IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p8008-d596357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of Satellite Offices in Response to a Pandemic: Sustainability and Infection Control

Author

Listed:
  • Seungbeom Kim

    (College of Business Administration, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea)

  • Yooneun Lee

    (Department of Engineering Management, Systems, and Technology, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469, USA)

  • Byungchul Choi

    (College of Business, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 02450, Korea)

Abstract

The office environment has changed rapidly due to the recent COVID-19 outbreak. Companies consider various types of remote work environments to contain the spread of the virus. Among them, a satellite office is a type of remote work environment where a number of employees are allocated to their nearest office. The benefits from satellite offices are twofold: The significant reduction of travel distance also reduces the amount of carbon emission and fuel consumption. In addition, dividing employees into smaller groups significantly reduces the potential risks of infection in the office. This paper addresses a satellite office allocation problem that considers social and environmental sustainability and infection control at work. In order to evaluate the effect of different satellite office allocation, quantitative measures are developed for the following three criteria: carbon emission, fuel consumption, and the probability of infection occurrence at work. Simulation experiments are conducted to investigate different scenarios of regional infection rate and modes of transportation. The results show that adopting satellite offices not only reduces carbon emission and fuel consumption, but also mitigates business disruption in the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Seungbeom Kim & Yooneun Lee & Byungchul Choi, 2021. "Adoption of Satellite Offices in Response to a Pandemic: Sustainability and Infection Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8008-:d:596357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina-Mihaela Dima & Claudia-Elena Țuclea & Diana-Maria Vrânceanu & Gabriela Țigu, 2019. "Sustainable Social and Individual Implications of Telework: A New Insight into the Romanian Labor Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Chen, Lujie & Olhager, Jan & Tang, Ou, 2014. "Manufacturing facility location and sustainability: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 154-163.
    3. Gérard P. Cachon, 2014. "Retail Store Density and the Cost of Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 1907-1925, August.
    4. Leon Cooper, 1963. "Location-Allocation Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 331-343, June.
    5. Turken, Nazli & Carrillo, Janice & Verter, Vedat, 2017. "Facility location and capacity acquisition under carbon tax and emissions limits: To centralize or to decentralize?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 126-141.
    6. Chaabane, A. & Ramudhin, A. & Paquet, M., 2012. "Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 37-49.
    7. Erik Brynjolfsson & John J. Horton & Adam Ozimek & Daniel Rock & Garima Sharma & Hong-Yi TuYe, 2020. "COVID-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at US Data," NBER Working Papers 27344, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Waqas Nawaz & Muammer Koç, 2019. "Exploring Organizational Sustainability: Themes, Functional Areas, and Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-36, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matus Barath & Dusana Alshatti Schmidt, 2022. "Offices after the COVID-19 Pandemic and Changes in Perception of Flexible Office Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaigné, C. & Hovelaque, V. & Mechouar, Y., 2020. "Carbon tax and sustainable facility location: The role of production technology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Youcef MECHOUAR & V Hovelaque & C Gaigné, 2021. "Effect of raw material substitution on the facility location decision under a carbon tax policy," Post-Print hal-04155066, HAL.
    3. Turken, Nazli & Carrillo, Janice & Verter, Vedat, 2017. "Facility location and capacity acquisition under carbon tax and emissions limits: To centralize or to decentralize?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 126-141.
    4. Mung Khie Tsen & Manli Gu & Chee Meng Tan & See Kwong Goh, 2023. "Homeworking and Employee Job Stress and Work Engagement: A Multilevel Analysis from 34 European Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 511-538, August.
    5. Liangjie Xia & Tingting Guo & Juanjuan Qin & Xiaohang Yue & Ning Zhu, 2018. "Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 149-175, September.
    6. Li, Dong & Cruz, Jose M., 2022. "Multiperiod supply chain network dynamics under investment in sustainability, externality cost, and consumers’ willingness to pay," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    7. Reddy, K. Nageswara & Kumar, Akhilesh & Choudhary, Alok & Cheng, T. C. Edwin, 2022. "Multi-period green reverse logistics network design: An improved Benders-decomposition-based heuristic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 735-752.
    8. Van Engeland, Jens & Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & De Jaeger, Simon, 2020. "Literature review: Strategic network optimization models in waste reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Yu, Min & Cruz, Jose M. & Li, Dong & Masoumi, Amir H., 2022. "A multiperiod competitive supply chain framework with environmental policies and investments in sustainable operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 112-123.
    10. Turken, Nazli & Carrillo, Janice & Verter, Vedat, 2020. "Strategic supply chain decisions under environmental regulations: When to invest in end-of-pipe and green technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 601-613.
    11. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Shaligram Pokharel & Fatih Mutlu, 2019. "The Design of Green Supply Chains under Carbon Policies: A Literature Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Yu, Min & Cruz, Jose M. & Li, Dong Michelle, 2019. "The sustainable supply chain network competition with environmental tax policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 218-231.
    13. Muren, & Li, Hao & Mukhopadhyay, Samar K. & Wu, Jian-jun & Zhou, Li & Du, Zhiping, 2020. "Balanced maximal covering location problem and its application in bike-sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Longfei He & Daozhi Zhao & Liangjie Xia, 2015. "Game Theoretic Analysis of Carbon Emission Abatement in Fashion Supply Chains Considering Vertical Incentives and Channel Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-30, April.
    15. Jaehyung An & Jinho Lee, 2018. "A Newsvendor Non-Cooperative Game for Efficient Allocation of Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Mustapha Anwar Brahami & Mohammed Dahane & Mehdi Souier & M’hammed Sahnoun, 2022. "Sustainable capacitated facility location/network design problem: a Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm based multiobjective approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 821-852, April.
    17. Jinpyo Lee & Mi Lim Lee & Minjae Park, 2018. "A Newsboy Model with Quick Response under Sustainable Carbon Cap-N-Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Thomas Hacardiaux & Jean-Sébastien Tancrez, 2020. "Assessing the environmental benefits of horizontal cooperation using a location-inventory model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(4), pages 1363-1387, December.
    19. Wang, Mingxi & Hu, Yi & Wang, Shouyang & Dang, Chuangyin, 2023. "The optimal carbon tax mechanism for managing carbon emissions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    20. Qinpeng Wang & Longfei He & Daozhi Zhao & Michele Lundy, 2018. "Diverse Schemes of Cost Pooling for Carbon-Reduction Outsourcing in Low-Carbon Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8008-:d:596357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.