IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13802-d702040.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Media Literacy among Oil Palm Smallholders in East Malaysia and Association with Oil Palm Integration Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Hafiz Ab Rahman

    (Development Science Program, Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Kuala Lumpur 43600, Malaysia)

  • Azlina Abdullah

    (Anthropology and Sociology Program, Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environment, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Kuala Lumpur 43600, Malaysia)

  • Sivapalan Selvadurai

    (Faculty of Social Sciences and Leisure Management, School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Lakeside Campus, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya 47500, Malaysia)

  • Sharifah Zarina Syed Zakaria

    (Institute for Environment and Development (LESTARI), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Kuala Lumpur 43600, Malaysia)

  • Novel Lyndon

    (Development Science Program, Centre for Research in Development, Social and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Kuala Lumpur 43600, Malaysia)

  • Khairul Abidin

    (Malaysian Palm Oil Board, MPOB Office Miri Branch, Lot 1177 and1178, Level 4, Block 9, MLCD Miri Waterfront, Permaisuri Road, Miri 98000, Malaysia)

Abstract

With advancements in technology, social media has revolutionised the way farmers communicate, resulting in an increased level of shared agricultural knowledge. Therefore, this study investigates social media literacy among oil palm smallholders in East Malaysia and the association with oil palm integration practices. A survey of 194 respondents was conducted using a random sampling method. The survey questionnaire was adapted from several previous studies on social media literacy. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses, involving t -test, ANOVA, and logistic regression were conducted. Social media literacy was significantly higher among oil palm smallholders who were younger, with higher educational levels ( p < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that as the level of social media literacy increased, the probability for agricultural integration practices also increased (odds ratio (OR) = 1.052; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.022, 1.083). However, smallholders needed to optimise their use of social media to provide greater benefits to their agriculture. The findings of this study are useful in illustrating that interventions in social media literacy may efficiently facilitate oil palm integration. The results of this study can provide information and recommendations towards policies for the modernising of oil palm farming in Malaysia. Such studies, however, need to be further expanded by involving a larger sample of smallholders nationwide, to represent the geography of smallholders with varying levels of internet accessibility in Malaysia.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Hafiz Ab Rahman & Azlina Abdullah & Sivapalan Selvadurai & Sharifah Zarina Syed Zakaria & Novel Lyndon & Khairul Abidin, 2021. "Social Media Literacy among Oil Palm Smallholders in East Malaysia and Association with Oil Palm Integration Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13802-:d:702040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ha Van Vo & Dang Kieu Nhan & Thach Ngoc Le & Be Thanh Tran, 2013. "Assessment of a Farmer Base Network in Promoting an Integrated Farming System at the Mekong Delta in Vietnam," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 10(2), pages 39-58, December.
    2. Sriroop Chaudhuri & Mimi Roy & Louis M. McDonald & Yves Emendack, 2021. "Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2973-3008, March.
    3. Vo, Ha Van & Dang, Nhan Kieu & Le, Thach Ngoc & Tran, Be Thanh, 2013. "Assessment of a Farmer Base Network in Promoting an Integrated Farming System at the Mekong Delta in Vietnam," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Christopher Ugochukwu Nwafor & Abiodun A. Ogundeji & Carlu van der Westhuizen, 2020. "Adoption of ICT-Based Information Sources and Market Participation among Smallholder Livestock Farmers in South Africa," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Razman Pahri Siti-Dina & Ah Choy Er & Wai Yan Cheah, 2023. "Social Issues and Challenges among Oil Palm Smallholder Farmers in Malaysia: Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nesrein M. Hashem & Eman M. Hassanein & Jean-François Hocquette & Antonio Gonzalez-Bulnes & Fayrouz A. Ahmed & Youssef A. Attia & Khalid A. Asiry, 2021. "Agro-Livestock Farming System Sustainability during the COVID-19 Era: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Role of Information and Communication Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Logesh Mohankumar & Muthuprasad Thiyaharajan & Kavi Sidharthan Venkidusamy, 2024. "Understanding the communication network of farmers to ensure the sustainable use of pesticides," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 12-23, March.
    3. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Ernest Kwarko Ankrah & Zhao Ding & Yuansheng Jiang, 2023. "Assessing Financial Literacy and Farmland Abandonment Relationship in Ghana," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Simphiwe Innocentia Hlatshwayo & Mjabuliseni Ngidi & Temitope Ojo & Albert Thembinkosi Modi & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi & Rob Slotow, 2021. "A Typology of the Level of Market Participation among Smallholder Farmers in South Africa: Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Jue Wang & Keyi Ju & Xiaozhuo Wei, 2022. "Where Will ‘Water-Energy-Food’ Research Go Next?—Visualisation Review and Prospect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Welcome Ntokozo Sifisosami Zondo & Jorine Tafadzwa Ndoro, 2023. "Attributes of Diffusion of Innovation’s Influence on Smallholder Farmers’ Social Media Adoption in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Haibo Ruan & Jun Chen & Chao Wang & Wendong Xu & Jiayi Tang, 2022. "Social Network, Sense of Responsibility, and Resident Participation in China’s Rural Environmental Governance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Qianhui Ma & Shaofeng Zheng & Peng Deng, 2022. "Impact of Internet Use on Farmers’ Organic Fertilizer Application Behavior under the Climate Change Context: The Role of Social Network," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Rebekah G. K. Hinton & Christopher J. A. Macleod & Mads Troldborg & Gift Wanangwa & Modesta Kanjaye & Emma Mbalame & Prince Mleta & Kettie Harawa & Steve Kumwenda & Robert M. Kalin, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Awareness and Adoption of Borehole-Garden Permaculture in Malawi: Lessons for the Promotion of Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13802-:d:702040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.