IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p8024-d596685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Logistics Service Supply Chain Games Considering Risk Preference in Fuzzy Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Shuna Wang

    (Logistics Research Center, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 200135, China
    School of Business, Heze University, Heze 274015, China)

  • Zhi-Hua Hu

    (Logistics Research Center, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 200135, China)

Abstract

The increasing pressures from environmental crises are responsible for the green and sustainable choices made in supply chain management. Green logistics service supply chain ( LSSC ) operations play a significant role in reducing the environmental burden of the supply chain, and the risk preferences of logistics enterprises lead to more uncertainties in the green management of LSSC . Much research has been limited to case studies of green LSSC , and the different combinations of risk preferences among LSSC participants have generally been ignored. This paper investigates the impact of the risk preference on the equilibrium behavior of an LSSC composed of one logistics service integrator ( LSI ) and one logistics service provider ( LSP ) under fuzzy decision environments. Considering the fact that the greening innovation cost and the parameters of the demand function are all characterized as fuzzy variables, the games between the LSI and LSP with different risk preferences were comprehensively proposed under three scenarios. Then, the optimal decisions of the LSP and LSI were drawn, and numerical examples are presented. The results show that an optimistic risk attitude can appropriately improve the greening level, price, and green innovation cost of logistics services, while both risk appetite and risk aversion can lead to an increase in the outsourcing price. Moreover, when the decision maker is risk neutral, the partner’s risk attitude has a significant effect on the value of the decision variables and the cost. Finally, the optimal profits of different risk preference behaviors between the LSI and LSP vary among the game models under fuzzy environments. Subsequently, we obtained three management insights. Total involvement and cooperation among participants were vital factors for an improvement in green management in the LSSC . Additionally, risk preference plays a key role in how LSSC participants make decisions under fuzzy environments. Additionally, a dominant position in the LSSC plays a crucial role in generating profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuna Wang & Zhi-Hua Hu, 2021. "Green Logistics Service Supply Chain Games Considering Risk Preference in Fuzzy Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-32, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8024-:d:596685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8024/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Xiaotong & Zhang, Kai & Chen, Bokui & Zhou, Jun & Miao, Lixin, 2018. "Analysis of logistics service supply chain for the One Belt and One Road initiative of China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 23-39.
    2. Liu, Weihua & Wang, Yijia, 2015. "Quality control game model in logistics service supply chain based on different combinations of risk attitude," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 181-191.
    3. Liu, Weihua & Wang, Qian & Mao, Qiaomei & Wang, Shuqing & Zhu, Donglei, 2015. "A scheduling model of logistics service supply chain based on the mass customization service and uncertainty of FLSP’s operation time," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 189-215.
    4. Shenle Pan & Ray Zhong & Ting Qu, 2019. "Smart product-service systems in interoperable logistics: Design and implementation prospects," Post-Print hal-02316272, HAL.
    5. Huang, Shuai & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Wang, Ningning, 2020. "Green subsidy modes and pricing strategy in a capital-constrained supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    6. Liu, Weihua & Wang, Di & Shen, Xinran & Yan, Xiaoyu & Wei, Wanying, 2018. "The impacts of distributional and peer-induced fairness concerns on the decision-making of order allocation in logistics service supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 102-122.
    7. Lau, Amy Hing Ling & Lau, Hon-Shiang, 2005. "Some two-echelon supply-chain games: Improving from deterministic-symmetric-information to stochastic-asymmetric-information models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 203-223, February.
    8. Dou, Yijie & Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph, 2014. "Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 420-431.
    9. Hu, Xiaojian & Wang, Guanxiong & Li, Xiaozheng & Zhang, Yue & Feng, Shuai & Yang, Aifeng, 2018. "Joint decision model of supplier selection and order allocation for the mass customization of logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-95.
    10. Zhu, Qinghua & Sarkis, Joseph & Lai, Kee-hung, 2008. "Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 261-273, February.
    11. Rebecca S. Widrick & Sarah G. Nurre & Matthew J. Robbins, 2018. "Optimal Policies for the Management of an Electric Vehicle Battery Swap Station," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 59-79, January.
    12. Kostas Bimpikis & Ozan Candogan & Shayan Ehsani, 2019. "Supply Disruptions and Optimal Network Structures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(12), pages 5504-5517, December.
    13. Frank Schneider & Ulrich W. Thonemann & Diego Klabjan, 2018. "Optimization of Battery Charging and Purchasing at Electric Vehicle Battery Swap Stations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1211-1234, October.
    14. Yingjie Ju & Yue Wang & Ye Cheng & Jun Jia, 2019. "Investigating the Impact Factors of the Logistics Service Supply Chain for Sustainable Performance: Focused on Integrators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Süleyman Demirel & Roman Kapuscinski & Man Yu, 2018. "Strategic Behavior of Suppliers in the Face of Production Disruptions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 533-551, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jili Kong & Ziyu Chen & Xiaoping Liu, 2022. "A Review of Logistics Pricing Research Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Hao Liu & Haodong Chen & Hengyi Zhang & Haibin Liu & Xingwang Yu & Shiqing Zhang, 2022. "Contract Design of Logistics Service Supply Chain Based on Smart Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Peng Xing & Xiangru Zhao & Mingxing Wang, 2022. "The Optimal Combination between Recycling Channel and Logistics Service Outsourcing in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Environmental Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Xu Xu & Chan He, 2022. "The Effects of Network Structure Attributes on Growth Performance of Logistics Service Integrators in Logistics Service Supply Chain: Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Liu & Haodong Chen & Hengyi Zhang & Haibin Liu & Xingwang Yu & Shiqing Zhang, 2022. "Contract Design of Logistics Service Supply Chain Based on Smart Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Shen, Bin & Xu, Xiaoyan & Guo, Shu, 2019. "The impacts of logistics services on short life cycle products in a global supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 153-167.
    3. Wang, Kai & Ding, Peiqi & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2021. "Strategic credit sales to express retail under asymmetric default risk and stochastic market demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Asadi, Amin & Nurre Pinkley, Sarah, 2021. "A stochastic scheduling, allocation, and inventory replenishment problem for battery swap stations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Guangmei Cao & Yuesen Wang & Honghu Gao & Hao Liu & Haibin Liu & Zhigang Song & Yuqing Fan, 2023. "Coordination Decision-Making for Intelligent Transformation of Logistics Services under Capital Constraint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Liu, Zhongyi & Li, Mengyu & Zhai, Xin, 2022. "Managing supply chain disruption threat via a strategy combining pricing and self-protection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Wenwen Zhu & Zhiqiang Wang, 2018. "The Collaborative Networks and Thematic Trends of Research on Purchasing and Supply Management for Environmental Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Huang, Shuai & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Wang, Ningning, 2020. "Green subsidy modes and pricing strategy in a capital-constrained supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Samad, Sarminah & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Almulihi, Ahmed & Alrizq, Mesfer & Alghamdi, Abdullah & Mohd, Saidatulakmal & Ahmadi, Hossein & Syed Azhar, Sharifah Nurlaili Farhana, 2021. "Green Supply Chain Management practices and impact on firm performance: The moderating effect of collaborative capability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Yu Feng & Xiaochun Lu, 2021. "Construction Planning and Operation of Battery Swapping Stations for Electric Vehicles: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Handson Claudio Dias Pimenta & Peter Ball & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2021. "Supply chain environmental and social sustainability practice diffusion: Bibliometrics, content analysis and conceptual framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1870-1890, November.
    12. Lou, Yaqi & Feng, Lipan & He, Shuguang & He, Zhen & Zhao, Xiukun, 2020. "Logistics service outsourcing choices in a retailer-led supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Lingshu Zhong & Mingyang Pei, 2020. "Optimal Design for a Shared Swap Charging System Considering the Electric Vehicle Battery Charging Rate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Hu, Xiaojian & Wang, Guanxiong & Li, Xiaozheng & Zhang, Yue & Feng, Shuai & Yang, Aifeng, 2018. "Joint decision model of supplier selection and order allocation for the mass customization of logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 76-95.
    15. Fan, Di & Xiao, Chengyong & Zhang, Xiao & Guo, Yujuan, 2021. "Gaining customer satisfaction through sustainable supplier development: The role of firm reputation and marketing communication," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Wang, Kai & Lin, Jun & Liu, Guoquan & Liu, Qi, 2022. "Strategic introduction of logistics retail and finance under competition and channel spillover," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Ren, Shuyun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Lee, Ka-Man & Lin, Lei, 2020. "Intelligent service capacity allocation for cross-border-E-commerce related third-party-forwarding logistics operations: A deep learning approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    18. Guo, Lei & Yin, Haitao & Zhao, Xuan & Zhu, Qinghua, 2022. "Managing your own low-tier suppliers via donation to NGOs: Why do multi-national corporations bother?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    19. Guangsheng Zhang & Xiao Wang & Yu Zhang & Jiayun Kang, 2022. "Research on the Emission Reduction Decision of Cost-Sharing Logistics Service Supply Chain in the O2O Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Huo, Baofeng & Gu, Minhao & Jiang, Bin, 2018. "China-related POM research: Literature review and suggestions for future research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 134-153.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8024-:d:596685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.