IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i3p1016-d483368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traffic Simulation Analysis of Bicycle Highways in Urban Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Grigoropoulos

    (Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control; TUM Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering; Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Seyed Abdollah Hosseini

    (Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control; TUM Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering; Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany
    INVER-Ingenieurbüro für Verkehrsanlagen GmbH, 99084 Erfurt, Germany)

  • Andreas Keler

    (Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control; TUM Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering; Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Heather Kaths

    (Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control; TUM Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering; Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Matthias Spangler

    (Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control; TUM Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering; Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Fritz Busch

    (Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control; TUM Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering; Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

  • Klaus Bogenberger

    (Chair of Traffic Engineering and Control; TUM Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering; Technical University of Munich (TUM), 80333 Munich, Germany)

Abstract

The ongoing increase of bicycle traffic in urban areas forces transport authorities to reconsider the space allocation for different transport modes. Transport policies favor the introduction of high-quality bicycle infrastructure along urban corridors to improve the traffic quality and safety for bicyclists but more importantly to increase the attractiveness of bicycling and over vehicular modes. Especially in urban areas with an already established high and steadily increasing share of bicyclists, the introduction of bicycle highways is considered to further alleviate saturated interurban public transport and motor vehicle connections and increase the average traveled distance by non-motorized modes. Due to the expensive implementation costs and the space restrictions in already built-up urban environments, there should be an extensive planning phase for defining the expected changes in traffic efficiency and safety. However, the effects of urban bicycle highways on traffic performance metrics of bicyclists as well as other road users are not thoroughly studied. This paper aims to quantify and assess the potential effects of urban bicycle highway on road users. The study considers a possible inner-city pilot route in the city of Munich, where the present bicycle infrastructure is planned to be upgraded to a bicycle highway. A simulation model is designed using traffic data from field observations and future estimates for the traffic composition. Through microscopic traffic simulation, the potential effects of the introduced infrastructure on road users are determined for different study scenarios. Results show that traffic quality thresholds for bicycle highways, as defined in official guidelines, can only be fulfilled through the implementation of special bicycle traffic control measures such as bicycle coordination or bicycle passage time extension. Finally, unidirectional bicycle highways together with bicycle passage time extension provided the best overall traffic performance for bicycle traffic and motor vehicle traffic.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Grigoropoulos & Seyed Abdollah Hosseini & Andreas Keler & Heather Kaths & Matthias Spangler & Fritz Busch & Klaus Bogenberger, 2021. "Traffic Simulation Analysis of Bicycle Highways in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1016-:d:483368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1016/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1016/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Haojie & Ding, Hongliang & Ren, Gang & Xu, Chengcheng, 2018. "Effects of the London Cycle Superhighways on the usage of the London Cycle Hire," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 304-315.
    2. Elliot Fishman & Christopher Cherry, 2016. "E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 72-91, January.
    3. Agarwal, Amit & Ziemke, Dominik & Nagel, Kai, 2020. "Bicycle superhighway: An environmentally sustainable policy for urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 519-540.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piotr Kędziorek & Zbigniew Kasprzyk & Mariusz Rychlicki & Adam Rosiński, 2023. "Analysis and Evaluation of Methods Used in Measuring the Intensity of Bicycle Traffic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Heather Kaths & Andreas Keler & Klaus Bogenberger, 2021. "Calibrating the Wiedemann 99 Car-Following Model for Bicycle Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Dimitra Chondrogianni & Yorgos J. Stephanedes & Panoraia Fatourou, 2023. "Assessing Cycling Accessibility in Urban Areas through the Implementation of a New Cycling Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ziwen Ling & Christopher R. Cherry & John H. MacArthur & Jonathan X. Weinert, 2017. "Differences of Cycling Experiences and Perceptions between E-Bike and Bicycle Users in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Gu, Tianqi & Kim, Inhi & Currie, Graham, 2019. "To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 122-147.
    3. Ton, Danique & Duives, Dorine, 2021. "Understanding long-term changes in commuter mode use of a pilot featuring free e-bike trials," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 134-144.
    4. Dan Zhou & Mengying Chang & Guobin Gu & Xin Sun & Huizhi Xu & Wenhan Wang & Tao Wang, 2022. "Analysis of Risky Driving Behavior of Urban Electric Bicycle Drivers for Improving Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Li, Qiaoru & Zhang, Zhe & Li, Kun & Chen, Liang & Wei, Zhenlin & Zhang, Jingchun, 2020. "Evolutionary dynamics of traveling behavior in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    6. Li, Hongwei & Zhong, Xin & Zhang, Wenbo & Li, Sulan & Xing, Yingying, 2020. "An algorithm for e-bike equivalents at signalized intersections based on traffic conflict events number," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-95.
    7. Zhang, Ziru & Krishnakumari, Panchamy & Schulte, Frederik & van Oort, Niels, 2023. "Improving the service of E-bike sharing by demand pattern analysis: A data-driven approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Ding, Hongliang & Lu, Yuhuan & Sze, N.N. & Li, Haojie, 2022. "Effect of dockless bike-sharing scheme on the demand for London Cycle Hire at the disaggregate level using a deep learning approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 150-163.
    9. Wafa Elias & Victoria Gitelman, 2018. "Youngsters’ Opinions and Attitudes toward the Use of Electric Bicycles in Israel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Nils Hooftman & Luis Oliveira & Maarten Messagie & Thierry Coosemans & Joeri Van Mierlo, 2016. "Environmental Analysis of Petrol, Diesel and Electric Passenger Cars in a Belgian Urban Setting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Liu, Yixiao & Tian, Zihao & Pan, Baoran & Zhang, Wenbin & Liu, Yunqi & Tian, Lixin, 2022. "A hybrid big-data-based and tolerance-based method to estimate environmental benefits of electric bike sharing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    12. Umer Mansoor & Mohammad Tamim Kashifi & Fazal Rehman Safi & Syed Masiur Rahman, 2022. "A review of factors and benefits of non-motorized transport: a way forward for developing countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1560-1582, February.
    13. Oliver Schubert-Olesen & Jens Kröger & Thorsten Siegmund & Ulrike Thurm & Martin Halle, 2022. "Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Jurgis Zagorskas & Marija Burinskienė, 2019. "Challenges Caused by Increased Use of E-Powered Personal Mobility Vehicles in European Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Lorena Cadavid & Kathleen Salazar-Serna, 2021. "Mapping the Research Landscape for the Motorcycle Market Policies: Sustainability as a Trend—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Ding, Hongliang & Sze, N.N. & Li, Haojie & Guo, Yanyong, 2021. "Affected area and residual period of London Congestion Charging scheme on road safety," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 120-128.
    17. Jadwiga Biegańska & Elżbieta Grzelak-Kostulska & Michał Adam Kwiatkowski, 2021. "A Typology of Attitudes towards the E-Bike against the Background of the Traditional Bicycle and the Car," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Yang, Hongtai & Huo, Jinghai & Bao, Yongxing & Li, Xuan & Yang, Linchuan & Cherry, Christopher R., 2021. "Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 23-36.
    19. Eccarius, Timo & Leung, Abraham & Shen, Chung-Wei & Burke, Matthew & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2021. "Prospects for shared electric velomobility: Profiling potential adopters at a multi-campus university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Tao Wang & Sihong Xie & Xiaofei Ye & Xingchen Yan & Jun Chen & Wenyong Li, 2020. "Analyzing E-Bikers’ Risky Riding Behaviors, Safety Attitudes, Risk Perception, and Riding Confidence with the Structural Equation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1016-:d:483368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.