Correa Machado & Petr Iakovlevitch Ekel & Matheus Pereira Libório, 2023. "Goal-based participatory weighting scheme: balancing objectivity and subjectivity in the construction of composite indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4387-4407, October.
    21. S. Toosi & J. Samani, 2012. "Evaluating Water Transfer Projects Using Analytic Network Process (ANP)," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(7), pages 1999-2014, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:9:p:12052-12070:d:55097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.