IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13075-d688142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Barriers to Agroforestry Adoption by Cocoa Farmers in South-Western Côte d’Ivoire

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Luc Kouassi

    (Laboratoire Science, Société et Environnement (LSSE), UMRI Sciences Agronomiques et Génie Rural, Institut National Polytechnique Félix Houphouët-Boigny (INP-HB), BP 1093, Yamoussoukro 100102, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Allegra Kouassi

    (World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Côte d’Ivoire Country Programme, Cocody Angré 7e Tranche, 08 BP 2823, Abidjan 140101, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Yeboi Bene

    (World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Côte d’Ivoire Country Programme, Cocody Angré 7e Tranche, 08 BP 2823, Abidjan 140101, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Dieudonné Konan

    (International Cocoa Organization, ICCO Building, II Plateaux ENA—Avenue Boga Doudou, 06 BP 1166, Abidjan 140101, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Ebagnerin J. Tondoh

    (World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Côte d’Ivoire Country Programme, Cocody Angré 7e Tranche, 08 BP 2823, Abidjan 140101, Côte d’Ivoire
    UFR des Sciences de la Nature, Université Nangui Abrogoua, 02 BP 801, Abidjan 140101, Côte d’Ivoire)

  • Christophe Kouame

    (World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Côte d’Ivoire Country Programme, Cocody Angré 7e Tranche, 08 BP 2823, Abidjan 140101, Côte d’Ivoire)

Abstract

Agroforestry is part of the package of good agricultural practices (GAPs) referred to as a reference to basic environmental and operational conditions necessary for the safe, healthy, and sustainable production of cocoa. Furthermore, cocoa agroforestry is one of the most effective nature-based solutions to address global change including land degradation, nutrient depletion, climate change, biodiversity loss, food and nutrition insecurity, and rural poverty and current cocoa supply chain issues. This study was carried out in South-Western Côte d’Ivoire through a household survey to assess the willingness of cocoa farmers to adopt cocoa agroforestry, a key step towards achieving sustainability in the cocoa supply chain markedly threatened by all types of biophysical and socio-economic challenges. In total, 910 cocoa households were randomly selected and individually interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Findings revealed that from the overwhelming proportion of farmers practicing full-sun cocoa farming with little or no companion trees associated, 50.2 to 82.1% were willing to plant and to keep fewer than 20 trees per ha in their farms for more than 20 years after planting. The most preferred trees provide a range of ecosystem services, including timber and food production, as well as shade regulation. More than half of the interviewed households considered keeping in their trees in their plantations for more than 20 years subject to the existence of a formal contract to protect their rights and tree ownership. This opinion is significantly affected by age, gender, access to seedlings of companion trees and financial resources. A bold step forward towards transitioning to cocoa agroforestry and thereby agroecological intensification lies in (i) solving the issue of land tenure and tree ownership by raising awareness about the new forest code and, particularly, the understanding of cocoa agroforestry, (ii) highlighting the added value of trees in cocoa lands, and (iii) facilitating access to improved cocoa companion tree materials and incentives. Trends emerged from this six-year-old study about potential obstacles likely to impede the adoption of agroforestry by cocoa farmers meet the conclusions of several studies recently rolled out in the same region for a sustainable cocoa sector, thereby confirming that not only the relevance of this work but also its contribution to paving the way for the promotion of agroecological transition in cocoa farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Luc Kouassi & Allegra Kouassi & Yeboi Bene & Dieudonné Konan & Ebagnerin J. Tondoh & Christophe Kouame, 2021. "Exploring Barriers to Agroforestry Adoption by Cocoa Farmers in South-Western Côte d’Ivoire," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13075-:d:688142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W. J. Blaser & J. Oppong & S. P. Hart & J. Landolt & E. Yeboah & J. Six, 2018. "Climate-smart sustainable agriculture in low-to-intermediate shade agroforests," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 234-239, May.
    2. Owusu, Victor & Frimpong, Frederick Kwabena, 2014. "Impact of cocoa agroforests on yield and household income: Evidence from Ghana," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 170787, Agricultural Economics Society.
    3. Symphorien Ongolo & Sylvestre Kouamé Kouassi & Sadia Chérif & Lukas Giessen, 2018. "The Tragedy of Forestland Sustainability in Postcolonial Africa: Land Development, Cocoa, and Politics in Côte d’Ivoire," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kouassi Jean-Luc & Wandan Narcisse & Mbow Cheikh, 2022. "Observed climate trends, perceived impacts and community adaptation practices in Côte d’Ivoire," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 43-58, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdulai, Issaka & Hoffmann, Munir P. & Jassogne, Laurence & Asare, Richard & Graefe, Sophie & Tao, Hsiao-Hang & Muilerman, Sander & Vaast, Philippe & Van Asten, Piet & Läderach, Peter & Rötter, Reimun, 2020. "Variations in yield gaps of smallholder cocoa systems and the main determining factors along a climate gradient in Ghana," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Alice Fitch & Rebecca L. Rowe & Niall P. McNamara & Cahyo Prayogo & Rizky Maulana Ishaq & Rizki Dwi Prasetyo & Zak Mitchell & Simon Oakley & Laurence Jones, 2022. "The Coffee Compromise: Is Agricultural Expansion into Tree Plantations a Sustainable Option?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Asante, Paulina A. & Rozendaal, Danaё M.A. & Rahn, Eric & Zuidema, Pieter A. & Quaye, Amos K. & Asare, Richard & Läderach, Peter & Anten, Niels P.R., 2021. "Unravelling drivers of high variability of on-farm cocoa yields across environmental gradients in Ghana," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    4. Miftha Beshir & Menfese Tadesse & Fantaw Yimer & Nicolas Brüggemann, 2022. "Factors Affecting Adoption and Intensity of Use of Tef- Acacia decurrens -Charcoal Production Agroforestry System in Northwestern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Lara Domínguez & Colin Luoma, 2020. "Decolonising Conservation Policy: How Colonial Land and Conservation Ideologies Persist and Perpetuate Indigenous Injustices at the Expense of the Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Hernandez-Aguilera, J. Nicolas & Conrad, Jon M. & Gómez, Miguel I. & Rodewald, Amanda D., 2019. "The Economics and Ecology of Shade-grown Coffee: A Model to Incentivize Shade and Bird Conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 110-121.
    7. Iddrisu, Mubarak & Aidoo, Robert & Abawiera Wongnaa, Camillus, 2020. "Participation in UTZ-RA voluntary cocoa certification scheme and its impact on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Ghana," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    8. Eberhard, Erich K. & Hicks, Jessica & Simon, Adam C. & Arbic, Brian K., 2022. "Livelihood considerations in land-use decision-making: Cocoa and mining in Ghana," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    9. Bi Goli Jean Jacques Iritié & Fabrice Soukou Djaléga, 2016. "Diversification of income sources for cocoa farm households: a case study of the Central West of Côte d'Ivoire," African Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 230-265.
    10. Miller, Daniel C. & Cheek, Jennifer Zavaleta & Mansourian, Stephanie & Wildburger, Christoph, 2022. "Forests, trees and the eradication of poverty," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Luzian Messmer & Braida Thom & Pius Kruetli & Evans Dawoe & Kebebew Assefa & Johan Six & Jonas Joerin, 2021. "Beyond feasibility—the role of motivation to implement measures to enhance resilience," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1-24, June.
    12. Elijah K. Ng'eno, 2016. "Impact of Milk Marketing Channel Choice Decision on Income, Employment and Breeding Technologies among Dairy Farmer Households in Kericho County, Kenya," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 3(2), pages 145-155.
    13. Thomas Cherico Wanger & Francis Dennig & Manuel Toledo-Hern'andez & Teja Tscharntke & Eric F. Lambin, 2021. "Cocoa pollination, biodiversity-friendly production, and the global market," Papers 2112.02877, arXiv.org.
    14. Tennhardt, Lina & Lazzarini, Gianna & Weisshaidinger, Rainer & Schader, Christian, 2022. "Do environmentally-friendly cocoa farms yield social and economic co-benefits?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Priscilla Wainaina & Peter A. Minang & Lalisa Duguma & Kennedy Muthee, 2021. "A Review of the Trade-Offs across Different Cocoa Production Systems in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13075-:d:688142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.