IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12517-d677823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proactive Personality and Creative Performance: Mediating Roles of Creative Self-Efficacy and Moderated Mediation Role of Psychological Safety

Author

Listed:
  • Suk Bong Choi

    (College of Global Business, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Korea)

  • S.M. Ebrahim Ullah

    (HR Team, ACI Godrej Agrovet Pvt. Ltd., Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh)

  • Seung-Wan Kang

    (College of Business, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea)

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that employees’ proactive personality can enhance their creative performance. However, studies that address the underlying mechanism of the effect of proactive personality on creative performance have been scarce. Additionally, contextual factors that could serve as useful conditions have received insufficient academic attention. Therefore, the present study proposed that creative self-efficacy serves as a mediator and psychological safety serves as a moderator in the positive relationship between employees’ proactive personality and their creative performance. The results of a large-scale survey revealed that a proactive personality was positively associated with creative performance. Furthermore, we found that the positive relationship between a proactive personality and creative performance was positively mediated by creative self-efficacy and further strengthened by psychological safety. Additionally, we found that psychological safety influenced the mediating role of creative self-efficacy in the link between employees’ proactive personality and creative performance. We have discussed theoretical and practical implications with future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Suk Bong Choi & S.M. Ebrahim Ullah & Seung-Wan Kang, 2021. "Proactive Personality and Creative Performance: Mediating Roles of Creative Self-Efficacy and Moderated Mediation Role of Psychological Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12517-:d:677823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Hoon-Seok & Thompson, Leigh, 2005. "Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 121-132, November.
    2. Francesco Castagna & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Emilio Esposito & Eugenio Oropallo & Renato Passaro, 2020. "Customer Knowledge Management in SMEs Facing Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiu Jin & Chenglin Qing & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Ethical Leadership and Innovative Behavior: Mediating Role of Voice Behavior and Moderated Mediation Role of Psychological Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Aleksandra M. Rogowska & Rafał Tataruch & Konrad Niedźwiecki & Bożena Wojciechowska-Maszkowska, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Relationship between Approach Motivational System and Sports Success among Elite Speed Skating Athletes and Physical Education Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pino G. Audia & Jack A. Goncalo, 2007. "Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Dario Blanco-Fernandez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Interactions between the individual and the group level in organizations: The case of learning and autonomous group adaptation," Papers 2203.09162, arXiv.org.
    3. H. Colleen Stuart, 2017. "Structural Disruption, Relational Experimentation, and Performance in Professional Hockey Teams: A Network Perspective on Member Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 283-300, April.
    4. Anita Williams Woolley, 2009. "Means vs. Ends: Implications of Process and Outcome Focus for Team Adaptation and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 500-515, June.
    5. Jeanne Wilson & C. Brad Crisp & Mark Mortensen, 2013. "Extending Construal-Level Theory to Distributed Groups: Understanding the Effects of Virtuality," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 629-644, April.
    6. Frédéric C. Godart & Andrew V. Shipilov & Kim Claes, 2014. "Making the Most of the Revolving Door: The Impact of Outward Personnel Mobility Networks on Organizational Creativity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 377-400, April.
    7. Zeynep Akşin & Sarang Deo & Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas, 2021. "Learning from Many: Partner Exposure and Team Familiarity in Fluid Teams," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 854-874, February.
    8. Melanie Mesloh, 2021. "Digitale Integration — Chancen für kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen in Deutschland [Digital Integration — Opportunities for German SMEs]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(6), pages 461-465, June.
    9. Goncalo, Jack A. & Duguid, Michelle M., 2008. "Hidden consequences of the group-serving bias: Causal attributions and the quality of group decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 219-233, November.
    10. Bruce A. Reinig & Robert O. Briggs, 2013. "Putting Quality First in Ideation Research," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 943-973, September.
    11. João M. Lopes & José Oliveira, 2022. "The New Times of Social Media Marketing in the B2B Framework," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Roman M. Sheremeta & Matthew W. McCarter, 2013. "You Can’t Put Old Wine in New Bottles: The Effect of Newcomers on Coordination in Groups," Working Papers 13-02, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    13. Grund, Christian & Harbring, Christine & Thommes, Kirsten, 2018. "Group (Re-) formation in public good games: The tale of the bad apple?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 306-319.
    14. JoAnne Yong–Kwan Lim & Lowell W. Busenitz & Laku Chidambaram, 2013. "New Venture Teams and the Quality of Business Opportunities Identified: Faultlines between Subgroups of Founders and Investors," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(1), pages 47-67, January.
    15. Argote, Linda & Fahrenkopf, Erin, 2016. "Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 146-159.
    16. Tsung-Yin Ou & Guan-Yu Lin & Chin-Ying Liu & Wen-Lung Tsai, 2021. "Constructing a Sustainable and Dynamic Promotion Model for Fresh Foods Based on a Digital Transformation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Mirjam Braßler & Martin Schultze, 2021. "Students’ Innovation in Education for Sustainable Development—A Longitudinal Study on Interdisciplinary vs. Monodisciplinary Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Khanna, Rajat, 2021. "Aftermath of a tragedy: A star's death and coauthors’ subsequent productivity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    19. Christina Guenther & Simon Oertel & Peter Walgenbach, 2016. "It's all about Timing: Age–Dependent Consequences of Founder Exits and New Member Additions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(4), pages 843-865, July.
    20. Dar'io Blanco-Fern'andez & Stephan Leitner & Alexandra Rausch, 2022. "Dynamic groups in complex task environments: To change or not to change a winning team?," Papers 2203.09157, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12517-:d:677823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.