IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p8020-d596646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Technology to Ensure Business Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Siderska

    (Faculty of Engineering Management, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45a Street, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

The study provides knowledge on the adoption of the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) technology during the COVID-19 pandemic in 110 Polish service companies. As this research was the first of its kind in Poland, the objectives of the CAWI survey were to identify the technology features of the RPA technology and the related determinants and barriers influencing the adoption of the RPA as well as to determine correlations between them. Moreover, the statistical analyses involved considering whether there were differences in the evaluation of individual RPA technology features, mainly in terms of perceived usefulness, ease of use, security and functionality. The results of the study show that almost 60% of the respondents indicated that robotization tools allowed maintaining continuity of business processes during the pandemic. The highest rated were features related to usefulness of the RPA technology. Furthermore, the analysis pointed to the most frequently indicated barriers to technology implementation that were related to nonoptimized, nonstandardized and non-digitized processes with a large number of exceptions. The study contributes to scientific knowledge and has practical implications for process automation decision-makers concerned with the adoption of the Robotic Process Automation technology. The obtained results can help them to understand the potential drivers of and barriers to the adoption of software robots by enterprises and may be an important determinant for companies’ managers in the field of implementing such solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Siderska, 2021. "The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Technology to Ensure Business Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8020-:d:596646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margherita, Alessandro & Heikkilä, Marikka, 2021. "Business continuity in the COVID-19 emergency: A framework of actions undertaken by world-leading companies," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 683-695.
    2. Peter Hofmann & Caroline Samp & Nils Urbach, 2020. "Robotic process automation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 99-106, March.
    3. Wil M. P. Aalst & Martin Bichler & Armin Heinzl, 2018. "Robotic Process Automation," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(4), pages 269-272, August.
    4. Michał Kucia & Grzegorz Hajduk & Grzegorz Mazurek & Nina Kotula, 2021. "The Implementation of New Technologies in Customer Value Management—A Sustainable Development Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Jan Brocke & Wolfgang Maaß & Peter Buxmann & Alexander Maedche & Jan Marco Leimeister & Günter Pecht, 2018. "Future Work and Enterprise Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(4), pages 357-366, August.
    6. Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker & Jan Brocke, 2012. "Green Business Process Management," Springer Books, in: Jan vom Brocke & Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker (ed.), Green Business Process Management, edition 127, pages 3-13, Springer.
    7. Lacity, Mary & Willcocks, Leslie P. & Craig, Andrew, 2015. "Robotic process automation at Telefónica O2," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64516, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Constantin Houy & Markus Reiter & Peter Fettke & Peter Loos & Konstantin Hoesch-Klohe & Aditya Ghose, 2012. "Advancing Business Process Technology for Humanity: Opportunities and Challenges of Green BPM for Sustainable Business Activities," Springer Books, in: Jan vom Brocke & Stefan Seidel & Jan Recker (ed.), Green Business Process Management, edition 127, pages 75-92, Springer.
    9. Willcocks, Leslie & Lacity, Mary & Craig, Andrew, 2017. "Robotic process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 71146, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Sora Yoon, 2020. "A Study on the Transformation of Accounting Based on New Technologies: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sylvia Jenčová & Petra Vašaničová & Marta Miškufová, 2023. "Multidimensional Evaluation of EU and Slovakia in the Context of Digital Transformation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 65-95.
    2. Costa Diogo António da Silva & Mamede Henrique São & Mira da Silva Miguel, 2022. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Paulina Golinska-Dawson & Karolina Werner-Lewandowska & Karolina Kolinska & Adam Kolinski, 2023. "Impact of Market Drivers on the Digital Maturity of Logistics Processes in a Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Maciej Cieślukowski & Przemysław Garsztka & Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak, 2022. "The Impact of Robotification on the Financial Situation of Microenterprises: Evidence from the Financial Services Sector in Poland," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Daehyoun Choi & Hind R’bigui & Chiwoon Cho, 2021. "Candidate Digital Tasks Selection Methodology for Automation with Robotic Process Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Radosław Drozd & Radosław Wolniak & Jan Piwnik, 2023. "Systemic analysis of a manufacturing process based on a small scale bakery," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1421-1437, April.
    7. Anna Kosieradzka & Justyna Smagowicz & Cezary Szwed, 2022. "Application of Protective Measures against COVID-19 in Polish Production Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plattfaut, Ralf & Koch, Julian, 2021. "Preserving the legacy – Why do professional soccer clubs (not) adopt innovative process technologies? A grounded theory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 237-250.
    2. Peter Hofmann & Caroline Samp & Nils Urbach, 2020. "Robotic process automation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 99-106, March.
    3. Costa Diogo António da Silva & Mamede Henrique São & Mira da Silva Miguel, 2022. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Adoption: A Systematic Literature Review," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, June.
    4. Fatma Lestari & Margaret Cook & Kelly Johnstone & Miranda Surya Wardhany & Robiana Modjo & Baiduri Widanarko & Devie Fitri Octaviani, 2022. "COVID-19 in the Workplace in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Rainer Alt, 2021. "Electronic Markets on robotics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 465-471, September.
    6. Uklańska Anna, 2023. "Robotic Process Automation (RPA) – Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 129-140, January.
    7. Mohamed Saeudy & Ali Meftah Gerged & Khaldoon Albitar, 2022. "Accounting Perspectives on The Business Value of Big Data During and Beyond The COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 174-199, June.
    8. Grzegorz Maciejewski & Mirosława Malinowska & Barbara Kucharska & Michał Kucia & Beata Kolny, 2021. "Sustainable Development as a Factor Differentiating Consumer Behavior: The Case of Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 934-948.
    9. Vyacheslav Makedon & Nataliya Krasnikova & Oleksandr Krupskyi & Yuliia Stasiuk, 2022. "Arrangement of Digital Leadership Strategy by Corporate Structures: A Review," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 8, pages 19-40.
    10. Benedikt Berger & Martin Adam & Alexander Rühr & Alexander Benlian, 2021. "Watch Me Improve—Algorithm Aversion and Demonstrating the Ability to Learn," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(1), pages 55-68, February.
    11. Carla Carvalho & Ana Carlos Almeida, 2022. "The Adequacy of Accounting Education in the Development of Transversal Skills Needed to Meet Market Demands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Brougham, David & Haar, Jarrod, 2020. "Technological disruption and employment: The influence on job insecurity and turnover intentions: A multi-country study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Wafa Alwakid & Sebastian Aparicio & David Urbano, 2021. "The Influence of Green Entrepreneurship on Sustainable Development in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Formal Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Alexandru-Mihai Crijman, 2021. "Good Business Processes Candidates For Automation Future Of Work: Robotic Process Automation," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 63-71, August.
    15. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2022. "An Empirical Framework for Assessing the Balanced Scorecard Impact on Sustainable Development in Healthcare Performance Measurement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Balwant Singh Mehta & Ishwar Awasthi & Nidhi Mehta, 2021. "Women’s Employment and Digital Technology: A Regional Analysis in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 15(3), pages 427-442, December.
    17. Minodora Ursacescu & Dan Popescu & Cristina State & Ion Smeureanu, 2019. "Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.
    18. Federico A. Lievano-Martínez & Javier D. Fernández-Ledesma & Daniel Burgos & John W. Branch-Bedoya & Jovani A. Jimenez-Builes, 2022. "Intelligent Process Automation: An Application in Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Rainer Alt & Jan Marco Leimeister & Thomas Priemuth & Stephan Sachse & Nils Urbach & Nico Wunderlich, 2020. "Software-Defined Business," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 609-621, December.
    20. Ulrich Gnewuch & Stefan Morana & Marc T. P. Adam & Alexander Maedche, 2022. "Opposing Effects of Response Time in Human–Chatbot Interaction," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 773-791, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8020-:d:596646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.