IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10724-d644229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilization of Low-Rank Coals for Producing Syngas to Meet the Future Energy Needs: Technical and Economic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Usama Ahmed

    (Chemical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Interdisciplinary Research Center for Hydrogen and Energy Storage, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhammad Arsalan Hussain

    (Institute of Energy & Environmental Engineering, New Campus, University of the Punjab, Lahore 53700, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Bilal

    (Institute of Energy & Environmental Engineering, New Campus, University of the Punjab, Lahore 53700, Pakistan)

  • Hassan Zeb

    (Institute of Energy & Environmental Engineering, New Campus, University of the Punjab, Lahore 53700, Pakistan)

  • Umer Zahid

    (Chemical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Interdisciplinary Research Center for Membranes & Water Security, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sagheer A. Onaizi

    (Chemical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Interdisciplinary Research Center for Hydrogen and Energy Storage, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdul Gani Abdul Jameel

    (Chemical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Center for Refining & Advanced Chemicals, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Increased energy demand in recent decades has resulted in both an energy crisis and carbon emissions. As a result, the development of cleaner fuels has been under the research spotlight. Low-rank coals are geographically dispersed, abundant, and cheap but are not utilized in conventional processes. Syngas can be produced from coal-using gasification which can be used in various chemical engineering applications. In this study, the process model for syngas production from low-rank coal is developed and the effects of various process parameters on syngas composition are evaluated, followed by a technical and economic evaluation. The syngas production rate for the low-rank coal has been evaluated as 25.5 kg/s, and the contribution to H 2 and CO production is estimated as 1.59 kg/s and 23.93 kg/s, respectively. The overall syngas production and energy consumed in the process was evaluated as 27.68 kg/GJ, and the CO 2 specific emissions were calculated as 0.20 (mol basis) for each unit of syngas production. The results revealed that the syngas production efficiency for low-rank coals can be as high as 50.86%. Furthermore, the economic analysis revealed that the investment and minimum selling prices per tonne of syngas production are EUR 163.92 and EUR 180.31, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Usama Ahmed & Muhammad Arsalan Hussain & Muhammad Bilal & Hassan Zeb & Umer Zahid & Sagheer A. Onaizi & Abdul Gani Abdul Jameel, 2021. "Utilization of Low-Rank Coals for Producing Syngas to Meet the Future Energy Needs: Technical and Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10724-:d:644229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mansouri Majoumerd, Mohammad & Raas, Han & De, Sudipta & Assadi, Mohsen, 2014. "Estimation of performance variation of future generation IGCC with coal quality and gasification process – Simulation results of EU H2-IGCC project," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 452-462.
    2. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Rehfeldt, M. & Worrell, E. & Eichhammer, W. & Fleiter, T., 2020. "A review of the emission reduction potential of fuel switch towards biomass and electricity in European basic materials industry until 2030," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Amorino, Carlo, 2013. "Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-169.
    5. Yi, Qun & Feng, Jie & Wu, Yanli & Li, Wenying, 2014. "3E (energy, environmental, and economy) evaluation and assessment to an innovative dual-gas polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 285-294.
    6. Mats Larsson, 2009. "Global Energy Transformation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-24409-2.
    7. Lee, Jong Jun & Kim, Young Sik & Cha, Kyu Sang & Kim, Tong Seop & Sohn, Jeong L. & Joo, Yong Jin, 2009. "Influence of system integration options on the performance of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1788-1796, September.
    8. Chen, Jianjun & Yang, Siyu & Qian, Yu, 2019. "A novel path for carbon-rich resource utilization with lower emission and higher efficiency: An integrated process of coal gasification and coking to methanol production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 304-318.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    2. Xu, Qilong & Wang, Shuai & Luo, Kun & Mu, Yanfei & Pan, Lu & Fan, Jianren, 2023. "Process modelling and optimization of a 250 MW IGCC system: ASU optimization and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Yin, Junjie & Liu, Ming & Zhao, Yongliang & Wang, Chaoyang & Yan, Junjie, 2021. "Dynamic performance and control strategy modification for coal-fired power unit under coal quality variation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Zhang, Chao & Shen, Yuanhui & Zhang, Donghui & Tang, Zhongli & Li, Wenbin, 2022. "Vacuum pressure swing adsorption for producing fuel cell grade hydrogen from IGCC," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    6. Barelli, L. & Ottaviano, A., 2014. "Solid oxide fuel cell technology coupled with methane dry reforming: A viable option for high efficiency plant with reduced CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 118-129.
    7. Shin, Sunkyu & Lee, Jeong-Keun & Lee, In-Beum, 2020. "Development and techno-economic study of methanol production from coke-oven gas blended with Linz Donawitz gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Zhihua Zhang, 2015. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Storage Facilities Coupled to Coal-Fired Power Plants," Energy & Environment, , vol. 26(6-7), pages 1069-1080, November.
    10. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Quang-Loc Nguyen & Ruining Jin & Minh-Hieu Thi Nguyen & Thi-Phuong Nguyen & Viet-Phuong La & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2023. "Increasing Supply for Woody-Biomass-Based Energy through Wasted Resources: Insights from US Private Landowners," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Luo, Yimo & Chen, Yi & Yang, Hongxing & Wang, Yuanhao, 2017. "Study on an internally-cooled liquid desiccant dehumidifier with CFD model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 399-409.
    12. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.
    13. Siddig S. Khalafalla & Umer Zahid & Abdul Gani Abdul Jameel & Usama Ahmed & Feraih S. Alenazey & Chul-Jin Lee, 2020. "Conceptual Design Development of Coal-to-Methanol Process with Carbon Capture and Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Hoffmann, Bettina Susanne & Szklo, Alexandre, 2011. "Integrated gasification combined cycle and carbon capture: A risky option to mitigate CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3917-3929.
    15. Hou, Rui & Zhang, Nachuan & Yang, Chengsheng & Zhao, Jing & Li, Peng & Sun, Bo, 2023. "A novel structure of natural gas, electricity, and methanol production using a combined reforming cycle: Integration of biogas upgrading, liquefied natural gas re-gasification, power plant, and methan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    16. Moon, Dong-Kyu & Lee, Dong-Geun & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2016. "H2 pressure swing adsorption for high pressure syngas from an integrated gasification combined cycle with a carbon capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 760-774.
    17. Yi, Qun & Gong, Min-Hui & Huang, Yi & Feng, Jie & Hao, Yan-Hong & Zhang, Ji-Long & Li, Wen-Ying, 2016. "Process development of coke oven gas to methanol integrated with CO2 recycle for satisfactory techno-economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 618-628.
    18. Kamila Słupińska & Marek Wieruszewski & Piotr Szczypa & Anna Kożuch & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Public Perception of the Use of Woody Biomass for Energy Purposes in the Evaluation of Content and Information Management on the Internet," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-11, September.
    19. Qingyou Yan & Xu Wang & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2018. "Energy–economy–environmental (3E) performance of Chinese regions based on the data envelopment analysis model with mixed assumptions on disposability," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(5), pages 664-684, August.
    20. Holz, Franziska & Scherwath, Tim & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Skar, Christian & Olmos, Luis & Ploussard, Quentin & Ramos, Andrés & Herbst, Andrea, 2021. "A 2050 perspective on the role for carbon capture and storage in the European power system and industry sector," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 104, pages 1-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10724-:d:644229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.