IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i1p425-d474995.html

The Wetland Contract as a Tool for Successful Wetland Governance: A Case Study of Ljubljansko Barje Nature Park, Slovenia

Author

Listed:
  • Katarina Polajnar Horvat

    (Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Ales Smrekar

    (Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Our research focuses on implementing multilevel governance of wetlands to achieve an effective participatory process and its overall positive effects on wetland ecosystems and their protection as well as on local sustainable development. The aim of the research is to develop a methodology for establishing the Wetland Contract, a voluntary agreement to foster sustainable management and development of wetlands, to ensure greater coordination and consensus building between various stakeholders involved in management and to limit conflicts between preservation issues and economic activities in wetlands. The Wetland Contract and the integration process for establishing it in Ljubljansko barje Nature Park proved itself able to overcome conflicts between institutional and legal jurisdiction and is showing itself to be a dynamic path capable of activating a desirable relationship between various interests and supporting new forms of multi-sectoral stakeholder participation in wetland management. It has also contributed to a dialogue and shared responsibility among stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarina Polajnar Horvat & Ales Smrekar, 2021. "The Wetland Contract as a Tool for Successful Wetland Governance: A Case Study of Ljubljansko Barje Nature Park, Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:425-:d:474995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/425/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/425/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsveta Petrova, 2011. "Citizen Participation in Local Governance in Eastern Europe: Rediscovering a Strength of Civil Society in the Post-Socialist World?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(5), pages 757-787.
    2. Han Woo Park, 2014. "Transition from the Triple Helix to N-Tuple Helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(1), pages 203-207, April.
    3. Speer, Johanna, 2012. "Participatory Governance Reform: A Good Strategy for Increasing Government Responsiveness and Improving Public Services?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(12), pages 2379-2398.
    4. Maguire, Bernadine & Potts, Jonathan & Fletcher, Stephen, 2012. "The role of stakeholders in the marine planning process--Stakeholder analysis within the Solent, United Kingdom," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 246-257, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandra Ricart & Antonio M. Rico-Amorós, 2022. "Can agriculture and conservation be compatible in a coastal wetland? Balancing stakeholders’ narratives and interactions in the management of El Hondo Natural Park, Spain," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 589-604, June.
    2. Katarina Polajnar Horvat & Primož Gašperič & Kim Leban & Jure Tičar & Aleš Smrekar, 2022. "Participatory Approach to Wetland Governance: The Case of The Memorandum of Understanding of the Sečovlje Salina Nature Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lily - Trinh Hoang Hong Hue, 2019. "Gender Differences of Citizen Participation in Local Government: The Case of Vietnam," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 225-238, December.
    2. Freddie Sayi Siangulube & Mirjam A. F. Ros-Tonen & James Reed & Eric Rega Christophe Bayala & Terry Sunderland, 2023. "Spatial Tools for Inclusive Landscape Governance: Negotiating Land Use, Land-Cover Change, and Future Landscape Scenarios in Two Multistakeholder Platforms in Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    4. King, Elisabeth & Samii, Cyrus, 2014. "Fast-Track Institution Building in Conflict-Affected Countries? Insights from Recent Field Experiments," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 740-754.
    5. Francesco Campanella & Maria Rosaria Della Peruta & Stefano Bresciani & Luca Dezi, 2017. "Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 267-284, April.
    6. de Renzio, Paolo & Wehner, Joachim, 2017. "The impacts of fiscal openness," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 82521, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Zafeirios Thomakis & Irene Daskalopoulou, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Views and Rural Entrepreneurial Potential: Evidence from Greece," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1611-1634, June.
    8. Howe, E. Lance & Murphy, James J. & Gerkey, Drew & Stoddard, Olga B. & West, Colin Thor, 2023. "Sharing, social norms, and social distance: Experimental evidence from Russia and Western Alaska," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 345-358.
    9. Valbona Gjini & Lucian Koprencka, 2018. "Relationship Between Economic Factors and Non-Performing Loans- the Case of Albania," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, ejes_v4_i.
    10. Jungwon Yoon & Joshua SungWoo Yang & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Quintuple helix structure of Sino-Korean research collaboration in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 61-81, October.
    11. Rodwell, Lynda D. & Lowther, Jason & Hunter, Charlotte & Mangi, Stephen C., 2014. "Fisheries co-management in a new era of marine policy in the UK: A preliminary assessment of stakeholder perceptions," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 279-286.
    12. Harry Blair, 2018. "Citizen Participation and Political Accountability for Public Service Delivery in India," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 13(1), pages 54-81, April.
    13. Yusheng Chen & Zhaofa Sun & Yanmei Wang & Ye Ma & Weili Yang, 2024. "Seeds of Cross-Sector Collaboration: A Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game Theoretical Framework Illustrated by the Breeding of Salt-Tolerant Rice," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Richard Arhinful & Hayford Asare Obeng & Leviticus Mensah & Ebenezer Asante-Darko, 2025. "The mediating role of racial discrimination in the relationship between authentic leadership and job commitment in Ghanaian Public Organizations," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Hernández, Alison & Ruano, Ana Lorena & Hurtig, Anna-Karin & Goicolea, Isabel & San Sebastián, Miguel & Flores, Walter, 2019. "Pathways to accountability in rural Guatemala: A qualitative comparative analysis of citizen-led initiatives for the right to health of indigenous populations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 392-401.
    16. Yu Peng Zhu & Han Woo Park, 2025. "Publication, Collaboration, Citation Performance, and Triple Helix Innovation Gene of Artificial Intelligence Research in the Communication Field: Comparing Asia to the Rest of the World," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 10308-10328, June.
    17. Sofia Gomes & João M. Lopes & Luís Ferreira & José Oliveira, 2023. "Science and Technology Parks: Opening the Pandora’s Box of Regional Development," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(3), pages 2787-2810, September.
    18. Ghulam Abbas & Ida Md Yasin & Sazali Abdul Wahab & Ahmad Qammar, 2025. "Innovative Safety Moderation Among Workplace Environment, Workplace Health, and Employee Sustainable Performance: A Holistic Approach for SMEs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3108-3139, March.
    19. Raum, Susanne, 2018. "A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PA), pages 170-184.
    20. Amit Anand Tiwari & Samrat Gupta & Efpraxia D. Zamani & Neeraj Mittal & Renu Agarwal, 2024. "An Overarching Conceptual Framework for ICT-enabled Responsive Governance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1161-1182, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:425-:d:474995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.