IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8795-d609571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bibliometric Narrative Review on Modern Navigation Aids for People with Visual Impairment

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaochen Zhang

    (Department of Industrial Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Xiaoyu Yao

    (Department of Industrial Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Department of Industrial Design, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Lanxin Hui

    (Department of Industrial Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Fuchuan Song

    (F11X Silicon Photonics Process Development, Intel Corporation, Albuquerque, NM 87124, USA)

  • Fei Hu

    (Department of Industrial Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

The innovations in the field of specialized navigation systems have become prominent research topics. As an applied science for people with special needs, navigation aids for the visually impaired are a key sociotechnique that helps users to independently navigate and access needed resources indoors and outdoors. This paper adopts the informetric analysis method to assess the current research and explore trends in navigation systems for the visually impaired based on bibliographic records retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). A total of 528 relevant publications from 2010 to 2020 were analyzed. This work answers the following questions: What are the publication characteristics and most influential publication sources? Who are the most active and influential authors? What are their research interests and primary contributions to society? What are the featured key studies in the field? What are the most popular topics and research trends, described by keywords? Additionally, we closely investigate renowned works that use different multisensor fusion methods, which are believed to be the bases of upcoming research. The key findings of this work aim to help upcoming researchers quickly move into the field, as they can easily grasp the frontiers and the trend of R&D in the research area. Moreover, we suggest the researchers embrace smartphone-based agile development, as well as pay more attention to phone-based prominent frameworks such as ARCore or ARKit, to achieve a fast prototyping for their proposed systems. This study also provides references for the associated fellows by highlighting the critical junctures of the modern assistive travel aids for people with visual impairments.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaochen Zhang & Xiaoyu Yao & Lanxin Hui & Fuchuan Song & Fei Hu, 2021. "A Bibliometric Narrative Review on Modern Navigation Aids for People with Visual Impairment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8795-:d:609571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    2. Qing Ping & Jiangen He & Chaomei Chen, 2017. "How many ways to use CiteSpace? A study of user interactive events over 14 months," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(5), pages 1234-1256, May.
    3. Zhigao Liu & Yimei Yin & Weidong Liu & Michael Dunford, 2015. "Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 135-158, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuefeng Wang & Shuo Zhang & Yuqin liu, 2022. "ITGInsight–discovering and visualizing research fronts in the scientific literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6509-6531, November.
    2. Shuo Yang & Lanxia Zhang & Lele Wang, 2023. "Key Factors of Sustainable Development of Organization: Bibliometric Analysis of Organizational Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Wenting Yang & Jiantong Zhang & Ruolin Ma, 2020. "The Prediction of Infectious Diseases: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Liyan Huang & Hong Ching Goh & Rosli Said, 2023. "Understanding the social integration process of rural–urban migrants in urban china: a bibliometrics review," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1-34, December.
    5. Li, Daitian & Malerba, Franco, 2024. "Technological change and the evolution of the links across sectoral systems: The case of mobile communications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    6. Baoyi Zhang, 2024. "Research progress and intellectual structure of design for digital equity (DDE): A bibliometric analysis based on citespace," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Dejian Yu, 2015. "A scientometrics review on aggregation operator research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 115-133, October.
    8. Dejian Yu & Libo Sheng & Shunshun Shi, 2023. "A retrospective analysis of Journal of Forecasting: From 1982 to 2019," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 1008-1035, July.
    9. Seyedghorban, Zahra & Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & LaPlaca, Peter, 2016. "Advancing theory and knowledge in the business-to-business branding literature," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2664-2677.
    10. Kefan Xie & Benbu Liang & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Yanlan Mei, 2020. "The Impact of Risk Perception on Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Yaowu Sun & Yi Zhai, 2018. "Mapping the knowledge domain and the theme evolution of appropriability research between 1986 and 2016: a scientometric review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 203-230, July.
    12. Zhenyu Yang & Wenyu Zhang & Zhimin Wang & Xiaoling Huang, 2024. "A deep learning-based method for predicting the emerging degree of research topics using emerging index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(7), pages 4021-4042, July.
    13. Xu, Haiyun & Winnink, Jos & Yue, Zenghui & Zhang, Huiling & Pang, Hongshen, 2021. "Multidimensional Scientometric indicators for the detection of emerging research topics," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Xiaofeng Zhao & Mei Lei & Runyao Gu, 2022. "Knowledge Mapping of the Phytoremediation of Cadmium-Contaminated Soil: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1994 to 2021," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Xingwen Chen & Li Zhu & Chao Liu & Chunhua Chen & Jun Liu & Dongxia Huo, 2023. "Workplace Diversity in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1021-1045, September.
    16. Souzanchi Kashani, Ebrahim & Roshani, Saeed, 2019. "Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 68-80.
    17. Xingming Ma & Lifeng Zhang & Jingqiu Wang & Yanping Luo, 2019. "Knowledge Domain and Emerging Trends on Echinococcosis Research: A Scientometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Chengliang Liu & Qinchang Gui, 2016. "Mapping intellectual structures and dynamics of transport geography research: a scientometric overview from 1982 to 2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(1), pages 159-184, October.
    19. Hongyu Liu & Shukuan Zhao & Ouyang Xin, 2019. "Analysis on the Evolution Path and Hotspot of Knowledge Innovation Study Based on Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.
    20. Bingke Zhu & Hao Fan & Bingbing Xie & Ran Su & Chaofeng Zhou & Jianping He, 2020. "Mapping the Scientific Research on Healthcare Workers’ Occupational Health: A Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8795-:d:609571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.