IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9644-d623260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

UGC Sharing Motives and Their Effects on UGC Sharing Intention from Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives: Focusing on Content Creators in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Do-Hyung Park

    (School of Management Information Systems, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea
    Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea)

  • Sungwook Lee

    (LG CNS Co., Ltd., Seoul 07795, Korea)

Abstract

Recently, user-generated content (UGC) has been in the limelight. This study investigates why Internet users share their own UGC and reveals how the motives behind UGC sharing affect UGC sharing intentions both quantitatively and qualitatively. Based on motivations established in existing online communication literature, theoretical UGC motives are identified. Using online surveys administered to 300 users in South Korea, factor analysis is performed to identify empirical UGC sharing motives, and regression analyses shows how UGC sharing motives affect UGC sharing intention in terms of quality and quantity. A total of 10 theoretical UGC motives are consequently factorized into five motives. It is revealed that three motives—self-creation, self-expression, and reward—are related to individual purposes. Users get enjoyment from creating content, they want to be recognized by others, and further expect to be rewarded socially and economically. The other two motives, community commitment and social relationships, are related to social purposes. Users share UGC as a means of communication, desire feedback from others, and want to feel a sense of belonging within certain communities. All of these motives positively affect UGC sharing intention. This is the first study to empirically clarify UGC sharing motives. In addition, this study reveals UGC-centric self-creation and self-expression motives, which have not been the focus of previous online communication studies. Finally, the research results suggest how UGC site managers can adopt practical strategies related to UGC management.

Suggested Citation

  • Do-Hyung Park & Sungwook Lee, 2021. "UGC Sharing Motives and Their Effects on UGC Sharing Intention from Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives: Focusing on Content Creators in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9644-:d:623260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Zhao & Jianfei Wang & Suping Fang & Peiquan Jin, 2018. "Towards Sustainable Development of Online Communities in the Big Data Era: A Study of the Causes and Possible Consequence of Voting on User Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Estela Marine-Roig, 2017. "Measuring Destination Image through Travel Reviews in Search Engines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Kevin Crowston & Isabelle Fagnot, 2018. "Stages of motivation for contributing user-generated content: A theory and empirical test," Post-Print hal-01649925, HAL.
    4. Do-Hyung Park, 2021. "Consumer Adoption of Consumer-Created vs. Expert-Created Information: Moderating Role of Prior Product Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    5. Estela Marine-Roig, 2019. "Destination Image Analytics Through Traveller-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Anjana Susarla & Jeong-Ha Oh & Yong Tan, 2012. "Social Networks and the Diffusion of User-Generated Content: Evidence from YouTube," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 23-41, March.
    7. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "Did You Invest Less Than Me? The Effect of Other’s Share of Investment on Psychological Ownership of Crowdfunding Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Ives Chacourre Wangninanon Gogan & Ziqiong Zhang & Elizabeth Damian Matemba, 2018. "Impacts of Gratifications on Consumers’ Emotions and Continuance Use Intention: An Empirical Study of Weibo in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "The Effective Type of Information Categorization in Online Curation Service Depending on Psychological Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Do-Hyung Park, 2019. "Virtuality Changes Consumer Preference: The Effect of Transaction Virtuality as Psychological Distance on Consumer Purchase Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei Li & Xue Song & Shujun Liu & Kun Huang, 2021. "Defining High-Quality Answers on a Chinese Tourism Q&A Platform in Terms of Information Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Min-Pei Lin & Estela Marine-Roig & Nayra Llonch-Molina, 2021. "Gastronomy as a Sign of the Identity and Cultural Heritage of Tourist Destinations: A Bibliometric Analysis 2001–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Do-Hyung Park, 2021. "Consumer Adoption of Consumer-Created vs. Expert-Created Information: Moderating Role of Prior Product Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Min-Pei Lin & Estela Marine-Roig & Nayra Llonch-Molina, 2022. "Gastronomy Tourism and Well-Being: Evidence from Taiwan and Catalonia Michelin-Starred Restaurants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Estela Marine-Roig & Berta Ferrer-Rosell & Natalia Daries & Eduard Cristobal-Fransi, 2019. "Measuring Gastronomic Image Online," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Estela Marine-Roig, 2021. "Measuring Online Destination Image, Satisfaction, and Loyalty: Evidence from Barcelona Districts," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Marc Vallverdu-Gordi & Estela Marine-Roig, 2023. "The Role of Graphic Design Semiotics in Environmental Awareness Campaigns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Irina Heimbach & Oliver Hinz, 2018. "The Impact of Sharing Mechanism Design on Content Sharing in Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 592-611, September.
    7. Kim, Jeeyeon & Kim, Mingyung & Choi, Jeonghye & Trivedi, Minakshi, 2019. "Offline social interactions and online shopping demand: Does the degree of social interactions matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 373-381.
    8. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "The Effective Type of Information Categorization in Online Curation Service Depending on Psychological Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Nadir Al Naqbi & Naill Al Momani & Amanda Davies, 2022. "The Influence of Social Media on Perceived Levels of National Security and Crisis: A Case Study of Youth in the United Arab Emirates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Andrea Katona & Zoltán Birkner & Erzsébet Péter, 2023. "Examining Digital Transformation Trends in Austrian and Hungarian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Tolga Akcura & Kemal Altinkemer & Hailiang Chen, 0. "Noninfluentials and information dissemination in the microblogging community," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    12. Mingfeng Lin & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Siva Viswanathan, 2013. "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-35, August.
    13. Estela Marine-Roig & Eva Martin-Fuentes & Natalia Daries-Ramon, 2017. "User-Generated Social Media Events in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Liangfei Qiu & Arunima Chhikara & Asoo Vakharia, 2021. "Multidimensional Observational Learning in Social Networks: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 876-894, September.
    15. Shaheer, Noman & Kim, Kijong & Li, Sali, 2022. "Internationalization of Digital Innovations: A Rapidly Evolving Research Stream," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4).
    16. Dutta, Amitava & Puvvala, Abhinay & Roy, Rahul & Seetharaman, Priya, 2017. "Technology diffusion: Shift happens — The case of iOS and Android handsets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 28-43.
    17. Tolga Akcura & Kemal Altinkemer & Hailiang Chen, 2018. "Noninfluentials and information dissemination in the microblogging community," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 89-106, June.
    18. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 0. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    19. Qingliang Wang & Fred Miao & Giri Kumar Tayi & En Xie, 2019. "What makes online content viral? The contingent effects of hub users versus non–hub users on social media platforms," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1005-1026, November.
    20. Catarina Sismeiro & Ammara Mahmood, 2018. "Competitive vs. Complementary Effects in Online Social Networks and News Consumption: A Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5014-5037, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9644-:d:623260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.